★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- This whole page has been lightly crossed through --><!-- pencil annotations --> <p> <gap/> + C<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <note><del>26</del>30</note><lb/> Police Bill <note>Preliminary<lb/> Observations</note></p> <note>Classes <gap/. <lb/> between already <lb/><del> subje</del> under the<lb/> <del><gap/></del> <gap/><lb/> of the <gap/> </note> <p>To <sic>compleat</sic> the plan, <gap/. the classes of Hawkers,<lb/> Hackney Coach-keepers, and Hackney Chair-Keepers, <lb/> whom it is necessary in the course of the present<lb/> Bill to <del> <gap/.> <add> assign</add> over to the jurisdiction of the proposed<lb/> Board of Police, for the purpose of suppressing the <lb/> two offices to which they are at present subject, there<lb/> remain the several classes of 1 Auctioneers, 2 Pawnbrokers<lb/> (as such) 3 Horse-dealers, 4 Post-Horse-Letters, and <lb/> 5 Stage-Coach-Keepers. But these being all of them<lb/> subject at present to the jurisdiction of other offices<lb/>and having all of them <del>afforded</del> <add> been <del>made</del> taken for</add> the subject matter<lb/> of regulation by existing statutes, the <del> attr <gap/></del> <lb/><del> placing them under the jurisdiction of </del> <add> transferring them from those offices to the proposed</add> <lb/> Board, would besides the danger of <gap/>, require <lb/> <del> <gap/> a <gap/> to be comprehended in the present</del> <add> such a quantity of maters <add> as</add> run according to the <gap/> </add> <lb/> <add> mode of drawing, would form too heavy a load for the present</add> <lb/> Bill: since it would be necessary <del>either</del> that the <lb/> whole mass of <add> existing</add> regulation relative to these <add> several</add> objects<lb/> should <add>either</add> be adopted <hi rend="underline"><foreign>in toto</foreign></hi> and without change<lb/> or <Add> else</add> revised, in which <add>latter</add> case so many alterations<lb/> would be requisite to adapt the existing system to <lb/> the new plan, and so-much <unclear>resitut</unclear> of Statutes<lb/> within Statutes would be necessary for the purpose,<lb/> that the <del> task would be endless</del> <gap/> and <lb/> indeed only possible course would be to establish a <lb/> new code on each <add> the subject of</add> of these occupations repeating<lb/> <del. the existing <gap/> <gap/> <gap/. <gap/> each head.</del> <add> in the <gap/> all <add> the </add> existing <del> regulations</del> Statutes <add> and <gap/. of Statutes</add> relative to that head.</add> On <lb/> this <gap/> the leaving those parts of the plan <del> <gap/> <lb/> for the f</del> out of the present Bill <add> is a sort of omission, that</add> seemed altogether<lb/> unavoidable.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
+ Cd 2630
Police Bill Preliminary
Observations
Classes <gap/.
between already
subje under the
of the
To compleat the plan, <gap/. the classes of Hawkers,
Hackney Coach-keepers, and Hackney Chair-Keepers,
whom it is necessary in the course of the present
Bill to <gap/.> assign over to the jurisdiction of the proposed
Board of Police, for the purpose of suppressing the
two offices to which they are at present subject, there
remain the several classes of 1 Auctioneers, 2 Pawnbrokers
(as such) 3 Horse-dealers, 4 Post-Horse-Letters, and
5 Stage-Coach-Keepers. But these being all of them
subject at present to the jurisdiction of other offices
and having all of them afforded been made taken for the subject matter
of regulation by existing statutes, the attr
placing them under the jurisdiction of transferring them from those offices to the proposed
Board, would besides the danger of , require
a to be comprehended in the present such a quantity of maters <add> as run according to the </add>
mode of drawing, would form too heavy a load for the present
Bill: since it would be necessary either that the
whole mass of existing regulation relative to these several objects
should either be adopted in toto and without change
or else revised, in which latter case so many alterations
would be requisite to adapt the existing system to
the new plan, and so-much resitut of Statutes
within Statutes would be necessary for the purpose,
that the task would be endless and
indeed only possible course would be to establish a
new code on each the subject of of these occupations repeating
<del. the existing <gap/. each head. in the all <add> the existing regulations Statutes and <gap/. of Statutes relative to that head.</add> On
this the leaving those parts of the plan
for the f out of the present Bill is a sort of omission, that seemed altogether
unavoidable.
|
Identifier: | JB/150/755/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
not numbered |
|||
|
150 |
police bill |
||
|
755 |
police bill |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
f30 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
[[notes_public::"superseded" [note in bentham's hand]]] |
50976 |
||
