JB/150/470/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/470/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>[9]  Page 22. §. 7. [<hi rend="underline">Shall hold their Office ... in ... the said District</hi>] <lb/>This provision <del>is</del> <add>though</add> scarcely necessary, is copied from<lb/>the <del>csse of</del> Act establishing the Excise. 12 C. 2. c. 24. §. 26 <lb/>See the Table of Precedents.<lb/></p><p>Possibly it may be thought still more advisable<lb/>to <del>pass over</del> make no mention at all in the<lb/>Bill of any of <del>these points</del> the above points relative<lb/>to the Constitution of of the Board - viz: Quorum<lb/>number - Days and Hours of attendance - <del>and</del><lb/>Salaries and place of sitting - because in that case<lb/>all these points would fall of themselves <del>within</del><lb/>(it should seem) within the discretion of the Crown.<lb/>One advantage however arises <add>may arise</add> from the mention of<lb/>them <add>in the <del>Bill</del> Act</add> - viz: that <del>there will</del> it will serve to direct<lb/>the attention of <del>Administrations</del> <add>the Executive power</add> to the several points,<lb/>and will appear to call for express regulations on the<lb/>on the subject to be made by Order of Council, grounded<lb/>in some determinate considerations: whereas otherwise <lb/>the <del>a</del> course taken with regard to these several<lb/>points might pass as it were <hi rend="underline">sub silention</hi>,<lb/>and be the work, not so much of reflection as<lb/>of chance.<lb/></p>The Crown being intrusted by the constitution itself<lb/>with the power of stationing the Courts of Law<lb/>(all but the Common Pleas) <del>whi</del> wherever it pleases, and<lb/>even the two Houses of Parliament <del>itself</del> <add>themselves,</add> it was thought<lb/>indeed if there could be an danger in intrusting it with<lb/>the power of conforming <del>itself</del> <add><del>the appointment</del></add> to the dictates of convenience<lb/>in the instance of a particular Board of<lb/>Revenue or Police.  The Stamp Office affords an instance<lb/>of the inconvenience that may result from the tying<lb/><del>down</del> the hands of the Crown in regard to a point so<lb/>little exposed to abuse - tying them <del>down</del> increases and<lb/>without any particular object in view.  On the <del>first <add>original</add> Stamp</del> <lb/><note>first <del>Act</del></note><lb/><pb/>
<p>[9]  Page 22. §. 7. [<hi rend="underline">Shall hold their Office ... in .. the said District</hi>] <lb/>This provision <del>is</del> <add>though</add> scarcely necessary, is copied from<lb/>the <del>case of</del> Act establishing the Excise. 12 C. 2. c. 24. §. 26. <lb/>See the Table of Precedents.<lb/></p><p>Possibly it may be thought still more advisable<lb/>to <del>pass over</del> make no mention at all in the<lb/>Bill of any of <del>these points</del> the above points relative<lb/>to the Constitution of of the Board - viz: Quorum<lb/>number - Days and Hours of attendance - <del>and</del><lb/>Salaries and place of sitting - because in that case<lb/>all these points would fall of themselves <del>within</del><lb/>(it should seem) within the discretion of the Crown.<lb/>One advantage however arises <add>may arise</add> from the mention of<lb/>them <add>in the <del>Bill</del> Act</add> - viz: that <del>there will</del> it will serve to direct<lb/>the attention of <del>Administrations</del> <add>the Executive power</add> to the several points,<lb/>and will appear to call for express regulations on the<lb/>subject to be made by Order of Council, grounded<lb/>in some determinate considerations: whereas otherwise <lb/>the <del>a</del> course taken with regard to these several<lb/>points might pass as it were <hi rend="underline">sub silentio</hi>,<lb/>and be the work, not so much of reflection as<lb/>of chance.<lb/></p>The Crown being intrusted by the constitution itself<lb/>with the power of stationing the Courts of Law<lb/>(all but the Common Pleas) <del>at</del> wherever it pleases, and<lb/>even the two Houses of Parliament <del>itself,</del> <add>themselves,</add> it were strange<lb/>indeed if there could be an danger in intrusting it with<lb/>the power of conforming <del>itself</del> <add><del>the appointment</del></add> to the dictates of convenience,<lb/>in the instance of a particular Board of<lb/>Revenue or Police.  The Stamp Office affords an instance<lb/>of the inconvenience that may result from the tying<lb/><del>down</del> the hands of the Crown in regard to a point so<lb/>little exposed to abuse - tying them <del>down</del> unawares and<lb/>without any particular object in view.  On the <del>first <add>original</add> Stamp</del> <lb/><note>first <del>Act</del></note><lb/><pb/>





Revision as of 15:12, 13 March 2015

Click Here To Edit

[9] Page 22. §. 7. [Shall hold their Office ... in .. the said District]
This provision is though scarcely necessary, is copied from
the case of Act establishing the Excise. 12 C. 2. c. 24. §. 26.
See the Table of Precedents.

Possibly it may be thought still more advisable
to pass over make no mention at all in the
Bill of any of these points the above points relative
to the Constitution of of the Board - viz: Quorum
number - Days and Hours of attendance - and
Salaries and place of sitting - because in that case
all these points would fall of themselves within
(it should seem) within the discretion of the Crown.
One advantage however arises may arise from the mention of
them in the Bill Act - viz: that there will it will serve to direct
the attention of Administrations the Executive power to the several points,
and will appear to call for express regulations on the
subject to be made by Order of Council, grounded
in some determinate considerations: whereas otherwise
the a course taken with regard to these several
points might pass as it were sub silentio,
and be the work, not so much of reflection as
of chance.

The Crown being intrusted by the constitution itself
with the power of stationing the Courts of Law
(all but the Common Pleas) at wherever it pleases, and
even the two Houses of Parliament itself, themselves, it were strange
indeed if there could be an danger in intrusting it with
the power of conforming itself the appointment to the dictates of convenience,
in the instance of a particular Board of
Revenue or Police. The Stamp Office affords an instance
of the inconvenience that may result from the tying
down the hands of the Crown in regard to a point so
little exposed to abuse - tying them down unawares and
without any particular object in view. On the first original Stamp
first Act

---page break---















Identifier: | JB/150/470/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

36

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

470

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / f42

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

g & ep 1794

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

fr3

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

ID Number

50691

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in