JB/150/567/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/567/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


<p><add>S42 [1] [96] Page 80. [Notice of...appeal shall be given at the time,</add><del>S42 [96] [Unless</del><add>unless...grounded on some <del>fa</del> ...fact not brought</add> <del>This exception is <gap/> but being</del><lb/>
<p><add>S42 [1] [96] Page 80. [Notice of...appeal shall be given at the time,</add><del>S42 [96] [Unless</del><add>unless...grounded on some <del>fa</del> ...fact not brought</add> <del>This exception is <gap/> but being</del><lb/>
<add><hi rend="underline">to light till afterwards</hi>..] This exception is new; but being</add> not only reasonabllee, but in favour of the accused,<lb/>
<add><hi rend="underline">to light till afterwards</hi>..] This exception is new; but being</add> not only reasonable, but in favour of the accused,<lb/>
it may <add><del>probably</del> <add>perhaps<add><del>notwithstanding</del></add></add>
it may <del>probably</del> <add>perhaps<add><del>notwithstanding</del></add></add>
</add> be allowed to pass.  The case<lb/>
be allowed to pass.  The case<lb/>
will not often happen: but were it ever to happen,<lb/>
will not often happen: but were it ever to happen,<lb/>
it would be a bad thing, if it were necessary that<lb/>
it would be a bad thing, if it were necessary that<lb/>
a defendant should continue to suffer after his<lb/>
a defendant should continue to <unclear>suppose</unclear> after his<lb/>
innocence has been brought to light.</p>
innocence has been brought to light.</p>


Line 22: Line 22:
allowed will, it is supposed be equal or nearly<lb/>
allowed will, it is supposed be equal or nearly<lb/>
equal to the costs actually incurred: if not, <del>regen</del><lb/>
equal to the costs actually incurred: if not, <del>regen</del><lb/>
provision might hereafter be made, without re<gap/><lb/>
provision might hereafter be made, without recourse<lb/>
to Parliament for reimbursing the difference to the <lb/>  
to Parliament for reimbursing the difference to the <lb/>  
INformer <del>but</del> (who it is supposed will almost always<lb/>
Informer <del>but</del> (who it is supposed will almost always<lb/>
be the <add><gap/>eal</add>  Officer of the Board) out of the <add>share of the</add> Police Fund.</p>
be the <add><unclear>Real</unclear></add>  Officer of the Board) out of the <add>share of the</add> Police <unclear>Fund</unclear>.</p>


<p>Quere which would be most eligible in point of <gap/>?<lb/>
<p>Quere which would be most eligible in point of efficiency?<lb/>
- a <hi rend="underline">single</hi> Magistrate subject to Appeal, <lb/>
- a <hi rend="underline">single</hi> Magistrate subject to Appeal, <lb/>
or <hi rend="underline">two or more</hi> without appeal? In some places<lb/>
or <hi rend="underline">two or more</hi> without appeal? In some places<lb/>
it could be some time perhaps before two could <lb/>
it might be some time perhaps before two could <lb/>
be got to meet.</p><pb/>
be got to meet.</p><pb/>



Revision as of 20:32, 4 February 2015

Click Here To Edit

S42 [1] [96] Page 80. [Notice of...appeal shall be given at the time,S42 [96] [Unlessunless...grounded on some fa ...fact not brought This exception is but being
to light till afterwards..] This exception is new; but being not only reasonable, but in favour of the accused,
it may probably perhaps<add>notwithstanding</add> be allowed to pass. The case
will not often happen: but were it ever to happen,
it would be a bad thing, if it were necessary that
a defendant should continue to suppose after his
innocence has been brought to light.

The malefactors against whom the ActBill is levelled
bring many of them opulent , will, it is natural
to suppose, be apt to be troublesome with their Appeals:-
but if the power of conviction isbe given to a single
Magistrate, the remedy by Appeal can hardly be
refused: Quere which would be but nor is it
to be supposed that ifwhen the party is really guitly
the conviction will not be assumed: and the costs
allowed will, it is supposed be equal or nearly
equal to the costs actually incurred: if not, regen
provision might hereafter be made, without recourse
to Parliament for reimbursing the difference to the
Informer but (who it is supposed will almost always
be the Real Officer of the Board) out of the share of the Police Fund.

Quere which would be most eligible in point of efficiency?
- a single Magistrate subject to Appeal,
or two or more without appeal? In some places
it might be some time perhaps before two could
be got to meet.


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/150/567/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

96

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

567

Info in main headings field

police bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d17 / f143

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

g & ep 1794

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

fr3

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

ID Number

50788

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in