JB/038/138/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/038/138/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
16<lb/>1822 July 3<lb/><head>Constitut. Code</head><note>Supreme Operative<lb/><gap/> Representative<lb/><gap/> equal</note><p><add><gap/> Reformability</add> <del>Past Reforms</del> mad equal<lb/>125 or 1.<lb/>Anglice, actual end of<lb/>Government, Monarchs<lb/>Supposed greatest happiness,<lb/>sinister sacrifice<lb/>consummate of nearly<lb/>so. by those who prefer<lb/>greatest number's to<lb/><hi rend="underline">one's</hi> happiness, a change<lb/>can not but be desired:<lb/>viz. change, substituting<lb/>to the sinister the<lb/>proper end.</p><p>126 or 2.<lb/>Proposed changes, two:<lb/>1. Parliamentary Reform<lb/>2. Revolution.<lb/>1. Representation more<lb/>popular, or another<lb/>King substituted to the<lb/>present.</p><p>Of both changes the<lb/>inaptitude follows<lb/>from what has been<lb/>said already. But to<lb/>facilitate conception<lb/>application here<lb/>follows.</p><p>127 or 3.<lb/>1. Reform is <hi rend="underline">radical</hi><lb/>or <hi rend="underline">moderate</hi>.<lb/>1. By radical, commons<lb/>House power would<lb/>be in a Representative<lb/>Democracy as<lb/>here proposed. Power<lb/>of King and Lords<lb/>untouched. By this then,<lb/>without further change,<lb/>no diminution of<lb/>misrule would be<lb/>effected.</p><p>128 or 4.<lb/>By moderate reform<lb/>in Common's House<lb/>an aristocracy w<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.<lb/>be substituted to the<lb/>existing aristocracy.<lb/>This still less<lb/>efficient.</p><pb/>129 or 5.1. By radical reforms<lb/>suppose no further<lb/>change, nothing would<lb/>be done, no change w<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.<lb/>be effected.<p>1. With his sinister<lb/>interest, King would<lb/>retain his power of<lb/>giving effect to it. Of<lb/>the whole list of abuses<lb/>not one would be<lb/>redressed. By the matter<lb/>of good converted by the<lb/>two situations, his and<lb/>commons;s into matter<lb/>of corruption, all the<lb/>evil is done. That w<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.<lb/>remain undiminished.</p><p>130 or 6.<lb/>2. So, Lord's House.<lb/>Their interest it is to<lb/>keep the matter of<lb/>corruption undiminished<lb/>the depredation<lb/>and oppression in the<lb/>benefit of which they<lb/>share. King's acts w<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.<lb/>then as now, be applied<lb/>by Lords.</p><p>131 or 7.<lb/>Objection. Reform, if<lb/>radical, will suffice.<lb/>The reform accomplished,so will be all others.<lb/>If to that purpose King<lb/>and Lords are obsequious,<lb/>so to all others.</p><p>132 or 8.<lb/>Answer. No.<lb/>1. Untouched will<lb/>remain King &amp; Lord's<lb/>powers/ From both<lb/>Offices, matter of<lb/>corruption in vast quantity<lb/>is inseparable: much<lb/>of the depredation and<lb/>oppression</p><pb/>or 8 contin<hi rend="superscript">d</hi><lb/>oppression they will<lb/>prevent the abolition of:<lb/>the rest, their power will<lb/>suffice to bring back.<p>For all this, not so much<lb/>as one <hi rend="underline">act</hi> of corruption<lb/>will be necessary.<lb/>[<gap/>. Here repeat or refer<lb/>to a list of their<lb/>pernicious powers.]</p><p>133 or 9.<lb/>Continuing Kingship<lb/>would be sanctioning<lb/>a fundamental principle<lb/>opposite to the only<lb/>justifiable one.</p><p>134 or 10.<lb/>3. By the self preferring<lb/>principle in human<lb/>nature coupled with the<lb/>power, has all the evil<lb/>been produced, causes<lb/>remaining how can<lb/>the effect cease?</p><p>135 or 11.<lb/>Incompatible with greatest<lb/>numbers greatest<lb/>happiness are both<lb/>situations, Kings &amp; Lords.</p><p>136 or 12.<lb/>Leave the situation<lb/>unchanged, you leave in full<lb/>use all the filth, moral<lb/>and intellectual, they are<lb/>supported by: viz.<lb/>1. The lying by which<lb/>superiority in virtue is<lb/>ascribed to unchangeable<lb/>superiority in vice.<lb/>2. The absurdity by which<lb/>incapacity to do wrong is<lb/>ascribed to incapacity<lb/>to do right.</p>





