JB/150/568/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:50, 5 February 2015

S.43{1][97] Page[Page 81.(The Judge ...shall assign, to the person undertaking such prosecution) Council....] Assign to the party injured party That
part inWhat follows in the Bill in inverted commas is copied
verbatim from the Statute 23.G.2.c.11.S.3 which
empowers Judges of Assize Misc Prices & Gaol Delivery &c to order prosecutions [+] The expression might have been minded: but to afford a shoot answer against any objection, it was thought as well to copy it as it stands.
in this way for perjurers committed on trials before
themselves. [+] The demand for such a provisionto the effect seems
not to be less in the present can than in that: especially
as the persons whom the Officers of the Board
will have to contend with are persons of the same
stamp as those who come for trial before the Judges
of Gaol Delivery abovementioned. In the attempts
made by the malefactors | against whom the
Bill is levelled, to save themselves from conviction
perjury, of course, will not be st??? at: and if
some such provisionprovision course as this were not whenmade
to which it, it would givebe apt to form itself into a system.

Identifier: \| JB/150/568/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	97-98
Box	150	Main Headings	police bill
Folio number	568	Info in main headings field	police bill
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d18 / f144
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	g & ep 1794
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	fr3
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1794
Notes public		ID Number	50789
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-S.43{1][97] <del><gap/>Page[</del><add>Page 81.(<hi rend="underline">The Judge ...shall assign, to the person undertaking such prosecution) <gap/> Council</hi>....]</add> <hi rend="underline"><del>Assign to the party injured</del></hi>  <del>party That</del><lb/>
+<p>S.43{1][97] <del><gap/>Page[</del><add>Page 81.(<hi rend="underline">The Judge ...shall assign, to the person undertaking such prosecution) <gap/> Council</hi>....]</add> <hi rend="underline"><del>Assign to the party injured</del></hi>  <del>party That</del><lb/>
 <del>part in</del><add>What</add> follows <add>in the Bill</add> in inverted commas is copied<lb/>
 <hi rend="underline"><foreign>verbatim</foreign></hi> from the Statute 23.G.2.c.11.S.3 which<lb/>
 empowers Judges of Assize <add><hi rend="underline">Misc Prices</hi> &amp; <hi rend="underline">Gaol Delivery</hi></add> &amp;c to order <unclear>prosecutions</unclear> <note><add>[+]</add> The expression might have been minded: but to afford a shoot answer against any objection, it was thought as well to copy it as it stands.</note><lb/>
 in this way for perjurers committed on trials before<lb/>
-themselves. <add>[+]</add>
+themselves. <add>[+]</add> The demand for <del>such</del> a provision<add>to the effect</add> seems<lb/>
+not to be less in the present can than in <hi rend="underline">that</hi>: especially<lb/>
+as the persons whom the Officers of the Board<lb/>
+will have to contend with are persons of the same<lb/>
+stamp as those who come for trial before the <hi rend="underline">Judges</hi><lb/>
+<hi rend="underline">of Gaol Delivery</hi> abovementioned. In the attempts<lb/>
+made by the malefactors <del>|</del> against whom the <lb/>
+Bill <add>is</add> levelled, to save themselves from conviction<lb/>
+perjury, of course, will not be st??? at: and if<lb/>
+some such <del>provision</del><add>provision</add> <del>course</del> as this were not <del>when</del><add>made</add><lb/>
+to which it, it would <del>give</del><add>be apt to form itself</add> into a system.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Views

JB/150/568/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:50, 5 February 2015

Navigation

Search