★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1821. Aug. 4.</p> | |||
<head>Rid Yourselves of Ultramaria Titles of Letters.</head> | |||
<p>Part 1: Injury to Peninsular Span from her claim to dominion over Ultramarian Spain</p> | |||
<p>Introduction.<lb/> | |||
Titles of the Sections.</p> | |||
<p>SS1.<lb/> | |||
Indulgence <unclear>enticated</unclear>.</p> | |||
<p>SS2.<lb/> | |||
Order pursued.</p> | |||
<p>SS3.<lb/> | |||
Witness to Spanish meter's<lb/> | |||
opinions <add>against the claim</add>, A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. 1787.<lb/> | |||
Joseph Townsend.</p> | |||
<p>SS4.<lb/> | |||
Spanish Ruler's opinions<lb/> | |||
<add>against the claim</add> A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. 1787.</p> | |||
<p>SS5.<lb/> | |||
Townsend's opinion. A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. 1787.</p> | |||
<p>SS6.<lb/> | |||
Tables, showing the grounds]<lb/> | |||
of these opinions with preliminary<lb/> | |||
explanations.</p> | |||
<p>SS7.<lb/> | |||
Jeremy Bentham's opinion,<lb/> | |||
<add>against the claim,</add> A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. 1792, as applied to<lb/> | |||
France, and to distant<lb/> | |||
dependencies in general.</p> | |||
<div col end/> | |||
<div col/> | |||
<p>Part I Letter 1.<lb/> | |||
Plan of the work.</p> | |||
<p>Part I Letter 2.<lb/> | |||
Interests concerned —<lb/> | |||
preliminary distinctions.</p> | |||
<p>Part I Letter 3.<lb/> | |||
To the subject many in<lb/> | |||
Spain, the dominion w<hi rend="superscript"><hi rend="underline">d</hi><lb/> | |||
be hurtful, were Ultramarians<lb/> | |||
ever so desirous<lb/> | |||
of submitting to it: viz.<lb/> | |||
1 in a pecuniary view.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Ultramaria submissive,</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">profit none;</hi> less, great | |||
</p> | |||
<p>Part I Letter 4.<lb/> | |||
13y Ultramarian submission,<lb/> | |||
how extensive<lb/> | |||
soever, no continued receipt<lb/> | |||
of money in Spain<lb/> | |||
would be rendered probable.<lb/> | |||
The Code, if submitted<lb/> | |||
so, affords no such<lb/> | |||
probability.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Under Code, profit none.</hi></p> | |||
<p>Part I Letter 5.<lb/> | |||
Much more in proportion<lb/> | |||
as they are averse, as under<lb/> | |||
the Constitution they<lb/> | |||
can not fail to be. Causes<lb/> | |||
of such aversion enumerated —<lb/> | |||
explanation and<lb/> | |||
proof postponed.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Ultramarian submission</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">why impossible.</hi></p> | |||
<p>Part I Letter 6.<lb/> | |||
To the ruling few indeed<lb/> | |||
the claim would, in a<lb/> | |||
great degree, be profitable.<lb/> | |||
Hence, one cause of the attachment<lb/> | |||
to it.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">From claim, Ruler's profit</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">great.</hi></p> | |||
<p>Part I. Letter 7.<lb/> | |||
<note>II</note> To the subject many in<lb/> | |||
Spain, in a Constitutional<lb/> | |||
view, the claim can not<lb/> | |||
but be productive of great<lb/> | |||
evils.</p> | |||
<p>I. Anti-Constitutional.<lb/> | |||
Evil 1. Vitiating the composition<lb/> | |||
of the Cortes.<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">1. In Cortes, foreign interest</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline"><del>predominantly</del></hi> <add><del>not</del></add> obstruction. | |||
</p> | |||
<div col end/> | |||
<div col/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
1821. Aug. 4.
Rid Yourselves of Ultramaria Titles of Letters.
Part 1: Injury to Peninsular Span from her claim to dominion over Ultramarian Spain
Introduction.
Titles of the Sections.
SS1.
Indulgence enticated.
SS2.
Order pursued.
SS3.
Witness to Spanish meter's
opinions against the claim, Ao. 1787.
Joseph Townsend.
SS4.
Spanish Ruler's opinions
against the claim Ao. 1787.
SS5.
Townsend's opinion. Ao. 1787.
SS6.
Tables, showing the grounds]
of these opinions with preliminary
explanations.
SS7.
Jeremy Bentham's opinion,
against the claim, Ao. 1792, as applied to
France, and to distant
dependencies in general.
Part I Letter 1.
Plan of the work.
Part I Letter 2.
Interests concerned —
preliminary distinctions.
Part I Letter 3.
To the subject many in
Spain, the dominion w<hi rend="underline">d
be hurtful, were Ultramarians
ever so desirous
of submitting to it: viz.
1 in a pecuniary view.
Ultramaria submissive,
profit none; less, great
Part I Letter 4.
13y Ultramarian submission,
how extensive
soever, no continued receipt
of money in Spain
would be rendered probable.
The Code, if submitted
so, affords no such
probability.
Under Code, profit none.
Part I Letter 5.
Much more in proportion
as they are averse, as under
the Constitution they
can not fail to be. Causes
of such aversion enumerated —
explanation and
proof postponed.
Ultramarian submission
why impossible.
Part I Letter 6.
To the ruling few indeed
the claim would, in a
great degree, be profitable.
Hence, one cause of the attachment
to it.
From claim, Ruler's profit
great.
Part I. Letter 7.
II To the subject many in
Spain, in a Constitutional
view, the claim can not
but be productive of great
evils.
I. Anti-Constitutional.
Evil 1. Vitiating the composition
of the Cortes.
1. In Cortes, foreign interest
predominantly not obstruction.
|
Identifier: | JB/008/063/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 8. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1821-08-04 |
|||
|
008 |
rid yourselves of ultramaria |
||
|
063a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63. |
rid yourselves of ultramaria titles of letters |
||
|
002 |
part i injury to peninsular spain from her claim to dominion over ultramarian spain |
||
|
plan |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
john flowerdew colls |
|||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1819 |
|||
|
3167 |
|||
