JB/002/182/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/182/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
RexL (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


11/6 Profit (if taken) by difference between Yearly<lb/>and Half Yearly Interest. I have already stated<lb/>that my having is not to assume this head of profit, and for what reasons.<pb/>In form the better judgement in this ques<lb/>-tion the best way will be to defer the  
11/6 Profit (if taken) by difference between Yearly<lb/>
and Half Yearly Interest. I have already stated<lb/>
that my <unclear>leaning</unclear> is not to assume this head of <lb/>
profit, and for what reasons.<pb/>
 
<unclear>The</unclear> form the better judgement in this question<lb/>
the best way will be to defer the consideration<lb/>
of this branch <hi rend="superscript">head <hi rend="superscript">source</hi></hi> of profit, till it has attained its
<hi rend="underline">maximum,</hi> which will not be till the close of the<lb/>
second period.




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 18:59, 31 January 2015

Click Here To Edit

11/6 Profit (if taken) by difference between Yearly
and Half Yearly Interest. I have already stated
that my leaning is not to assume this head of
profit, and for what reasons.
---page break---

The form the better judgement in this question
the best way will be to defer the consideration
of this branch head <hi rend="superscript">source</hi> of profit, till it has attained its maximum, which will not be till the close of the
second period.


Metadata:JB/002/182/001

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in