JB/009/005/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/009/005/001: Difference between revisions

GLJWillis (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


Dear Bentham<lb/> I received your short letter last night. I am much obliged to you for thinking of my wants. I should feel them more if you had not already indulged me with the use of your edition of the Statutes. I do not wish to relinquish my <gap/> till you want it yourself but notwithstanding that, if you really have no way of disposing the copy you mention, I cannot refuse to receive <del>of</del> what you so readily offer.<lb/> <del><unclear><gap/></unclear></del> I have no news to send you. How can you expect any before the <unclear>Legion</unclear> of Parliament is fairly <unclear><gap/></unclear>. On Monday we expect a motion from Fox or some of his friends relative to the conduct of the High bailiff of Westminster. Most people agree that his conduct is irregular in <unclear>nolma</unclear>: <unclear>king</unclear> a return of the two candidates who were highest on the poll- but the great difficulty is what the House of Commons ought to do to remedy this irregularity- whether they can call the High bailiff to the bar & order <add>him</add> to make a return- or if they ought to refer it a committee under Grenville's <unclear>cut</unclear> to determine what he ought to have done & what he ought now to do. Some think that as his power expired on the day the <unclear>unit/ will</unclear> was <unclear>returnable</unclear> & no return being then made the House can only declare the election void & order a new <unclear>unit/ will</unclear> to be issued. Whatever turn it may take it is expected to be a <unclear>popular<gap/></unclear> opposition & I suppose we shall hear of it as often as they possibly can introduce it.<lb/> It is reported that Pitt means to <sic>wheal</sic> Mr Burke's out, or <unclear>allow</unclear> some part of it in order to restore the board of Trade.<lb/> S<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. James Lowther has been exceedingly offended that Lord Abergavenny was made an Earl before him, because the daughter of
<p>Dear Bentham<lb/> I received your short letter last night. I am<lb/>
much obliged to you for thinking of my wants. I should feel them more<lb/>
if you had not already indulged me with the use of your edition<lb/>
of the Statutes. I do not wish to relinquish my claim to keep it till<lb/>  
you want it yourself but notwithstanding that, if you really<lb/>
have no way of disposing the copy you mention, I cannot refuse<lb/>
to receive <del>of</del> what you so readily offer.</p>
 
<p><del><unclear><gap/></unclear></del> I have no news to send you. How<lb/>
can you expect any before the Session of Parliament is fairly<lb/>
<unclear><gap/></unclear>. On Monday we expect a motion from Fox or some of<lb/>
his friends relative to the conduct of the High bailiff of Westminster.<lb/>
Most people agree that his conduct is irregular in not making<lb/>  
a return of the two candidates who were highest on the<lb/>
poll- but the great difficulty is what the House of Commons<lb/>
ought to do to remedy this irregularity- whether they can call<lb/>
the High bailiff to the bar &amp; order <add>him</add> to make a return- or if they ought<lb/>
to refer it a committee under Grenville's act to determine what he<lb/>
ought to have done &amp; what he ought now to do. Some think<lb/>
that as his power expired on the day the writ was returnable<lb/> &amp; no return being then made the House can only declare<lb/>
the election void &amp; order a new writ to be issued. Whatever<lb/>
turn it may take it is expected to be a popular <unclear><gap/></unclear><lb/>
opposition &amp; I suppose we shall hear of it as often as they<lb/>
possibly can introduce it.</p>
 
<p>It is reported that Pitt means to <sic>wheal</sic> Mr Burke's act, or at least<lb/> some part of it in order to restore the board of Trade.</p>
<p>S<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. James Lowther has been exceedingly offended that Lord Abergavenny<lb/> was made an Earl before him, because the daughter of</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 11:01, 9 December 2014

Click Here To Edit

Dear Bentham
I received your short letter last night. I am
much obliged to you for thinking of my wants. I should feel them more
if you had not already indulged me with the use of your edition
of the Statutes. I do not wish to relinquish my claim to keep it till
you want it yourself but notwithstanding that, if you really
have no way of disposing the copy you mention, I cannot refuse
to receive of what you so readily offer.

I have no news to send you. How
can you expect any before the Session of Parliament is fairly
. On Monday we expect a motion from Fox or some of
his friends relative to the conduct of the High bailiff of Westminster.
Most people agree that his conduct is irregular in not making
a return of the two candidates who were highest on the
poll- but the great difficulty is what the House of Commons
ought to do to remedy this irregularity- whether they can call
the High bailiff to the bar & order him to make a return- or if they ought
to refer it a committee under Grenville's act to determine what he
ought to have done & what he ought now to do. Some think
that as his power expired on the day the writ was returnable
& no return being then made the House can only declare
the election void & order a new writ to be issued. Whatever
turn it may take it is expected to be a popular
opposition & I suppose we shall hear of it as often as they
possibly can introduce it.

It is reported that Pitt means to wheal Mr Burke's act, or at least
some part of it in order to restore the board of Trade.

Sr. James Lowther has been exceedingly offended that Lord Abergavenny
was made an Earl before him, because the daughter of



Identifier: | JB/009/005/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 9.

Date_1

1784-05-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

009

Main Headings

Folio number

005

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

3

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

james trail

Watermarks

w<…>

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter 499, vol. 3; also printed, with short omissions at the beginning and end in bowring, x, 135, but there misdated 22 january

ID Number

3306

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in