Revision as of 15:20, 27 January 2015

Click Here To Edit

16
1822 July 3
Constitut. CodeSupreme Operative
Representative
equal

Reformability Past Reforms mad equal
125 or 1.
Anglice, actual end of
Government, Monarchs
Supposed greatest happiness,
sinister sacrifice
consummate of nearly
so. by those who prefer
greatest number's to
one's happiness, a change
can not but be desired:
viz. change, substituting
to the sinister the
proper end.

126 or 2.
Proposed changes, two:
1. Parliamentary Reform
2. Revolution.
1. Representation more
popular, or another
King substituted to the
present.

Of both changes the
inaptitude follows
from what has been
said already. But to
facilitate conception
application here
follows.

127 or 3.
1. Reform is radical
or moderate.
1. By radical, commons
House power would
be in a Representative
Democracy as
here proposed. Power
of King and Lords
untouched. By this then,
without further change,
no diminution of
misrule would be
effected.

128 or 4.
By moderate reform
in Common's House
an aristocracy wd.
be substituted to the
existing aristocracy.
This still less
efficient.


---page break---
129 or 5.1. By radical reforms
suppose no further
change, nothing would
be done, no change wd.
be effected.

1. With his sinister
interest, King would
retain his power of
giving effect to it. Of
the whole list of abuses
not one would be
redressed. By the matter
of good converted by the
two situations, his and
commons;s into matter
of corruption, all the
evil is done. That wd.
remain undiminished.

130 or 6.
2. So, Lord's House.
Their interest it is to
keep the matter of
corruption undiminished
the depredation
and oppression in the
benefit of which they
share. King's acts wd.
then as now, be applied
by Lords.

131 or 7.
Objection. Reform, if
radical, will suffice.
The reform accomplished,so will be all others.
If to that purpose King
and Lords are obsequious,
so to all others.

132 or 8.
Answer. No.
1. Untouched will
remain King & Lord's
powers/ From both
Offices, matter of
corruption in vast quantity
is inseparable: much
of the depredation and
oppression


---page break---
or 8 contind
oppression they will
prevent the abolition of:
the rest, their power will
suffice to bring back.

For all this, not so much
as one act of corruption
will be necessary.
[. Here repeat or refer
to a list of their
pernicious powers.]

133 or 9.
Continuing Kingship
would be sanctioning
a fundamental principle
opposite to the only
justifiable one.

134 or 10.
3. By the self preferring
principle in human
nature coupled with the
power, has all the evil
been produced, causes
remaining how can
the effect cease?

135 or 11.
Incompatible with greatest
numbers greatest
happiness are both
situations, Kings & Lords.

136 or 12.
Leave the situation
unchanged, you leave in full
use all the filth, moral
and intellectual, they are
supported by: viz.
1. The lying by which
superiority in virtue is
ascribed to unchangeable
superiority in vice.
2. The absurdity by which
incapacity to do wrong is
ascribed to incapacity
to do right.




Identifier: | JB/038/138/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 38.

Date_1

1822-07-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

125 or 1 - 136 or 12

Box

038

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

138

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

purest representation inadequate

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d16

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

11775

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in