JB/070/227/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/227/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<add>L<del>arceny</del></add> <head>EMBEZZLEMENT.</head><add>LAW &amp; FACT 2</add><p></p> Commonly it might be taken to <gap/>, and if <add>when</add> <unclear>willing</unclear> can appeared, a Jury might <add>right</add> begin<lb/> inferring it: but universally it <hi rend='underline'>cannot</hi>, as we see <add>by </add> in the instances  
<add>L<del>arceny</del></add> <head>EMBEZZLEMENT.</head><add>LAW &amp; FACT 2</add><p></p> Commonly it might be taken to <gap/>, and if <add>when</add> <unclear>willing</unclear> can appeared, a Jury might <add>right</add> begin<lb/> inferring it: but universally it <hi rend='underline'>cannot</hi>, as we see <add>by </add> in the instances <gap/> <gap/> <unclear>&amp;</unclear><lb/> therefore was not fitting to be established by a maxim of law.<p></p><note><head>LARCENY</head><p></p> When I ask for a definition of [the<lb/> <del>word</del>]larceny, I wish to have <unclear>most</unclear> an account of the Acts comprised<lb/> under that <gap/>, whereby I may <gap/><lb/> them from others that resemble<lb/> them yet not so much as [also]<lb/> to be comprised under it-<p></p> An account given in language<lb/> which those who may <add>are apt to</add> be expressed<lb/> to the temptation of committing them<lb/> may understand<p></p> And not [for] an explanation of<lb/> word already too remote from the<lb/> familiarity of discourse, by one still<lb/><unclear> man</unclear><gap/>.</note><p></p> <head>EMBEZZL.<add>T</add> LAW &amp; Fact. [BR][6] 
 
</head>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 17:45, 14 January 2011

Click Here To Edit

Larceny EMBEZZLEMENT.LAW & FACT 2

Commonly it might be taken to , and if when willing can appeared, a Jury might right begin
inferring it: but universally it cannot, as we see by in the instances &
therefore was not fitting to be established by a maxim of law.

LARCENY

When I ask for a definition of [the
word]larceny, I wish to have most an account of the Acts comprised
under that , whereby I may
them from others that resemble
them yet not so much as [also]
to be comprised under it-

An account given in language
which those who may are apt to be expressed
to the temptation of committing them
may understand

And not [for] an explanation of
word already too remote from the
familiarity of discourse, by one still
man.

EMBEZZL.T LAW & Fact. [BR][6]



Identifier: | JB/070/227/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

227

Info in main headings field

law & fact embezzlement

Image

001

Titles

larceny

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23342

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in