JB/070/282/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/282/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


Give a <unclear>sequestration</unclear> of half the profits of a place requiring<lb/> skill, attendance, &amp; <unclear><hi rend='underline'>unstable</hi></unclear>: Not more, least<lb/> he should not find it sufficiently worth his while<lb/> to abstain from incurring a voluntary forfeiture to-<lb/>shake them off. or by undesigning remissness. A forced<lb/> absence from the Scene of duty in such cases his doubtless<lb/> often the affect of serving the Debtor without giving<lb/> satisfaction to the Creditor. In Bankruptcy the<lb/> Assigners might be appointed Receivers and those<lb/> whom it concerned obliged to pay after due notice&#x2014;<lb/>&amp; so <foreign>totus quotius</foreign> upon his taking any other place&#x2014;<lb/>the Debtor-Placeman's name being registered for that<lb/> purpose upon every such first occasion.<p>So in case of an insolvent Debtor not a Trader &amp;<lb/> so not a Bankrupt&#x2014; Any one Creditor might&#x2014;<lb/> sequester upon due notice given for others to come in.<p>An Insolvent Debtor or Bankrupt concealing his<lb/> effects; so also a person who undertakes to exhibit an<lb/> inventory in order to procure a mitigation of a fine<lb/> may be punished as for Theft or Embezzlement, <foreign>ad</foreign><lb/> <foreign>valorem</foreign>: such a retention after the Oath taken being<lb/> a real embezzlement, &amp; performed <hi rend='underline'>without pretense of<lb/> Title</hi></p><pb/> The objection against  
<head>INSOLVENCY [BR]3.</head><p></p>Give a <unclear>sequestration</unclear> of half the profits of a place requiring<lb/> skill, attendance, &amp; <unclear><hi rend='underline'>unstable</hi></unclear>: Not more, least<lb/> he should not find it sufficiently worth his while<lb/> to abstain from incurring a voluntary forfeiture to-<lb/>shake them off. or by undesigning remissness. A forced<lb/> absence from the Scene of duty in such cases his doubtless<lb/> often the affect of serving the Debtor without giving<lb/> satisfaction to the Creditor. In Bankruptcy the<lb/> Assigners might be appointed Receivers and those<lb/> whom it concerned obliged to pay after due notice&#x2014;<lb/>&amp; so <foreign>totus quotius</foreign> upon his taking any other place&#x2014;<lb/>the Debtor-Placeman's name being registered for that<lb/> purpose upon every such first occasion.<p>So in case of an insolvent Debtor not a Trader &amp;<lb/> so not a Bankrupt&#x2014; Any one Creditor might&#x2014;<lb/> sequester upon due notice given for others to come in.<p>An Insolvent Debtor or Bankrupt concealing his<lb/> effects; so also a person who undertakes to exhibit an<lb/> inventory in order to procure a mitigation of a fine<lb/> may be punished as for Theft or Embezzlement, <foreign>ad</foreign><lb/> <foreign>valorem</foreign>: such a retention after the Oath taken being<lb/> a real embezzlement, &amp; performed <hi rend='underline'>without pretense of<lb/> Title</hi></p><pb/> The objection against limiting the time of imprisonment<lb/> for Debts on contract has no application to<lb/> debts imposed by a Court for delinquency as in the<lb/> case with damages given by a Jury in actions upon<lb/> Torts- For this has nothing to do with credit&#x2014;<lb/> In this way a man becomes often subjected to imprisonment<lb/> for life by <sic>sentince</sic> of a Jury, whether they<lb/> know of it or no, &amp; whether they design it or no.<pb/>





Revision as of 18:44, 19 January 2011

Click Here To Edit

INSOLVENCY [BR]3.

Give a sequestration of half the profits of a place requiring
skill, attendance, & unstable: Not more, least
he should not find it sufficiently worth his while
to abstain from incurring a voluntary forfeiture to-
shake them off. or by undesigning remissness. A forced
absence from the Scene of duty in such cases his doubtless
often the affect of serving the Debtor without giving
satisfaction to the Creditor. In Bankruptcy the
Assigners might be appointed Receivers and those
whom it concerned obliged to pay after due notice—
& so totus quotius upon his taking any other place—
the Debtor-Placeman's name being registered for that
purpose upon every such first occasion.

So in case of an insolvent Debtor not a Trader &
so not a Bankrupt— Any one Creditor might—
sequester upon due notice given for others to come in.

An Insolvent Debtor or Bankrupt concealing his
effects; so also a person who undertakes to exhibit an
inventory in order to procure a mitigation of a fine
may be punished as for Theft or Embezzlement, ad
valorem: such a retention after the Oath taken being
a real embezzlement, & performed without pretense of
Title


---page break---
The objection against limiting the time of imprisonment
for Debts on contract has no application to
debts imposed by a Court for delinquency as in the
case with damages given by a Jury in actions upon
Torts- For this has nothing to do with credit—
In this way a man becomes often subjected to imprisonment
for life by sentince of a Jury, whether they
know of it or no, & whether they design it or no.
---page break---




Identifier: | JB/070/282/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

282

Info in main headings field

insolvency

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23397

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in