JB/073/091/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/073/091/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
RexL (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
like L<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Coke would fetch over <add>institutions</add> instruction<lb/>
like L<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Coke would fetch over <add>institutions</add> instruction<lb/>
<del>in</del> <add><hi rend='superscript'>in this mystery</hi></add> upon rafts from Florida or<lb/>
<del>in</del> <add><hi rend='superscript'>in this mystery</hi></add> upon rafts from Florida or<lb/>
Mexico, <note>As Indian <unclear>Britons</unclear> come from <gap/><gap/></note>  if they <del><gap/></del>did not hear by good luck<lb/>
Mexico, <note>As Indian <unclear>Britons</unclear> come from Penguins <sic>Hudibrass</sic></note>  if they <del><gap/></del>did not hear by good luck<lb/>
of its having been practised a little nearer<lb/></p>
of its having been practised a little nearer<lb/></p>
<!-- A faint horizontal line separates the following lines in this column from the lines above -->
<!-- A faint horizontal line separates the following lines in this column from the lines above -->
Line 37: Line 37:
who stand lowest in their affections, with<lb/>
who stand lowest in their affections, with<lb/>
the authorship of any custom or appearance<lb/>
the authorship of any custom or appearance<lb/>
which they find incommodious. A nation add>country</add> which<lb/>gave birth to these swarms of Locusts, whose<lb/>depradations in spite of <unclear>consuming</unclear>they<gap/><unclear>questionable reading</unclear><lb/>have for so many centuries.</p>
which they find incommodious. A nation add>country</add> which<lb/>
Tho' this <add>nauseous</add> plant languished, &amp; probably ever will<lb/>languish in this our soil, yet their are <gap/><lb/><gap/>enough in <del>deleted text</del><add>their</add>laws <note><note><foreign>Si quis volit <gap/><lb/>uxor <gap/><lb/>FITLICE <gap/></foreign><lb/> If any one attempts<lb/> to have to do with<lb/>his wife in an unfit<lb/>manner</note>  &amp;their HistoryShip lost <add>visionary</add>M Paris.</note><lb/><lb/> to shew, that our Ancestors had no occasion<lb/>to be beholden for it to the Lombards<lb/>. <note><gap/></note><pb/>
gave birth to these swarms of Locusts, whose<lb/>
depradations in spite of <unclear>consuming</unclear>they<gap/><unclear>questionable reading</unclear><lb/>
have for so many centuries.</p>
Tho' this <add>nauseous</add> plant languished, &amp; probably ever will<lb/>
languish in this our soil, yet there are testimonies<lb/>
enough in <del>deleted text</del><add>their</add>Laws<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><note><foreign><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>Si quis volit <unclear>cum</unclear> uxor <del>unfitlic</del> UNFITLICE <gap/></foreign> If any one attempts to have to do with his wife in an unfit manner</note>  &amp;their HistoryShip lost <add>visionary</add>M Paris.</note><lb/><lb/> to shew, that our Ancestors had no occasion<lb/>
to be beholden for it to the Lombards<lb/>. <note><gap/></note><pb/>





Revision as of 01:43, 6 February 2011

Click Here To Edit

NONCON>Origin of — Ld Coke

The same Jurist, very well read in the Rolls
of Parliament, but very ill read in the great
Book of Human Nature, informs us upon the
authority of those Rolls, if not LdCoke some authors gravely tell us, that this view was
brought into England by the Lombards —
I had as lief have said, that the use of
women was brought in to by the Lombards.
as if the same nation which first taught
it to the people of one country, was not able
to teach it afterwards to that the people of another.

So strong is the madness for etymologizing
running round in that circle of etymology both for words & manners, that reasoners
like Ld Coke would fetch over institutions instruction
in in this mystery upon rafts from Florida or
Mexico, As Indian Britons come from Penguins Hudibrass if they did not hear by good luck
of its having been practised a little nearer

Note to these words of Ld Coke — "excess of Dirt" — one may
well conceive that according to the old proverb &
common experience, good should strengthen add strength to the
currentof the Passions, but I should never have thought
of its changing its questionable reading

---page break---

Not but that it may be, that those who sit on
foot the partitionWhich he quotesdeleted texthad seen
it practised by some Lombards.

The good people of this nation, like the good people
of any other nation are ready enough to com-
their neighbours, &particularly those
who stand lowest in their affections, with
the authorship of any custom or appearance
which they find incommodious. A nation add>country</add> which
gave birth to these swarms of Locusts, whose
depradations in spite of consumingtheyquestionable reading
have for so many centuries.

Tho' this nauseous plant languished, & probably ever will
languish in this our soil, yet there are testimonies
enough in deleted texttheirLaws+ <note>+Si quis volit cum uxor unfitlic UNFITLICE If any one attempts to have to do with his wife in an unfit manner &their HistoryShip lost visionaryM Paris.</note>

to shew, that our Ancestors had no occasion
to be beholden for it to the Lombards
.
---page break---




Identifier: | JB/073/091/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

073

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

091

Info in main headings field

noncon. origin of - ld coke

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23931

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in