★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>The conclusion result is that in the <add>in any such</add><lb/> | |||
question sd wahat in such <add>this or that</add> or such a case ought the law to be<lb/> | |||
in <add>the</add> character of authority, standing in the place of<lb/> | |||
specific direct and deterant arguments such as<lb/> | |||
a question of this descriptive can <unclear>never</unclear> facts to<lb/> | |||
furnish, the opinion declared as the opinion of<lb/> | |||
this or that lawyer if even if <del><gap/></del> the sincerity<lb/> | |||
of it were established, which it scarce ever can<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del>, <add>in favour of which ever side it tends</add> can eve be written any, be occasionally instilled<lb/> | |||
to any the smallest notion.</p> | |||
<p><gap/> <gap/> <lb/> could <add>occasionally</add> be bestowed upon it, of<lb/> | |||
their own rules of the rules they themselves <lb/> | |||
<del>pref</del><add>picked</add> to be governed by the matters of this sort<lb/> | |||
were fit to be observed. Opinion <add>referred to in constituting</add> used as <del>with</del><lb/> | |||
authority in the question <hi rend="underline">would be a law to such or</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">such an effect be <add>upon the whole</add> a beneficial one</hi>? instead of<lb/> | |||
enquiring out the probable good and ill effects to<lb/> | |||
be looked for in the event of its establishment , is inconst<gap/>tial<lb/> <del>the</del> evidence substituted to direct evidence: circumstantial evidence always of the<lb/> | |||
<gap/> kind substituted to whatsoever <gap/> and<lb/> | |||
specific evidence the particular<add>it happens to</add> <gap/> if the case<lb/> | |||
happens to afford.</p> | |||
<p>The lawyer whose authority is in a question<lb/> | |||
of this sort regarded as decisive is a witness whose<lb/> | |||
opinion <gap/> prouting in the character of<add>opinion if <del>in favour</del> delivered in favour of a proposed law is</add> <lb/> | |||
considered as conclusive evidence of the goodness of the proposed<lb/> | |||
Law, if in disfavour<add>condemnation</add> of it as conclusive evidence<lb/> | |||
of the badness of the proposed law.</p><pb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
The conclusion result is that in the in any such
question sd wahat in such this or that or such a case ought the law to be
in the character of authority, standing in the place of
specific direct and deterant arguments such as
a question of this descriptive can never facts to
furnish, the opinion declared as the opinion of
this or that lawyer if even if the sincerity
of it were established, which it scarce ever can
, in favour of which ever side it tends can eve be written any, be occasionally instilled
to any the smallest notion.
could occasionally be bestowed upon it, of
their own rules of the rules they themselves
prefpicked to be governed by the matters of this sort
were fit to be observed. Opinion referred to in constituting used as with
authority in the question would be a law to such or
such an effect be upon the whole a beneficial one? instead of
enquiring out the probable good and ill effects to
be looked for in the event of its establishment , is inconsttial
the evidence substituted to direct evidence: circumstantial evidence always of the
kind substituted to whatsoever and
specific evidence the particularit happens to if the case
happens to afford.
The lawyer whose authority is in a question
of this sort regarded as decisive is a witness whose
opinion prouting in the character ofopinion if in favour delivered in favour of a proposed law is
considered as conclusive evidence of the goodness of the proposed
Law, if in disfavourcondemnation of it as conclusive evidence
of the badness of the proposed law.
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/107/276/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
107 |
fallacies; law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net) |
||
|
276 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c5 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
35267 |
|||
