JB/150/501/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/150/501/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>Securities thus rather are <gap/> the empty<lb/>useless <gap/> with the appearance of efficiency<lb/> - they prevent a man from looking out <lb/>for efficient ones.<lb/></p>The mode of procedure in cases of recognizance<lb/>- <add>the <hi rend="underline">Estreat</hi>, <del>follow</del> <add>followed by</add><add> the <hi rend="underline">Sciere facias</hi> -</add> would of itself be sufficient to empty<lb/>the security of the greatest part <add>of <del>at the</del> </add> its <del>expediency</del> <add>efficiency</add> if<lb/>not the whole.  The factitious delays, which have<lb/>taken such general root in the regular branch<lb/>of procedure have been improved upon in the<lb/>case of recognizances:  and in the present <del>case,</del> <add>instance,</add><lb/>if <del>the prosecution,</del> instead of the King to whom the penalty<lb/>is given, <add>the prosecutor</add> were to receive <add>to his own use</add> the amount of <del>the penalty</del> <add>it</add><lb/><del>he</del> <add>when</add> thus levied, he would <add>in case of success</add> find himself <add>out of pocket, to</add> perhaps<lb/>ten times the amount <add>of it.</add> <del>out of pocket in csae of</del><lb/><del>success</del>  As to the Defendant<del>s</del> - the Principal and the<lb/>Surety or Sureties, it would be money to them if in case<lb/>of forfeiture of the Recognizance for <del>any offender</del> act
<p>Securities thus rather are <gap/> the empty<lb/>useless idleness with the appearance of efficiency<lb/> - they prevent a man from looking out <lb/>for efficient ones.<lb/></p>The mode of procedure in cases of recognizance<lb/>- <add>the <hi rend="underline">Estreat</hi>, <del>follow</del> <add>followed by</add><add> the <hi rend="underline">Scire facias</hi> -</add> would of itself be sufficient to empty<lb/>the security of the greatest part <add>of <del>at the</del> </add> its <del>expediency</del> <add>efficiency</add> if<lb/>not the whole.  The factitious delays, which have<lb/>taken such general root in the regular branch<lb/>of procedure have been improved upon in the<lb/>case of recognizances:  and in the present <del>case,</del> <add>instance,</add><lb/>if <del>the prosecutor,</del> instead of the King to whom the penalty<lb/>is given, <add>the prosecutor</add> were to receive <add>to his own use</add> the amount of <del>the penalty</del> <add>it</add><lb/><del>he</del> <add>when</add> thus levied, he would <add>in case of success</add> find himself <add>out of pocket, to</add> perhaps<lb/>ten times the amount <add>of it.</add> <del>out of pocket in case of</del><lb/><del>success</del>  As to the Defendants - the Principal and the<lb/>Surety or Sureties, it would be money to them if in case<lb/><add>of forfeiture of the Recognizance for <del>any offense</del> act or thing could</add><lb/><note>be made to pay the <lb/>penalty of the Recognizance <lb/>(supposing <lb/><del>then</del> it to be paid) <lb/>in the same summary <lb/>and <add>comparatively</add> unexpensive <lb/>mode as that <lb/><del><add>specially</add> appropriate for the  offense</del> <lb/>in which <lb/>the Principal is <lb/>made to pay the <lb/>particular penalty <lb/>approprated and <lb/>adapted to the particular <lb/>offense.</note><lb/>





Revision as of 20:14, 26 March 2015

Click Here To Edit

Securities thus rather are the empty
useless idleness with the appearance of efficiency
- they prevent a man from looking out
for efficient ones.

The mode of procedure in cases of recognizance
- the Estreat, follow <add>followed by the Scire facias - would of itself be sufficient to empty
the security of the greatest part of at the its expediency efficiency if
not the whole. The factitious delays, which have
taken such general root in the regular branch
of procedure have been improved upon in the
case of recognizances: and in the present case, instance,
if the prosecutor, instead of the King to whom the penalty
is given, the prosecutor were to receive to his own use the amount of the penalty it
he when thus levied, he would in case of success find himself out of pocket, to perhaps
ten times the amount of it. out of pocket in case of
success As to the Defendants - the Principal and the
Surety or Sureties, it would be money to them if in case
of forfeiture of the Recognizance for any offense act or thing could
be made to pay the
penalty of the Recognizance
(supposing
then it to be paid)
in the same summary
and comparatively unexpensive
mode as that
specially appropriate for the offense
in which
the Principal is
made to pay the
particular penalty
approprated and
adapted to the particular
offense.














Identifier: | JB/150/501/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

501

Info in main headings field

police bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4 / f77

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

g & ep 1794

Marginals

Paper Producer

fr3

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

ID Number

50722

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in