★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<add>S42 [1] [96] Page 80. [Notice of...appeal shall be given at the time,</add><del>S42 [96] [Unless</del><add>unless...grounded on some <del>fa</del> ...fact not brought</add> <del>This exception is <gap/> but being</del><lb/> | <p><add>S42 [1] [96] Page 80. [Notice of...appeal shall be given at the time,</add><del>S42 [96] [Unless</del><add>unless...grounded on some <del>fa</del> ...fact not brought</add> <del>This exception is <gap/> but being</del><lb/> | ||
<add><hi rend="underline">to light till afterwards</hi>..] This exception is new; but being</add> not only reasonabllee, but in favour of the accused,<lb/> | <add><hi rend="underline">to light till afterwards</hi>..] This exception is new; but being</add> not only reasonabllee, but in favour of the accused,<lb/> | ||
it may <add><del>probably</del> <add>perhaps<add><del>notwithstanding</del></add></add> | it may <add><del>probably</del> <add>perhaps<add><del>notwithstanding</del></add></add> | ||
</add> be allowed to pass. | </add> be allowed to pass. The case<lb/> | ||
will not often happen: but were it ever to happen,<lb/> | |||
it would be a bad thing, if it were necessary that<lb/> | |||
a defendant should continue to suffer after his<lb/> | |||
innocence has been brought to light.</p> | |||
<p>The malefactors against whom the <del>Act</del><add>Bill</add> is <unclear>levelled</unclear><lb/> | |||
bring many of them opulent , will, it is natural<lb/> | |||
to suppose, be <add>apt to be</add> troublesome with their Appeals:-<lb/> | |||
but if the power of conviction <add>is</add><del>be</del> given to a single<lb/> | |||
Magistrate, the remedy by Appeal can hardly be<lb/> | |||
refused: <del>Quere which would be but</del> nor is it<lb/> | |||
to be supposed that <del>if</del><add>when</add> the party <del><gap/></del> is really guitly<lb/> | |||
the conviction will not be <unclear>assumed</unclear>: and the costs<lb/> | |||
allowed will, it is supposed be equal or nearly<lb/> | |||
equal to the costs actually incurred: if not, <del>regen</del><lb/> | |||
provision might hereafter be made, without re<gap/><lb/> | |||
to Parliament for reimbursing the difference to the <lb/> | |||
INformer <del>but</del> (who it is supposed will almost always<lb/> | |||
be the <add><gap/>eal</add> Officer of the Board) out of the <add>share of the</add> Police Fund.</p> | |||
<p>Quere which would be most eligible in point of <gap/>?<lb/> | |||
- a <hi rend="underline">single</hi> Magistrate subject to Appeal, <lb/> | |||
or <hi rend="underline">two or more</hi> without appeal? In some places<lb/> | |||
it could be some time perhaps before two could <lb/> | |||
be got to meet.</p><pb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
S42 [1] [96] Page 80. [Notice of...appeal shall be given at the time,S42 [96] [Unlessunless...grounded on some fa ...fact not brought This exception is but being
to light till afterwards..] This exception is new; but being not only reasonabllee, but in favour of the accused,
it may probably <add>perhaps<add>notwithstanding</add>
</add> be allowed to pass. The case
will not often happen: but were it ever to happen,
it would be a bad thing, if it were necessary that
a defendant should continue to suffer after his
innocence has been brought to light.
The malefactors against whom the ActBill is levelled
bring many of them opulent , will, it is natural
to suppose, be apt to be troublesome with their Appeals:-
but if the power of conviction isbe given to a single
Magistrate, the remedy by Appeal can hardly be
refused: Quere which would be but nor is it
to be supposed that ifwhen the party is really guitly
the conviction will not be assumed: and the costs
allowed will, it is supposed be equal or nearly
equal to the costs actually incurred: if not, regen
provision might hereafter be made, without re
to Parliament for reimbursing the difference to the
INformer but (who it is supposed will almost always
be the eal Officer of the Board) out of the share of the Police Fund.
Quere which would be most eligible in point of ?
- a single Magistrate subject to Appeal,
or two or more without appeal? In some places
it could be some time perhaps before two could
be got to meet.
---page break---
Identifier: | JB/150/567/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
96 |
|||
150 |
police bill |
||
567 |
police bill |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d17 / f143 |
||
jeremy bentham |
g & ep 1794 |
||
fr3 |
|||
1794 |
|||
50788 |
|||