JB/541/615/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/541/615/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><unclear>tine</unclear>: but I have new since I have here at home read<lb/>


it through and what received to me in the way of<lb/>


advice was to confine it entirely to the first nine pages<lb/>
supposing that it is <hi rend="underline">that</hi> land and no other that will<lb/>
be fined on. The grand effort of all the rest I think<lb/>
must have been produced by Dundas &amp; Long having<lb/>
read it who knew and will but others knew (if they are<lb/>
at all disposed to hear) what strong arguments you have<lb/>
in store. In this case I think I should in reading it so<lb/>
reduced to Dundas, tell him you have complied with his advice<lb/>
respecting the <hi rend="underline">measure</hi> by leaving out all arguments about<lb/>
the land, trusting that <del>if <gap/> save to say</del> <unclear><sic>henever</sic></unclear> the <gap/><lb/>
in which you had them induced to start the arguments in<lb/>
favour of that land to the inclusion of any other they could<lb/>
not but have <unclear><sic>appened</sic></unclear> to him sufficiently strong.<lb/></p>
<p>But if you think it absolutely necessary to suppose they mean<lb/>
to look for other land, <del>and to</del> the printed paper it <gap/><lb/>
seem to afford <gap/> <gap/> in a <gap/> page to convince<lb/>
where conviction is <gap/>.<lb/></p>
Do pray come immediately and <add>let</add> the delay be no longer at your <gap/>.


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 19:22, 17 February 2015

Click Here To Edit

tine: but I have new since I have here at home read
it through and what received to me in the way of
advice was to confine it entirely to the first nine pages
supposing that it is that land and no other that will
be fined on. The grand effort of all the rest I think
must have been produced by Dundas & Long having
read it who knew and will but others knew (if they are
at all disposed to hear) what strong arguments you have
in store. In this case I think I should in reading it so
reduced to Dundas, tell him you have complied with his advice
respecting the measure by leaving out all arguments about
the land, trusting that if save to say henever the
in which you had them induced to start the arguments in
favour of that land to the inclusion of any other they could
not but have appened to him sufficiently strong.

But if you think it absolutely necessary to suppose they mean
to look for other land, and to the printed paper it
seem to afford in a page to convince
where conviction is .

Do pray come immediately and let the delay be no longer at your .



Identifier: | JB/541/615/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541.

Date_1

1794-10-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

541

Main Headings

Folio number

615

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in