JB/038/194/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/038/194/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1823. <del>April</del> May 14<lb/><head>Constitut. Code</head><note>1 <gap/><lb/>Ch <gap/><lb/>§ Subordinates choice<lb/>of greatest</note><p>Ch. <gap/> <gap/><lb/>§. Subordinates how chosen<lb/></p><p>1.<lb/>Three requisites requiring,<lb/>but not easy, to be made<lb/>to have place in conjunction.</p><p>1. In Superordinate's eyes,<lb/>security for appropriate<lb/>aptitude in Subordinates:<lb/>to this, unlimited power<lb/>of location and dislocation<lb/>seem necessary.</p><p>2. Actual security for d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>.<lb/>by means of public<lb/>probationary or test exercises<lb/>in the branch of<lb/>instruction appropriate<lb/>to each department.</p><p>3. Minimization of<lb/>expence, by means of<lb/>competition between<lb/>candidates.</p><p>2.<lb/>Means of reconciliation<lb/>1. Maximize the number<lb/>of probationers<lb/>who have undergone<lb/>the tests: the greater the<lb/>number, the more the<lb/>Superordinate will have<lb/>to choose out of.</p><p>3.<lb/>Example. England.<lb/>By the multitude of<lb/>Barristers, the necessity<lb/>of confining the choice<lb/>of Judges to persons so<lb/>qualified does not<lb/>deprive the Superordinate<lb/>of a sufficient latitude<lb/>of choice.</p><p>4.<lb/>2. Maximize the publicity<lb/>of the degrees of<lb/>superiority manifested<lb/>by the candidates by<lb/>means of these tests.</p><p>5.<lb/>3. Maximize at the same<lb/>time the publicity of<lb/>the offers made by each<lb/>for the situation.</p><pb/>Ch.<lb/>§. Subordinates how chosen<p>6.<lb/>Here may be two claims<lb/>on different grounds &#x2014;<lb/>A is higher than B on the<lb/>examination. B's bidding<lb/>is higher than A's.</p><p>Yet perhaps neither may<lb/>be on the whole so apt<lb/>as one whom the<lb/>superordinate knows of: for<lb/>example, both may be<lb/>deficient in moral aptitude<lb/>or in some branch of<lb/>intellectual, which the<lb/>examinations can not<lb/>very correctly show.</p><p>7.<lb/>Result recommended:<lb/>Superordinate being<lb/>responsible for his subordinates,<lb/>leave it in his<lb/>power to choose neither<lb/>A. nor B. but C, by whom<lb/>neither of these titles have<lb/>been exhibited.</p><p>8.<lb/>By fear of the Public<lb/>Opinion Tribunal added,<lb/>to his responsibility by<lb/>means of dislocatability, he<lb/>will be prevented from<lb/>choosing a favourite, in<lb/>whose instance incontestable<lb/>inaptitude in<lb/>any shape may come<lb/>to be manifested.</p><p>9.<lb/>Without need of legal<lb/>obligation, common<lb/>prudence will generally<lb/>direct his choice to the<lb/>aptest candidate: or at any<lb/>rate prevent him from<lb/>choosing an unapt favorite,<lb/>while documents so<lb/>public are testifying ag<hi rend="underline"><hi rend="superscript">st</hi><lb/>him.</p><pb/>Ch.<lb/>§. Subordinates how chosen<p>10.<lb/>With the want of the power<lb/>of dislocation, the responsibility<lb/>of superordinate<lb/>for Subordinates would be<lb/>altogether incompatible.</p><p>11.<lb/>On dislocation of a<lb/>subordinate, who has purchased<lb/>his situation, the<lb/>purchase money should be<lb/>returned him.</p><p>12.<lb/>Of those who have<lb/>undergone the examinations,<lb/>let the names and grades<lb/>be entered in a Register<lb/>Book: fresh editions<lb/>published every year.</p><p>13.<lb/>To each name add the<lb/>office he prefers, and the<lb/>purchase money he is<lb/>ready to give for it.</p><p>14.<lb/>To this Register Book w<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.<lb/>all eyes, particularly<lb/>superordinates, turn of<lb/>course on each vacancy.</p><p>15.<lb/>For offices, the functions<lb/>of which are confined to<lb/>the receipt and payment<lb/>without need of exercise<lb/>of judgment, no tests need<lb/>be required.</p><p>Sole securities requisite<lb/>and sufficient, Bondsmen,<lb/>binding themselves<lb/>to supply eventual<lb/>deficiency.</p>
<head>1823. <del>April</del> May 14<lb/>Constitut. Code</head>
 
