JB/150/546/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/546/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/150/546/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/150/546/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- pencil annotations --> <p> + 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> 1 Inserenda <note>122</note><lb/> Observations</p><note>V. Procedure<lb/> §.38<lb/> 91<lb/> Mode of proceeding<lb/> &#x2014; Grounds in point<lb/> of reason and precedent,<lb/> for such particulars <lb/> as deviate<lb/> from the most usual<lb/> course.</note> <p> 38. [<gap/>] [<gap/> ] Page 74. [<hi rend="underline">And for levying <del>any</del> every such sum &amp;c &amp;c</hi> ]<lb/> <add>Two points here required to be provided for &#x2014; the punishment<lb/> itself and the means to be employed for producing submission to the</add> <lb/> <del>The </del> punishment. <add>The punishment</add> here provided is of a <sic><hi rend="underline">mixt</hi> </sic> nature:<lb/> and <add> such</add> <del>the</del> it must be, <add> if it is</add> to meet every man's <lb/> case.  Pecuniary punishment alone will not suffice.<lb/> It will not reach the indigent: it will not <lb/> always reach <add> even</add> the opulent with effect, where it <lb/> fails if out-weighing the profit of the <sic>offense</sic>: a<lb/> failure which can not be avoided where, the <sic>offense</sic><lb/> being habitual, the profit <add> of it</add> is unlimited, at the same <lb/> time that the penalty can not be otherwise than limited; <lb/> as <del>in the case of</del> <add> where</add> summary procedure is<lb/> <del>where a <add> pecuniary</add> penalty</del> <add><sic>employ'd</sic>, in which case a pecuniary penalty</add> beyond <del> £<gap/></del> £20, or, some<lb/> such <del><gap/></del> <add> limited amount</add> would hardly be allowed to pass.  Imprisonment<lb/> alone would not <add> perfectly</add> answer the purpose;<lb/> in case of a venial transgression it would be too<lb/> severe <del>a</del> upon a man who were able and willing<lb/> to submit to summary punishment: and it would<lb/> afford no <del> <gap/> for</del> <add> means of </add> remuneration &#x2014; <add> &#x2014; no means of engaging </add> <del> contribute nothing <add> it would leave</add></del><lb/> <del> to the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> that <gap/> which so</del> <lb/> <del>necessary to the <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>those services, without which the best law is no better than a dead letter.</add></p> <p>The <del> combination of the two</del> mode most commonly<lb/> <sic>employ'd </sic> is <del> a <hi rend="underline"> combination</hi></del><add> indeed a <add> sort of </add>aggregate</add> of the two, but<lb/> without <hi rend="underline">mixture</hi>: <del> accordingly it fails <gap/> any<lb/> large proportion. <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <add> being adequate to <gap/> </add> answering its intended</del> <lb/> <del>purpose</del>.  Distress and sale, in the first instance ; <lb/> imprisonment, <add> in default of </add> <del><gap/></del> sufficient <add> distrainable matter, </add> <del><gap/></del> but not<lb/> otherwise. <add> [+] <note>[+] The imprisonment being to <foreign><hi rend="underline">suceedanium</hi></foreign> only, not an accompaniment to the Distress and Sale, so that they can not be <sic>employ'd</sic> together, nor is there so much as an option between the two, the combination such as it is, fails in a multitude of instances of being adequate to its intended purpose</note> It seem to have been either</add> <del>It has been</del> determined or <add> at least generally</add> understood, <lb/> that <del><gap/></del> a warrant of distress must first be issued, <lb/> <add> (although it should be known that there is nothing to distrain)</add><lb/> and that warrant returned, <del> althou</del> before a warrant<lb/> of commitment can be issued.  By this means, <lb/> neither punishment reaches a man who is <hi rend="underline">not</hi> a <lb/> Housekeeper; nor yet a man who <hi rend="underline">is</hi> <add> a Housekeeper, </add> unless the <lb/> <del> inconvenie inconvenience of</del> loss of the money<lb/> happens to be a less inconvenience than that of <lb/> <add> removing</add> </p>
<!-- pencil annotations --> <p> + 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> 1 Inserenda <note>122</note><lb/> Observations</p><note>V. Procedure<lb/> §.38<lb/> 91<lb/> Mode of proceeding<lb/> &#x2014; Grounds in point<lb/> of reason and precedent,<lb/> for such particulars <lb/> as deviate<lb/> from the most usual<lb/> course.</note> <p> 38. [<gap/>] [<gap/> ] Page 74. [<hi rend="underline">And for levying <del>any</del> every such sum &amp;c &amp;c</hi> ]<lb/> <add>Two points here required to be provided for &#x2014; the punishment<lb/> itself and the means to be employed for producing submission to the</add> <lb/> <del>The </del> punishment. <add>The punishment</add> here provided is of a <sic><hi rend="underline">mixt</hi> </sic> nature:<lb/> and <add> such</add> <del>the</del> it must be, <add> if it is</add> to meet every man's <lb/> case.  Pecuniary punishment alone will not suffice.<lb/> It will not reach the indigent: it will not <lb/> always reach <add> even</add> the opulent with effect, where it <lb/> fails if out-weighing the profit of the <sic>offense</sic>: a<lb/> failure which can not be avoided where, the <sic>offense</sic><lb/> being habitual, the profit <add> of it</add> is unlimited, at the same <lb/> time that the penalty can not be otherwise than limited; <lb/> as <del>in the case of</del> <add> where</add> summary procedure is<lb/> <del>where a <add> pecuniary</add> penalty</del> <add><sic>employ'd</sic>, in which case a pecuniary penalty</add> beyond <del> £<gap/></del> £20, or, some<lb/> such <del><gap/></del> <add> limited amount</add> would hardly be allowed to pass.  Imprisonment<lb/> alone would not <add> perfectly</add> answer the purpose;<lb/> in case of a venial transgression it would be too<lb/> severe <del>a</del> upon a man who were able and willing<lb/> to submit to summary punishment: and it would<lb/> afford no <del> <gap/> for</del> <add> means of </add> remuneration &#x2014; <add> &#x2014; no means of engaging </add> <del> contribute nothing <add> it would leave</add></del><lb/> <del> to the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> that <gap/> which so</del> <lb/> <del>necessary to the <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>those services, without which the best law is no better than a dead letter.</add></p> <p>The <del> combination of the two</del> mode most commonly<lb/> <sic>employ'd </sic> is <del> a <hi rend="underline"> combination</hi></del><add> indeed a <add> sort of </add>aggregate</add> of the two, but<lb/> without <hi rend="underline">mixture</hi>: <del> accordingly it fails <gap/> any<lb/> large proportion. <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <add> being adequate to <gap/> </add> answering its intended</del> <lb/> <del>purpose</del>.  Distress and sale, in the first instance ; <lb/> imprisonment, <add> in default of </add> <del><gap/></del> sufficient <add> distrainable matter, </add> <del><gap/></del> but not<lb/> otherwise. <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] The imprisonment<lb/> being to <foreign><hi rend="underline"> suceedanium</hi></foreign><lb/> only, not an accompaniment to the Distress<lb/> and Sale, so that they can not be <lb/><sic>employ'd</sic> together, nor<lb/> is there so much as<lb/> an option between the<lb/> two, the combination<lb/> such as it is, fails in<lb/> a multitude of instances<lb/> of being adequate to<lb/> its intended purpose</note> <lb/><add> It seems to have been either</add> <del>It has been</del> determined or <add> at least generally</add> understood, <lb/> that <del><gap/></del> a warrant of distress must first be issued, <lb/> <add> (although it should be known that there is nothing to distrain)</add><lb/> and that warrant returned, <del> althou</del> before a warrant<lb/> of commitment can be issued.  By this means, <lb/> neither punishment reaches a man who is <hi rend="underline">not</hi> a <lb/> Housekeeper; nor yet a man who <hi rend="underline">is</hi> <add> a Housekeeper, </add> unless the <lb/> <del> inconvenie inconvenience of</del> loss of the money<lb/> happens to be a less inconvenience than that of <lb/> <add> removing</add> </p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 12:54, 19 March 2015

