JB/539/075/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/539/075/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/539/075/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/539/075/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- This page is organised in two columns --> <p>but Leonardi should have <del> <gap/> </del> <add> applied </add> to the same <lb/> Bookseller.  This much however I knew I could <lb/> <del> <gap/> </del> <add> therefore</add> venture to assure him, that Leonardi's bookseller<lb/> was not his.  He did not positively</p> <pb/> <p> 3 o'clock</p><p>This instant came your letter dated Chernobyl.<lb/>  I shall say no more about it <sic>till</sic> I <lb/> have finished my present subject.  That from <lb/> Pullawa I have never received.</p> <pb/> <p> say he should make the proposal to his bookseller,<lb/> but asked leave to call for the other <lb/> sheets: and ><add> in </add> that state of uncertainty I quitted <lb/> him.  I did not care to ask whether he intended<lb/> to write, for fear of <sic>shewing</sic> too much eagerness.</p> <p> What a blockhead I am drawling through <lb/> all these minute details about my management?<lb/> What are they all to you exclusive of the want?<lb/> The want is that he wrote immediately to his <lb/> bookseller: the very next post.  If by possibility<lb/> the Bookseller should refuse I must then propose<lb/> terms to him myself to make up what <lb/> deficiency there may be in point of inducement:<lb/>such as to take off all that remains of a certain<lb/>number of copies at the end of a certain time</p> <pb/> <p> Q.S.P> has been in a bad state of health:<lb/> a journey to Bath has set him up again:<lb/> He is now about returning.</p> <p> Oct.<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 27. 1780. </p> <p>A good decent interval of about two months <lb/> and two days! and in the mean time I have <sic>reced</sic> <lb/> <del>a</del> <add> a letter </add> from <del>Ple<gap/> </del> which I <sic>answer'd
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
</sic>, (about 3 weeks<lb/> or a month ago ) and your note from Mittan which <lb/> I proceed to answer now.  The second letter you mention <lb/> to have written from <sic>Czerbobyl</sic> never came:<lb/> here then are two that have miscarried: think <lb/> what a gap this must leave in your history, <lb/> and what a loss I must be at to know what <lb/> you have been about!  You must give me some <lb/> idea of what you have been doing at <del> <gap/> </del>, <lb/> and some account of your reception at your <lb/> hospitable friends. <del> <gap/> </del> </p> <p>You tell me of my letters having been got <lb/> into Shairpe's hands &amp; sent rambling up and down <lb/> the country, where possibly they may be lost.  This <del>the</del> <lb/>circumstance has been taken in to consideration by Q.S.P. <lb/> <add>and</add> </p> <pb/>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 09:25, 9 October 2014

Click Here To Edit

but Leonardi should have applied to the same
Bookseller. This much however I knew I could
therefore venture to assure him, that Leonardi's bookseller
was not his. He did not positively


---page break---

3 o'clock

This instant came your letter dated Chernobyl.
I shall say no more about it till I
have finished my present subject. That from
Pullawa I have never received.


---page break---

say he should make the proposal to his bookseller,
but asked leave to call for the other
sheets: and > in that state of uncertainty I quitted
him. I did not care to ask whether he intended
to write, for fear of shewing too much eagerness.

What a blockhead I am drawling through
all these minute details about my management?
What are they all to you exclusive of the want?
The want is that he wrote immediately to his
bookseller: the very next post. If by possibility
the Bookseller should refuse I must then propose
terms to him myself to make up what
deficiency there may be in point of inducement:
such as to take off all that remains of a certain
number of copies at the end of a certain time


---page break---

Q.S.P> has been in a bad state of health:
a journey to Bath has set him up again:
He is now about returning.

Oct.r 27. 1780.

A good decent interval of about two months
and two days! and in the mean time I have reced
a a letter from Ple which I answer'd , (about 3 weeks
or a month ago ) and your note from Mittan which
I proceed to answer now. The second letter you mention
to have written from Czerbobyl never came:
here then are two that have miscarried: think
what a gap this must leave in your history,
and what a loss I must be at to know what
you have been about! You must give me some
idea of what you have been doing at ,
and some account of your reception at your
hospitable friends.

You tell me of my letters having been got
into Shairpe's hands & sent rambling up and down
the country, where possibly they may be lost. This the
circumstance has been taken in to consideration by Q.S.P.
and


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/539/075/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 539.

Date_1

1780-08-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

539

Main Headings

Folio number

075

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in