★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
When, <del>this power for</del> as a means of saving<lb/>the expence and jealousy attendant on pecuniary situations,<lb/>the provision for a remuneration of the<lb/>honourary kind was put into the hands of the <lb/>Draughtsman, <del>his first idea</del> looking out for a <lb/><gap/> against the sort of attack, known to<lb/>schools and thence to Senators by the name of<lb/><hi rend="underline">quizzing</hi>, his first idea was to place it under <lb/>the <del>safeguard</del> <add>guardianship</add> of an Act of Parliament, by a <hi rend="underline">non</hi>-<lb/><hi rend="underline">obstante</hi> reference to the Statute of precedency the 31<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> of Henry<lb/>the 8<hi rend="superscript">th</hi>. Upon turning to the Act, the gradation was<lb/>found unfortunately not to <del>go</del> <add><del>descen</del> <add>extend</add> low enough, being<lb/>confined to Parliament: Out of their walls, whatever<lb/>gradations <del>there</del> may be found to exist, rest<lb/>on no other basis than that of prerogative. Not<lb/>that the Prerogative rules are less determinate or less<lb/><del>firm</del> <add>fixed perhaps</add> than the Parliamentary ones: only, inasmuch as<lb/>they are not the work of Parliament, they can not<lb/>with so much propriety be specifically referred to<lb/>in an Act of Parliament.<lb/><p><del>If rank were</del> <add>Supposing rank to be</add> given, perhaps as proper a<lb/>place as any would be <del>bet</del> at the head of<lb/>"<hi rend="underline">worship</hi>" and at the tail of "<hi rend="underline">dignity</hi>": above<lb/><hi rend="underline">Colonels</hi>, <hi rend="underline">Serjeants</hi> at Law and <hi rend="underline">Doctors</hi> on the<lb/>one hand and below <hi rend="underline">Knights</hi> on the other: <add>whether</add> a<lb/>rank which, <add>like that of <hi rend="underline">Colonel</hi>,</add> man vanish with the office, <del>can not</del> <add>could</add><lb/><del>very well it should seem</del> <del>so</del> <add>in this stage of the gradation</add> be placed <add>with perfect propriety</add> above a <lb/>rank which like that of Knighthood <del>is <add>permanent and</add> indelible</del><lb/>produces a change of name and is indelible, would<lb/>be a question to be considered.<lb/></p><note>Failing</note><lb/><pb/> | |||
When, this power for as a means of saving
the expence and jealousy attendant on pecuniary situations,
the provision for a remuneration of the
honourary kind was put into the hands of the
Draughtsman, his first idea looking out for a
against the sort of attack, known to
schools and thence to Senators by the name of
quizzing, his first idea was to place it under
the safeguard guardianship of an Act of Parliament, by a non-
obstante reference to the Statute of precedency the 31st of Henry
the 8th. Upon turning to the Act, the gradation was
found unfortunately not to go descen <add>extend low enough, being
confined to Parliament: Out of their walls, whatever
gradations there may be found to exist, rest
on no other basis than that of prerogative. Not
that the Prerogative rules are less determinate or less
firm fixed perhaps than the Parliamentary ones: only, inasmuch as
they are not the work of Parliament, they can not
with so much propriety be specifically referred to
in an Act of Parliament.
If rank were Supposing rank to be given, perhaps as proper a
place as any would be bet at the head of
"worship" and at the tail of "dignity": above
Colonels, Serjeants at Law and Doctors on the
one hand and below Knights on the other: whether a
rank which, like that of Colonel, man vanish with the office, can not could
very well it should seem so in this stage of the gradation be placed with perfect propriety above a
rank which like that of Knighthood is permanent and indelible
produces a change of name and is indelible, would
be a question to be considered.
Failing
---page break---
Identifier: | JB/150/481/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
150 |
police bill |
||
481 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d6 / f57 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
50702 |
|||