★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
of <del>anecdotes</del> incidents and occurrences, of that <add>the</add> sort<lb/> | of <del>anecdotes</del> incidents and occurrences, of that <add>the</add> sort<lb/> | ||
which comes home, and that in the closest senses<lb/> | which comes home, and that in the closest senses<lb/> | ||
to <del>ensure</del><add>the</add> business and bosoms of the readers, <add>[+]</add> <del><gap/></del> <note><add>[+]</add> materials <del><gap/></del> the <del>perpetual</del> monopoly of which is secured to it - most <sic>compleatly</sic> and at the same time | to <del>ensure</del><add>the</add> business and bosoms of the readers, <add>[+]</add> <del><gap/></del> <note><add>[+]</add> materials <del><gap/></del> the <del>perpetual</del> monopoly of which is secured to it - most <sic>compleatly</sic> and at the same time most unexceptionally secured to it</del> </note><lb/> | ||
<del>that sort of it seems to afford an <gap/>mpt of that</del><lb/> | <del>that sort of it seems to afford an <gap/>mpt of that</del><lb/> | ||
<del>an</del><add>seems to be that sort of</add> instrument though worthy of the ablest<lb/> | <del>an</del><add>seems to be that sort of</add> instrument though worthy of the ablest<lb/> | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
clumsiest.</p> | clumsiest.</p> | ||
The Bill, (it may be said) is what the<lb/> | |||
people <hi rend="underline">ought</hi> to read:- there is their best, <del><gap/><add>not</add></del><lb/> | |||
<del><add>to say</add> rather their sole</del> preservation. <add>Be it so</add> <del>Quere</del>: - but is<lb/> | |||
the conclusion just, that because they <hi rend="underline">ought</hi>, therefore<lb/> | |||
they will <hi rend="underline">read</hi> it? <add>[+]</add> <del>Alas! - the oppositite conclusion</del> <note><add>[+]</add> and that nothing should be done in aid of this preservation? Were this reasonsing just, then ought all penal laws to be abolished, since a man oughts to live honestly although there were no such laws. <del>No: the just conclusion</del></note> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
Police Revenue Bill
always new and indeed and endowed with attractions of which
the power is inherent and indestructible - asuccession set
of anecdotes incidents and occurrences, of that the sort
which comes home, and that in the closest senses
to ensurethe business and bosoms of the readers, [+] [+] materials the perpetual monopoly of which is secured to it - most compleatly and at the same time most unexceptionally secured to it
that sort of it seems to afford an mpt of that
anseems to be that sort of instrument though worthy of the ablest
hands isseems<add>is</add> incapable of being spoilt, even by the
clumsiest.
The Bill, (it may be said) is what the
people ought to read:- there is their best, not
to say rather their sole preservation. Be it so Quere: - but is
the conclusion just, that because they ought, therefore
they will read it? [+] Alas! - the oppositite conclusion [+] and that nothing should be done in aid of this preservation? Were this reasonsing just, then ought all penal laws to be abolished, since a man oughts to live honestly although there were no such laws. No: the just conclusion
Identifier: | JB/150/589/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
101 |
|||
150 |
police bill |
||
589 |
police revenue bill |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
f165 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
50810 |
|||