JB/096/200/001

Click Here To Edit

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet Manslaughter, that is killing done in cold anger produces a mischief of the first order, which every man, were there no punishment to check it, might have reason to apprehend much more then now that there is a punishment, from such persons (of horror papicreto term per absents) as falls within his acquaintance. These persons are few in comparison of those to whom a man would stand underposed to suffer the late pain, were there no punishment for Murder I am speaking now of killing done through Avarice.

From the true mischief of cash is as the matter of the sil of persons to that of the other.

It is but too true, that the whole doctrine of concluding manslaughter and murder is a science of the most deplorable confession

Lawyers joy on with their unreal indifference through this confusion, amidst establishments which give an equal shock to the heart and the understanding.

The whole doctrine /notion of concerning killing of the particular cases of high and faulty treason accepted is decided into murder and manslaughter. The punishments that are distributed accordingly to this division. Thus the mischief of the offence does nothing up than levels not with this proportionment of the punishment. There are murders vastly more mischievous than murders: there are manslaughters vastly more mischievous than manslaughters: Murder through avarice is other first by persons specially related : or second, by persons at large. From murder by persons at large there is danger to a greater number. But form murder by specially related there is first greater opportunity: second greater motives. The danger of each one of these that stand exposed. On the other hand there are in this either case greater restrictions than in the other: questionable readingaffectionquestionable readingwhether through blood or through simple intercourse. _______________________________________________ Let the danger from unpunished manslaughter for such, that every man might , for example, have one man who would have the adequate motive and opportunity to questionable readingmy death in this manner at some time within 40 years. For one man that has such adequate motive and opportunity during the same period there would be many men who would have the same were murder to be punished. On this case therefore, the danger from murder is some number of times greater than that from manslaughter. My life could not stand too years against impositions of manslaughter: it could not stand one-fourth of a year against dispositions to murder. _______________________________________________ There were murders that are not mischievous : and kind nor manslaughters more mischievous than those that are; Homicide by duelling is homicide ensuing from attempts done and suffered by consent. Every man may choose whether he will consent: every man therefore may choose whether he will die by duelling. That of which means he may choose whether it shall come to pass or not, he is not afraid of hurdles not approached homicide by duelling , therefore as such carried with it.

Identifier: | JB/096/200/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	096	Main Headings	legislation
Folio number	200	Info in main headings field	murder manslaughter duelling
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	31204
Box Contents