JB/063/128/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/063/128/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>EXEMPTION ACCIDENT Negligence</head>
<p>This Idea of affixing a specific &amp; proportionate punishment to negligence has been<lb/>adopted by the Legislature, but <add>unhappily</add> <del>with <gap/> inflexibility</del>, in the <add>only</add> <del>very singular</del> instance<lb/>if all others were <add>its officiary is <del>not</del> <add>particularly</add> <add>questionable</add> <del><gap/> of necessity</del>. I speak of the Statute of Queen<lb/>Ann.<add>+</add><lb/> <note>6 Ann. ch. 31 §.3 re-enacted<lb/>in 12. G.3. c.72. Building Act.</note></p>
<note>Its efficacy is not questionable<lb/>as to fires in <gap/> time because<lb/>then <add>the Author of the mischief themselves</add> <del><gap/><gap/></del><lb/>will have time to escape.<lb/>Articles <gap/><lb/><del>That is</del></note>
<p>For the Law to make any impression upon <del><gap/></del> a man, he must think of it</p>
<note>Law too narrow<lb/>has properly exempted the owner<lb/>persons for whom he must<lb/><gap/>-ay - but has not mentioned<lb/><gap/></note>




<note>Penalty should be applied to the<lb/>sufferers (except the owner<lb/>of the house whose persons is out<lb/><gap/>) i.e. to those of the<lb/>cases adjoining.</note>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 01:25, 11 November 2014

Click Here To Edit

EXEMPTION ACCIDENT Negligence

This Idea of affixing a specific & proportionate punishment to negligence has been
adopted by the Legislature, but unhappily with inflexibility, in the only very singular instance
if all others were its officiary is not <add>particularly questionable of necessity. I speak of the Statute of Queen
Ann.+
6 Ann. ch. 31 §.3 re-enacted
in 12. G.3. c.72. Building Act.

Its efficacy is not questionable
as to fires in time because
then the Author of the mischief themselves
will have time to escape.
Articles
That is

For the Law to make any impression upon a man, he must think of it

Law too narrow
has properly exempted the owner
persons for whom he must
-ay - but has not mentioned


Penalty should be applied to the
sufferers (except the owner
of the house whose persons is out
) i.e. to those of the
cases adjoining.



Identifier: | JB/063/128/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

063

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

128

Info in main headings field

exemption accident negligence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

20317

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in