JB/150/466/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/466/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<note>28</note>
<p>
[1] Page 21 s. 7 [<hi rend="underline">It shall be lawful for his Majesty</hi>]<lb/><del>It</del> <add>After the words, <hi rend="underline">his Majesty</hi>, it</add> is common, where, <add>as here,</add> powers are given <del>as here</del> to<lb/>the Crown, to add <del><hi rend="underline">after the words his Majesty</hi>,</del> <hi rend="underline">his</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">Heirs and Successors:</hi> and the addition, if unnecessary<lb/>(which it appears to be) is worse than useless.<lb/>It can not only be necessary, consistently<lb/>with the maxim <hi rend="underline">The King never dies</hi>: accordingly<lb/>where a provision <add>relative to the Crown</add> is meant to be confined to the King<lb/>on the throne, <del>the</del> words of restriction for that purpose<lb/>such as <hi rend="underline">for the time of his Majesty's natural<lb/>life,</hi> never fail (it is believed) to be inserted.  What<lb/>renders the addition if unnecessary worse than useless<lb/>is - not merely by the surplusage, but the danger<lb/>of ambiguity: for if the addition being inserted<lb/>on one occasion, is omitted on any others,<lb/>there arises a ground for arguing, that where<lb/>Heirs and Successors are not mentioned they are<lb/>not intended.<lb/></p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 14:28, 11 March 2015

Click Here To Edit

28

[1] Page 21 s. 7 [It shall be lawful for his Majesty]
It After the words, his Majesty, it is common, where, as here, powers are given as here to
the Crown, to add after the words his Majesty, his
Heirs and Successors: and the addition, if unnecessary
(which it appears to be) is worse than useless.
It can not only be necessary, consistently
with the maxim The King never dies: accordingly
where a provision relative to the Crown is meant to be confined to the King
on the throne, the words of restriction for that purpose
such as for the time of his Majesty's natural
life,
never fail (it is believed) to be inserted. What
renders the addition if unnecessary worse than useless
is - not merely by the surplusage, but the danger
of ambiguity: for if the addition being inserted
on one occasion, is omitted on any others,
there arises a ground for arguing, that where
Heirs and Successors are not mentioned they are
not intended.














Identifier: | JB/150/466/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

28

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

466

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f38

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

g & ep 1794

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

fr3

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

ID Number

50687

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in