<note>1 <gap/><lb/>Ch <gap/><lb/>§ Subordinates choice<lb/>of greatest</note>
 
<p>Ch. <gap/> <gap/><lb/>§. Subordinates how chosen<lb/></p>
<p>1.<lb/>Three requisites requiring,<lb/>but not easy, to be made<lb/>to have place in conjunction.</p>
<p>1. In Superordinate's eyes,<lb/>security for appropriate<lb/>aptitude in Subordinates:<lb/>to this, unlimited power<lb/>of location and dislocation<lb/>seem necessary.</p>
<p>2. Actual security for d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>.<lb/>by means of public<lb/>probationary or test exercises<lb/>in the branch of<lb/>instruction appropriate<lb/>to each department.</p>
<p>3. Minimization of<lb/>expence, by means of<lb/>competition between<lb/>candidates.</p>
 
<p>2.<lb/>Means of reconciliation<lb/>1. Maximize the number<lb/>of probationers<lb/>who have undergone<lb/>the tests: the greater the<lb/>number, the more the<lb/>Superordinate will have<lb/>to choose out of.</p>
 
<p>3.<lb/>Example. England.<lb/>By the multitude of<lb/>Barristers, the necessity<lb/>of confining the choice<lb/>of Judges to persons so<lb/>qualified does not<lb/>deprive the Superordinate<lb/>of a sufficient latitude<lb/>of choice.</p>
 
<p>4.<lb/>2. Maximize the publicity<lb/>of the degrees of<lb/>superiority manifested<lb/>by the candidates by<lb/>means of these tests.</p>
 
<p>5.<lb/>3. Maximize at the same<lb/>time the publicity of<lb/>the offers made by each<lb/>for the situation.</p><pb/>
 
<p>Ch.<lb/>§. Subordinates how chosen</p>
 
<p>6.<lb/>Here may be two claims<lb/>on different grounds &#x2014;<lb/>A is higher than B on the<lb/>examination. B's bidding<lb/>is higher than A's.</p>
<p>Yet perhaps neither may<lb/>be on the whole so apt<lb/>as one whom the<lb/>superordinate knows of: for<lb/>example, both may be<lb/>deficient in moral aptitude<lb/>or in some branch of<lb/>intellectual, which the<lb/>examinations can not<lb/>very correctly show.</p>
 
<p>7.<lb/>Result recommended:<lb/>Superordinate being<lb/>responsible for his subordinates,<lb/>leave it in his<lb/>power to choose neither<lb/>A. nor B. but C, by whom<lb/>neither of these titles have<lb/>been exhibited.</p>
 
<p>8.<lb/>By fear of the Public<lb/>Opinion Tribunal added,<lb/>to his responsibility  
by<lb/>means of dislocatability, he<lb/>will be prevented from<lb/>choosing a favourite, in<lb/>whose instance incontestable<lb/>inaptitude in<lb/>any shape may come<lb/>to be manifested.</p>
 
<p>9.<lb/>Without need of legal<lb/>obligation, common<lb/>prudence will generally<lb/>direct his choice to the<lb/>aptest candidate: or at any<lb/>rate prevent him from<lb/>choosing an unapt favorite,<lb/>while documents so<lb/>public are testifying ag<hi rend="underline"><hi rend="superscript">st</hi><lb/>him.</p><pb/>
 
<p>Ch.<lb/>§. Subordinates how chosen</p>
 
<p>10.<lb/>With the want of the power<lb/>of dislocation, the responsibility<lb/>of superordinate<lb/>for Subordinates would be<lb/>altogether incompatible.</p>
 
