JB/150/446/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/150/446/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
the refusal of a licence.  The occupier of a<lb/>
the refusal of a licence.  The occupier of a<lb/>
first rate <hi rend="underline">Tavern</hi> or <hi rend="underline">Inn</hi> is, in point of pecuniary<lb/>
first rate <hi rend="underline">Tavern</hi> or <hi rend="underline">Inn</hi> is, in point of pecuniary<lb/>
consideration, little if at all <unclear>inferior</unclear>,<lb/>
consideration, little if at all inferior,<lb/>
to the most opulent Gold and Silversmith. The <lb/>
to the most opulent Gold and Silversmith. The <lb/>
danger to which the Goldsmith would <del>be</del><add>stand</add> exposed<lb/>
danger to which the Goldsmith would <del>be</del> <add>stand</add> exposed<lb/>
is no <del>other great</del> greater than that to which the<lb/>
is no <del>other great</del> greater than that to which the<lb/>
Great Tavern and Innkeeper has always been<lb/>
Great Tavern and Innkeeper has always been<lb/>
exposed, without <del>danger</del><add>injury</add> or complaint. It is in<lb/>
exposed, without <del>danger</del> <add>injury</add> or complaint. It is in<lb/>
fact not so great: for supposing (what is scarce<lb/>
fact not so great: for supposing (what is scarce<lb/>
<unclear>supposable</unclear>) <del>that the Members of</del> <add>a</add> majority of such<lb/>
supposable) <del>that the Members of</del> <add>a</add> majority of such<lb/>
a Board should be so far led astray by <del>private</del><add>criminal</add><lb/>
a Board should be so far led astray by <del>private</del><add>criminal</add><lb/>
emnity and malice as to <del>join</del> concurr in <lb/>
emnity and malice as to <del>join</del> concurr in <lb/>
Line 24: Line 24:
reproach, especially <add>an individual of the</add> <del>a person of that</del> degree<lb/>
reproach, especially <add>an individual of the</add> <del>a person of that</del> degree<lb/>
of respectability supposed, there would at any rate<lb/>
of respectability supposed, there would at any rate<lb/>
be <del>the</del><add>an authority</add> superior to the Board, (<add>viz: </add> the <unclear>Treasury</unclear> <del>Person
be <del>the</del> <add>an authority</add> superior to the Board, (<add>viz: </add> the Treasury <del>Person
</del><lb/>
</del><lb/>
<add>or Secretary of State</add> to whose orders it would be subject) <add>by</add> <del>to</del> whom in<lb/>
<add>or Secretary of State</add> to whose orders it would be subject) <add>by</add> <del>to</del> whom in<lb/>
a case this extraordinary a complaint could hardly <lb/>
a case this extraordinary a complaint could hardly <lb/>
fail to be entertained: whereas were the great<lb/>
fail to be entertained: whereas were the great<lb/>
Tavern keeper to <add>experience the refusal</add> <del>be refused</del> a licence <del>by</del><add>from</add> the Justices,<lb/>
Tavern keeper to <add>experience the refusal</add> <del>be refused</del> a licence <del>by</del> <add>from</add> the Justices,<lb/>
there is no superior authority <add>from which</add> <del>by whose</del> the Justices<lb/>
there is no superior authority <add>from which</add> <del>by whose</del> the Justices<lb/>
could <unclear>reverse</unclear> an order to grant the licence.</p>
could reverse an order to grant the licence.<lb/></p>
<add><del>If</del></add> The<lb/><pb/>
<p><add><del>If</del></add> The<lb/></p><pb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:38, 21 October 2014

Click Here To Edit

To an unprejudiced third person who takes time
to reflect, it will hardly appear as an event
seriiously to be apprehended, that a manufacturer
of this class or of any other class, in whose
character there were no stain, should experience
from the majority of this or any other Board
the refusal of a licence. The occupier of a
first rate Tavern or Inn is, in point of pecuniary
consideration, little if at all inferior,
to the most opulent Gold and Silversmith. The
danger to which the Goldsmith would be stand exposed
is no other great greater than that to which the
Great Tavern and Innkeeper has always been
exposed, without danger injury or complaint. It is in
fact not so great: for supposing (what is scarce
supposable) that the Members of a majority of such
a Board should be so far led astray by privatecriminal
emnity and malice as to join concurr in
expelling from his business an individual without
reproach, especially an individual of the a person of that degree
of respectability supposed, there would at any rate
be the an authority superior to the Board, (viz: the Treasury Person
or Secretary of State to whose orders it would be subject) by to whom in
a case this extraordinary a complaint could hardly
fail to be entertained: whereas were the great
Tavern keeper to experience the refusal be refused a licence by from the Justices,
there is no superior authority from which by whose the Justices
could reverse an order to grant the licence.

If The


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/150/446/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

446

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / f18

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50667

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in