★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
bread.</p> | bread.</p> | ||
This is not all. For on the <del>question</del> point of law<lb/> | <p>This is not all. For on the <del>question</del> point of law<lb/> | ||
each Judge in his decision, unless otherwise impelled<add>directed</add> by some<lb/> | each Judge in his decision, unless otherwise impelled<add>directed</add> by some<lb/> | ||
sinister nature, makes it the constant object of his endeavours<lb/> | sinister nature, makes it the constant object of his endeavours<lb/> | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
possible, to the decisions pronounced in the same ground, or in default<lb/> | possible, to the decisions pronounced in the same ground, or in default<lb/> | ||
of identity<add><sic>compleat</sic></add> or the nearest to it that can be found, <del>by</del><lb/> | of identity<add><sic>compleat</sic></add> or the nearest to it that can be found, <del>by</del><lb/> | ||
in <unclear>anterior</unclear> occasions, by other judges. | in <unclear>anterior</unclear> occasions, by other judges. Universally acknowledged<add>A universal sense of utility</add> <lb/> | ||
<del><gap/></del> general utility, <del>and persons</del> <unclear>creatures</unclear> with personal conscience<lb/> | |||
in the production of this effect.</p> | |||
The more uniform<add>universal</add> the prevalence of this habitual uniformity<lb/> | |||
throughout the body of the law - (the <del>law</del> rule of action<lb/> | |||
is in this case supposed to be in the state of jurisprudential law) -<lb/> | |||
the greater is the degree in which uncertainty <add>the symptoms of</add> (the hereditary<lb/> | |||
leprosy of this species of law) | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
1 March 1807
Very different is the casemuch more extensive is the mischief where the subject of the ex?meres
division is the point of law. The appropriate judge of the point
of law is a permanent Judge functionary. In whateverwhicheverpart of his
mental frame, the intellectual in the moral, the error originated
the danger the presumption is is that it may be, that it will be, repeated. Individuals
whose security in respect of theirperson, reputation property, condition
in life depends upon the rectitude of his decision, see that
security shaken: a pain of apprehension, more or less intense
in proportion to the enormity of the error aberration, taken possession of invady every
bread.
This is not all. For on the question point of law
each Judge in his decision, unless otherwise impelleddirected by some
sinister nature, makes it the constant object of his endeavours
to keep his decision in a state of conformity as close as
possible, to the decisions pronounced in the same ground, or in default
of identitycompleat or the nearest to it that can be found, by
in anterior occasions, by other judges. Universally acknowledgedA universal sense of utility
general utility, and persons creatures with personal conscience
in the production of this effect.
The more uniformuniversal the prevalence of this habitual uniformity
throughout the body of the law - (the law rule of action
is in this case supposed to be in the state of jurisprudential law) -
the greater is the degree in which uncertainty the symptoms of (the hereditary
leprosy of this species of law)
Identifier: | JB/106/087/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1807-03-01 |
7-8 |
||
106 |
scotch reform |
||
087 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e3 |
||
jeremy bentham |
iping 1804 |
||
bernardino rivadavia |
|||
1804 |
|||
34675 |
|||