<p>11.<lb/>On dislocation of a<lb/>subordinate, who has purchased<lb/>his situation, the<lb/>purchase money should be<lb/>returned him.</p>
 
<p>12.<lb/>Of those who have<lb/>undergone the examinations,<lb/>let the names and grades<lb/>be entered in a Register<lb/>Book: fresh editions<lb/>published every year.</p>
 
<p>13.<lb/>To each name add the<lb/>office he prefers, and the<lb/>purchase money he is<lb/>ready to give for it.</p>
 
<p>14.<lb/>To this Register Book w<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.<lb/>all eyes, particularly<lb/>superordinates, turn of<lb/>course on each vacancy.</p>
 
<p>15.<lb/>For offices, the functions<lb/>of which are confined to<lb/>the receipt and payment<lb/>without need of exercise<lb/>of judgment, no tests need<lb/>be required.</p>
 
<p>Sole securities requisite<lb/>and sufficient, Bondsmen,<lb/>binding themselves<lb/>to supply eventual<lb/>deficiency.</p>





Revision as of 16:06, 4 March 2015

Click Here To Edit

1823. April May 14
Constitut. Code

1
Ch
§ Subordinates choice
of greatest

Ch.
§. Subordinates how chosen

1.
Three requisites requiring,
but not easy, to be made
to have place in conjunction.

1. In Superordinate's eyes,
security for appropriate
aptitude in Subordinates:
to this, unlimited power
of location and dislocation
seem necessary.

2. Actual security for do.
by means of public
probationary or test exercises
in the branch of
instruction appropriate
to each department.

3. Minimization of
expence, by means of
competition between
candidates.

2.
Means of reconciliation
1. Maximize the number
of probationers
who have undergone
the tests: the greater the
number, the more the
Superordinate will have
to choose out of.

3.
Example. England.
By the multitude of
Barristers, the necessity
of confining the choice
of Judges to persons so
qualified does not
deprive the Superordinate
of a sufficient latitude
of choice.

4.
2. Maximize the publicity
of the degrees of
superiority manifested
by the candidates by
means of these tests.

5.
3. Maximize at the same
time the publicity of
the offers made by each
for the situation.


---page break---

Ch.
§. Subordinates how chosen

6.
Here may be two claims
on different grounds —
A is higher than B on the
examination. B's bidding
is higher than A's.

Yet perhaps neither may
be on the whole so apt
as one whom the
superordinate knows of: for
example, both may be
deficient in moral aptitude
or in some branch of
intellectual, which the
examinations can not
very correctly show.

7.
Result recommended:
Superordinate being
responsible for his subordinates,
leave it in his
power to choose neither
A. nor B. but C, by whom
neither of these titles have
been exhibited.

8.
By fear of the Public
Opinion Tribunal added,
to his responsibility by
means of dislocatability, he
will be prevented from
choosing a favourite, in
whose instance incontestable
inaptitude in
any shape may come
to be manifested.

9.
Without need of legal
obligation, common
prudence will generally
direct his choice to the
aptest candidate: or at any
rate prevent him from
choosing an unapt favorite,
while documents so
public are testifying ag<hi rend="superscript">st
him.


---page break---

Ch.
§. Subordinates how chosen

10.
With the want of the power
of dislocation, the responsibility
of superordinate
for Subordinates would be
altogether incompatible.

11.
On dislocation of a
subordinate, who has purchased
his situation, the
purchase money should be
returned him.

12.
Of those who have
undergone the examinations,
let the names and grades
be entered in a Register
Book: fresh editions
published every year.

13.
To each name add the
office he prefers, and the
purchase money he is
ready to give for it.

14.
To this Register Book wd.
all eyes, particularly
superordinates, turn of
course on each vacancy.

15.
For offices, the functions
of which are confined to
the receipt and payment
without need of exercise
of judgment, no tests need
be required.

Sole securities requisite
and sufficient, Bondsmen,
binding themselves
to supply eventual
deficiency.




Identifier: | JB/038/194/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 38.

Date_1

1823-05-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-15

Box

038

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

194

Info in main headings field

constitut. code

Image

001

Titles

ch. administrative / subordinates how chosen

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

11831

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in