JB/096/121/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/121/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>other more in the state, which on the behalf of some is <lb/> in process of time converted into a reality.</p>
<p>other more in the state, which on the behalf of some is <lb/> in process of time converted into a <sic>reallity</sic>.</p>
<p> What has tendency to <add>keep up</add> generate a strong prejudice<lb/> against this reasoning ( <add>which</add> as I have found to be entertained<lb/> <add>even</add> by men of good sense) is the difficulty of<lb/> <add>keeping <gap/> aloof</add> thoroughly obstructing two considerations, the one of the<lb/> Justice<add> +</add> <note><add>+</add> A notion deeply <sic>rivetted</sic> in men's minds </note> founded as it is in many cases in the Utility<lb/> in actual life of proportioning Happiness to desert, which<lb/> will not suffer them easily to bear the proposition tho' but<lb/> for a moment share of good &amp; of a bad man ought to be<lb/> equal: the other, the unproportional<del>ity</del> Happiness to<lb/> <sic>it's</sic> external causes, the perception of which &#x2014; has <sic>engender'd</sic> &amp; maintains an aversion to the maxim &#x2014; that it is the same thing whether all have equally, or one<lb/> has all; a maxim which as we shall explain above is &#x2014; really very false when applied not to Happiness <hi rend='underline'>itself</hi>,<lb/> but to those <sic>it's</sic> <hi rend='underline'>causes</hi>.</p>  
What has tendency to <add>keep up</add> generate a strong prejudice<lb/> against this reasoning ( <add>which</add> as I have found to be entertained<lb/> <add>even</add> by men of good sense) is the difficulty of<lb/> <add>keeping entirely aloof</add> thoroughly obstructing two considerations, the one of the<lb/> Justice<add> +</add> <note><add>+</add> A notion deeply <sic>rivetted</sic> in men's minds </note> founded as it is in many cases in the Utility<lb/> in actual life of proportioning Happiness to desert, which<lb/> will not suffer them easily to bear the proposition tho' but<lb/> for a moment share of good &amp; of a bad man ought to be<lb/> equal: the other, the unproportional<del>ity</del> Happiness to<lb/> <sic>it's</sic> external causes, the perception of which &#x2014; <lb/> has <sic>engender'd</sic> &amp; maintains an aversion to the maxim &#x2014;<lb/> that it is the same thing whether all have equally, or one<lb/> has all; a maxim which as we shall explain above is &#x2014; <lb/> really very false when applied not to Happiness <hi rend='underline'>itself</hi>,<lb/> but to those <sic>it's</sic> <hi rend='underline'>causes</hi>.<pb/>  


<head>INTROD: Happiness - <sic>It's</sic> Dimensions - [BR| | ] Notes - <sic>Addible</sic>. Dimension of Numb.<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> justified. </head>  
<head>INTROD: Happiness - <sic>It's</sic> Dimensions - [BR|2 | ] Notes - <sic>Addible</sic>. Dimension of Numb.<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> justified. </head>  




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 08:15, 30 January 2011

Click Here To Edit

other more in the state, which on the behalf of some is
in process of time converted into a reallity.

What has tendency to keep up generate a strong prejudice
against this reasoning ( which as I have found to be entertained
even by men of good sense) is the difficulty of
keeping entirely aloof thoroughly obstructing two considerations, the one of the
Justice + + A notion deeply rivetted in men's minds founded as it is in many cases in the Utility
in actual life of proportioning Happiness to desert, which
will not suffer them easily to bear the proposition tho' but
for a moment share of good & of a bad man ought to be
equal: the other, the unproportionality Happiness to
it's external causes, the perception of which —
has engender'd & maintains an aversion to the maxim —
that it is the same thing whether all have equally, or one
has all; a maxim which as we shall explain above is —
really very false when applied not to Happiness itself,
but to those it's causes.
---page break---

INTROD: Happiness - It's Dimensions - [BR|2 | ] Notes - Addible. Dimension of Numb.r justified.



Identifier: | JB/096/121/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

121

Info in main headings field

introd: happiness - its dimensions

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31125

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in