JB/042/728/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/728/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<head>1825. Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 22</head><head>Constitutional Code</head>
<head>1825. Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 22</head><head>Constitutional Code</head>
<head>Information</head>
<head>Information</head>
<note>Copd</note><!-- previous note in red ink --><note>Ch XXVI Local Headman<lb/>s. Travellers dispute <lb/>settling function<lb/>Information</note><head>Information</head><add>Question</add> of the demand for a Sub Code particular <del>Pr</del> <hi rend="underline">Sub</hi><lb/><hi rend="underline">Code</hi>, <del>having for its</del> bearing relation to and denominated<lb/>from persons thus occupied, what is the cause of demand?<lb/>Answer.  The ex<gap/> need of <del><gap/></del> the maximum of<lb/>promptitude, in respect <add>of</add> whatsoever remedy is deemed to<lb/>be applied to the evils, <del>for</del> <add>to</add> which their occupation is <lb/>liable to give birth.  Of their remedy the principal,<lb/>if not sole, peculiarity, will be - the  nature of the Judication<lb/>to which the process of making application<lb/>of it shall be <del><gap/></del> <add>allowed.</add> For - the <hi rend="underline">persons</hi> who<lb/>are they, <del>that in</del> <add>who, in this instance</add> require to be taken for <del>the <gap/></del><lb/><del>subjects of</del> <gap/> in this regulation?  They are <del>all parts of</del><lb/> persons <add>of all <del><gap/></del> classes</add> without exception: <del>The <gap/> which and</del> <note>and so in regard to the wrongs which in this occasion may require to be repressed, and the correspondent right which may <add>thus</add> require to be carried into effect  Not that  <del><gap/></del> as to <hi rend="underline">wrongs</hi> and <hi rend="underline">rights</hi> the <add><gap/> that may require</add> <del><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/></del> provision nor <add>in fact</add> to <gap/> boundless as in regard to <hi rend="underline">process</hi></note>
<note>Copd</note><!-- previous note in red ink -->
<note>Ch XXVI Local Headman<lb/>s. Travellers dispute <lb/>settling function<lb/>Information</note><head>Information</head><add>Question</add> of the demand for a <del>Sub-Code</del> particular <del>Pr</del> <hi rend="underline">Sub</hi><lb/><hi rend="underline">Code</hi>, <del>having for its</del> bearing relation to and denominated<lb/>from persons thus occupied, what is the cause of demand?<lb/>Answer.  The ex<gap/> need of <del><gap/></del> the maximum of<lb/>promptitude, in respect <add>of</add> whatsoever remedy is deemed to<lb/>be applied to the evils, <del>of</del> <add>to</add> which their occupation is <lb/>liable to give birth.  Of their remedy the principal,<lb/>if not sole, peculiarity, will be - the  nature of the Judication<lb/>to which the powers of making application<lb/>of it shall be <del><gap/></del> <add>allowed.</add> For - the <hi rend="underline">persons</hi> who<lb/>are they, <del>that in</del> <add>who, in this instance</add> require to be taken for <del>the <gap/></del><lb/><del>subjects of</del> <gap/> in this regulation?  They are <del>all parts of</del><lb/> persons <add>of all <del><gap/></del> classes</add> without exception: <del>The <gap/> which and</del> <note>and so in regard to the wrongs which in this occasion may require to be repressed, and the correspondent right which may <add>thus</add> require to be carried into effect  Not that  <del><gap/></del> as to <hi rend="underline">wrongs</hi> and <hi rend="underline">rights</hi> the <add><gap/> that may require</add> <del><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/></del> provision nor <add>in fact</add> to <gap/> boundless as in regard to <hi rend="underline">process</hi></note>





Revision as of 21:10, 22 November 2014

Click Here To Edit

1825. Decr. 22Constitutional Code Information Copd Ch XXVI Local Headman
s. Travellers dispute
settling function
Information
InformationQuestion of the demand for a Sub-Code particular Pr Sub
Code, having for its bearing relation to and denominated
from persons thus occupied, what is the cause of demand?
Answer. The ex need of the maximum of
promptitude, in respect of whatsoever remedy is deemed to
be applied to the evils, of to which their occupation is
liable to give birth. Of their remedy the principal,
if not sole, peculiarity, will be - the nature of the Judication
to which the powers of making application
of it shall be allowed. For - the persons who
are they, that in who, in this instance require to be taken for the
subjects of in this regulation? They are all parts of
persons of all classes without exception: The which and and so in regard to the wrongs which in this occasion may require to be repressed, and the correspondent right which may thus require to be carried into effect Not that as to wrongs and rights the that may require provision nor in fact to boundless as in regard to process
















Identifier: | JB/042/728/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-12-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

728

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

instructions

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / d33 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

arthur moore

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

"copd"

ID Number

13651

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in