JB/106/087/001

Click Here To Edit

1 March 1807

Very different is the casemuch more extensive is the mischief where the subject of the ex?meres
division is the point of law. The appropriate judge of the point
of law is a permanent Judge functionary. In whateverwhicheverpart of his
mental frame, the intellectual in the moral, the error originated
the danger the presumption is is that it may be, that it will be, repeated. Individuals
whose security in respect of theirperson, reputation property, condition
in life depends upon the rectitude of his decision, see that
security shaken: a pain of apprehension, more or less intense
in proportion to the enormity of the error aberration, taken possession of invady every
bread.

This is not all. For on the question point of law
each Judge in his decision, unless otherwise impelleddirected by some
sinister nature, makes it the constant object of his endeavours
to keep his decision in a state of conformity as close as
possible, to the decisions pronounced in the same ground, or in default
of identitycompleat or the nearest to it that can be found, by
in anterior occasions, by other judges.

Identifier: | JB/106/087/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.
Date_1	1807-03-01	Marginal Summary Numbering	7-8
Box	106	Main Headings	scotch reform
Folio number	087	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e3
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	iping 1804
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	bernardino rivadavia
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1804
Notes public		ID Number	34675
Box Contents