Click Here To Edit

+ 2d 1 Inserenda 122
Observations

V. Procedure
§.38
91
Mode of proceeding
— Grounds in point
of reason and precedent,
for such particulars
as deviate
from the most usual
course.

38. [] [ ] Page 74. [And for levying any every such sum &c &c ]
Two points here required to be provided for — the punishment
itself and the means to be employed for producing submission to the

The punishment. The punishment here provided is of a mixt nature:
and such the it must be, if it is to meet every man's
case. Pecuniary punishment alone will not suffice.
It will not reach the indigent: it will not
always reach even the opulent with effect, where it
fails if out-weighing the profit of the offense: a
failure which can not be avoided where, the offense
being habitual, the profit of it is unlimited, at the same
time that the penalty can not be otherwise than limited;
as in the case of where summary procedure is
where a pecuniary penalty employ'd, in which case a pecuniary penalty beyond £ £20, or, some
such limited amount would hardly be allowed to pass. Imprisonment
alone would not perfectly answer the purpose;
in case of a venial transgression it would be too
severe a upon a man who were able and willing
to submit to summary punishment: and it would
afford no for means of remuneration — — no means of engaging contribute nothing it would leave
to the that which so
necessary to the those services, without which the best law is no better than a dead letter.

The combination of the two mode most commonly
employ'd is a combination indeed a <add> sort of aggregate</add> of the two, but
without mixture: accordingly it fails any
large proportion. being adequate to answering its intended

purpose. Distress and sale, in the first instance ;
imprisonment, in default of sufficient distrainable matter, but not
otherwise. [+] [+] The imprisonment
being to suceedanium
only, not an accompaniment to the Distress
and Sale, so that they can not be
employ'd together, nor
is there so much as
an option between the
two, the combination
such as it is, fails in
a multitude of instances
of being adequate to
its intended purpose

It seems to have been either It has been determined or at least generally understood,
that a warrant of distress must first be issued,
(although it should be known that there is nothing to distrain)
and that warrant returned, althou before a warrant
of commitment can be issued. By this means,
neither punishment reaches a man who is not a
Housekeeper; nor yet a man who is a Housekeeper, unless the
inconvenie inconvenience of loss of the money
happens to be a less inconvenience than that of
removing


Identifier: | JB/150/546/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

91

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

546

Info in main headings field

2do

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / f122

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50767

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in