JB/042/725/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/042/725/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
<!-- The preceding note was written in red ink -->
<!-- The preceding note was written in red ink -->


<p>Of this <del>instant</del> sort of <add>incompletely impowered</add> Judiciary called<lb/>a <hi rend="underline">Conciliation Court</hi> invented in Denmark, and in<lb/> principle <del><gap/></del> <add>adopted</add> in some manner in Bonaparte's and<lb/>other Codes <add>the principle extensively has thus received a proportionately</add> <del>is generally known and approved By</del> <lb/>extensive approbation  By<lb/>Acts <!-- blank space left -->of this section, application is endeavour<lb/> to be made of <del>the <gap/> of that institution </del> it<lb/></p><p><del>Under this Act</del> <del>For it is,</del> <add>Not that, <del>like</del> under the <gap/> proposed system,</add>  supposing it in every considerable<lb/>degree to answer <del>the needs of its <gap/></del> <add>its intended purposes,</add> there can be<lb/><del>may be</del> any thing like the demand for such a judiciary<lb/>as under the system in which it <unclear>regarded</unclear><lb/> or even any in which it has been employed:<lb/></p><p>On the other hand the <gap/> given to it being maximized<lb/> can not but be much greater than in any<lb/>of these other <del><gap/></del> systems: for <add>in</add> the increasing amount of <lb/> <note>the mass of frustration delay, expense and vexation <gap/> is less and confirmed by their codes is to be found the sole warrant for the institution of a judiciary unprovided with the power of giving execution to its own decree.</note><lb/><add>As to dangers of <gap/> notwithstanding any necessitude</add><del><gap/>person <gap/> matter has in question<lb/>current power that is to be any exercise of this information function<lb/>not being given to this functionary, no dager of whi </del><gap/> <hi rend="underline">information</hi> nto being in the case given, of<lb/><del>his pleasure </del> Of any such <hi rend="underline">opinion</hi> as the <add>functionary</add> may deem<lb/>to declare, the influence will <add>in such individual <gap/></add> be <del>for</del> <gap/><lb/> to the <gap/><gap/> by the parties nor as to his<lb/>appropriate  aptitude: and, as the <del>general</del> <add>aggregate</add> mass of<lb/>useful information in the <del>country</del>territory in question<lb/>increases, this aptitude will  naturally increase along<lb/>with it.<lb/><del>What security against falshood but no power of <gap/> of carefully exercising</del><lb/><note>deficiency of trustworthiness<lb/> on the <del>part</del> <add><gap/></add> of the functionary here in question, as compared with that of the Judge Immediate, little ground of apprehension will it is believed be found.  no <gap/> power being in this case given: nor yet, as in the case of the <hi rend="underline">Danish Conciliation Court</hi> were parties compelled to belabor themselves to this uncommon judicative in their  to the <gap/> one.
<p>Of this <del>instant</del> sort of <add>incompletely impowered</add> Judiciary called<lb/>a <hi rend="underline">Conciliation Court</hi> invented in Denmark, and in<lb/> principle <del><gap/></del> <add>adopted</add> in some manner in Bonaparte's and<lb/>other Codes <add>the principle extensively has thus received a proportionately</add> <del>is generally known and approved By</del> <lb/>extensive approbation  By<lb/>Acts <!-- blank space left -->of this section, application is endeavour<lb/> to be made of <del>the <gap/> of that institution </del> it<lb/></p><p><del>Under this Act</del> <del>For it is,</del> <add>Not that, <del>like</del> under the here proposed system,</add>  supposing it in any considerable<lb/>degree to answer <del>the ends of its institution</del> <add>its intended purposes,</add> there can be<lb/><del>several</del> any thing like the demand for such a judiciary<lb/>as under the system in which it <unclear>regarded</unclear><lb/> or even any in which it has been employed:<lb/></p><p>On the other hand the extent given to it being maximized<lb/> can not but be much greater than in any<lb/>of these other <del><gap/></del> systems: for <add>in</add> the increasing amount of <lb/> <note>the mass of frustration delay, expense and vexation rated as less and confirmed by these codes is to be found the sole warrant for the institution of a judiciary unprovided with the power of giving execution to its own decree.</note><lb/><add>As to dangers of abuse notwithstanding many <gap/> deficiency of trusworthiness in the </add><del><gap/>person <gap/> matter has in question<lb/>current power that is to be any exercise of this information function<lb/>not being given to this functionary, no dager of whi </del><gap/> <hi rend="underline">information</hi> nto being in the case given, of<lb/><del>his pleasure </del> Of any such <hi rend="underline">opinion</hi> as the <add>functionary</add> may deem<lb/>to declare, the influence will <add>in such individual <gap/></add> be <del>for</del> <gap/><lb/> to the <gap/><gap/> by the parties nor as to his<lb/>appropriate  aptitude: and, as the <del>general</del> <add>aggregate</add> mass of<lb/>useful information in the <del>country</del>territory in question<lb/>increases, this aptitude will  naturally increase along<lb/>with it.<lb/><del>What security against falshood but no power of <gap/> of carefully exercising</del><lb/><note>deficiency of trustworthiness<lb/> on the <del>part</del> <add><gap/></add> of the functionary here in question, as compared with that of the Judge Immediate, little ground of apprehension will it is believed be found.  no <gap/> power being in this case given: nor yet, as in the case of the <hi rend="underline">Danish Conciliation Court</hi> were parties compelled to belabor themselves to this uncommon judicative in their  to the <gap/> one.


</note></p>
</note></p>

Revision as of 02:41, 24 November 2014

Click Here To Edit

1825. Jany. 23 Dec. 22.Procedure CodeInformation

Ch XXVI. Local Headmen
S. 17 Beneficent mediation function

These preceding pages copd this note or else eliminated

Of this instant sort of incompletely impowered Judiciary called
a Conciliation Court invented in Denmark, and in
principle adopted in some manner in Bonaparte's and
other Codes the principle extensively has thus received a proportionately is generally known and approved By
extensive approbation By
Acts of this section, application is endeavour
to be made of the of that institution it

Under this Act For it is, Not that, like under the here proposed system, supposing it in any considerable
degree to answer the ends of its institution its intended purposes, there can be
several any thing like the demand for such a judiciary
as under the system in which it regarded
or even any in which it has been employed:

On the other hand the extent given to it being maximized
can not but be much greater than in any
of these other systems: for in the increasing amount of
the mass of frustration delay, expense and vexation rated as less and confirmed by these codes is to be found the sole warrant for the institution of a judiciary unprovided with the power of giving execution to its own decree.
As to dangers of abuse notwithstanding many deficiency of trusworthiness in the person matter has in question
current power that is to be any exercise of this information function
not being given to this functionary, no dager of whi
information nto being in the case given, of
his pleasure Of any such opinion as the functionary may deem
to declare, the influence will in such individual be for
to the by the parties nor as to his
appropriate aptitude: and, as the general aggregate mass of
useful information in the countryterritory in question
increases, this aptitude will naturally increase along
with it.
What security against falshood but no power of of carefully exercising
deficiency of trustworthiness
on the part of the functionary here in question, as compared with that of the Judge Immediate, little ground of apprehension will it is believed be found. no power being in this case given: nor yet, as in the case of the Danish Conciliation Court were parties compelled to belabor themselves to this uncommon judicative in their to the one.




















Identifier: | JB/042/725/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-01-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

725

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

instructions

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d30 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13648

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in