JB/150/472/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/472/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Judging from custom, here might <del>to</del> appear<lb/>to be a place for <add>the appointment of</add> an <hi rend="underline">Oath of Office</hi>, to be<lb/>taken by the Commissioners, with or without the<lb/>same or another Oath for their Subordinates. But<lb/>to confess the truth, the <add>sort of Oath called an</add> Oath of office is in<lb/>every instance that has <del>fallen</del> <add>happened to fall</add> under my observation<lb/>so pure a piece of oldwomanism <note><del>Oath of such a <lb/>nature as to be <lb/>seldom if ever true.</del></note><lb/> - so perfect<lb/>a chip in porridge, that I could not prevail<lb/>upon myself to <del>imitate it.</del> <add>make use of it.</add>  Besides the <add>those</add> profanationa<lb/>which are but too frequent <del>with</del> on the part of<lb/>individuals, there are two species of profanation<lb/>(for such they have appeared to me) which are<lb/>but too frequent on the part of the Legislator.<lb/>The first and most abominable is the <gap/><lb/>an oath containing an <del>assertion</del> <add>asservation which it </add> the truth of <add>such</add> which<lb/><add>is (it is known ) is seldom if ever true, or a promise</add><lb/>is impossible, or a promise <del>the execution of</del> which <lb/><del>is impracticable imperformable  or unlikely to be</del><lb/>performed the performance of which is seldom  if ever<lb/><del>likely to</del> <add>such as (it is known)</add> <del>which</del> is seldom or ever performed: <del>such</del> <add>of this</add><lb/><del>as</del> <add>kind are</add> Oaths called <hi rend="underline">Custom House Oaths</hi>, and many<lb/>others.  The other is <del>that</del> <add>the sort here</add> in question: the apparent <add>putting</add><lb/><del>under the name <add>nature</add> of <gap/></del> <add>into a man's mouth, under the name of an oath</add> a form of words<lb/><del>which meaning nothing <gap/> binds <gap/> to nothing</del> <add>which amounting to nothing can not bind a man to any</add><lb/><del>the exacting under the resounding name of an oath</del><lb/><del>a promise which amounts to nothing</del> <add>thing</add> The <gap/><lb/>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 03:49, 13 March 2015

Click Here To Edit

Judging from custom, here might to appear
to be a place for the appointment of an Oath of Office, to be
taken by the Commissioners, with or without the
same or another Oath for their Subordinates. But
to confess the truth, the sort of Oath called an Oath of office is in
every instance that has fallen happened to fall under my observation
so pure a piece of oldwomanism Oath of such a
nature as to be
seldom if ever true.

- so perfect
a chip in porridge, that I could not prevail
upon myself to imitate it. make use of it. Besides the those profanationa
which are but too frequent with on the part of
individuals, there are two species of profanation
(for such they have appeared to me) which are
but too frequent on the part of the Legislator.
The first and most abominable is the
an oath containing an assertion asservation which it the truth of such which
is (it is known ) is seldom if ever true, or a promise
is impossible, or a promise the execution of which
is impracticable imperformable or unlikely to be
performed the performance of which is seldom if ever
likely to such as (it is known) which is seldom or ever performed: such of this
as kind are Oaths called Custom House Oaths, and many
others. The other is that the sort here in question: the apparent putting
under the name nature of into a man's mouth, under the name of an oath a form of words
which meaning nothing binds to nothing which amounting to nothing can not bind a man to any
the exacting under the resounding name of an oath
a promise which amounts to nothing thing The


















Identifier: | JB/150/472/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

37

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

472

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / f4<…>

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

g & ep 1794

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

fr3

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

ID Number

50693

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in