JB/538/271/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/538/271/001: Difference between revisions

S.D.Croft (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
S.D.Croft (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
<p>I have received your's of 22<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></p>
<p>I have received your's of 22<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></p>


I should like the scheme of <unclear>taking</unclear> the <unclear>Russian</unclear><!-- Prussian? --> but <unclear>mightily</unclear>
<p>I should like the scheme of <unclear>taking</unclear> the <unclear>Russian</unclear><!-- Prussian? --> but <unclear>mightily</unclear>
<lb/>
- but for the reasons you mention I have no great idea of
<lb/>
<sic>it's</sic> succeeding. I will think about a method of carrying it into execution.
<lb/>
Perhaps I amy call upon Sambouski: our name i believe
<lb/>
is known to him; but I fear not in a very advantageous way. All
<lb/>
that however is mere conjecture, &amp; I have not time to mention
<lb/>
particulars.</p>
 
<p>What mean you by the Book L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Mulgrave recommended
<lb/>
you? <gap/><!-- page torn --> not that the very book I got for you? <foreign>Manuel des</foreign>
<lb/>
<foreign>Marins</foreign> I think the title of it is.</p>
 
<p>I will see about Don Jorge</p>
 
<p>If they charge you double at the Post Office for single letters,
<lb/>
complain.</p>
 
<p>I wrote to you by Peake's boy - I thought he would <add>was to</add> have
<lb/>
set out on Tuesday morning - but I found he was not to set out till
<lb/>
Tuesday night.</p>
 
<p><unclear>Here</unclear><!-- There? --> is but an indifferent 3 <sic>penn'orth</sic>.</p>
 
<p>Madam Q.S.P. has lately had a disappointment. <unclear>Banks</unclear> wrote
<lb/>
a letter to C.A. asking him to go on from Geneva with him into
<lb/>
Italy. C.A. wrote an answer <unclear>spelling</unclear> to be <unclear>treated</unclear>. <del><gap/> <gap/></del> Came
<lb/>
a civil reply, but the hint was not accepted.</p>





Revision as of 09:06, 5 September 2014

Click Here To Edit

Wednesday Decr 23 1778 Linc. Inn.

I have got for you Sunderland on Ship-building — Is it
not a Book you have been in want of? If not tell me, within
this week, and I can return it — it cost 5s.

I have received your's of 22d

I should like the scheme of taking the Russian but mightily
- but for the reasons you mention I have no great idea of
it's succeeding. I will think about a method of carrying it into execution.
Perhaps I amy call upon Sambouski: our name i believe
is known to him; but I fear not in a very advantageous way. All
that however is mere conjecture, & I have not time to mention
particulars.

What mean you by the Book Ld Mulgrave recommended
you? not that the very book I got for you? Manuel des
Marins I think the title of it is.

I will see about Don Jorge

If they charge you double at the Post Office for single letters,
complain.

I wrote to you by Peake's boy - I thought he would was to have
set out on Tuesday morning - but I found he was not to set out till
Tuesday night.

Here is but an indifferent 3 penn'orth.

Madam Q.S.P. has lately had a disappointment. Banks wrote
a letter to C.A. asking him to go on from Geneva with him into
Italy. C.A. wrote an answer spelling to be treated. Came
a civil reply, but the hint was not accepted.


This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet




Identifier: | JB/538/271/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 538.

Date_1

1778-12-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

538

Main Headings

Folio number

271

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in