JB/150/759/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/759/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- pencil annotations --> <p> + C<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <note>35</note><lb/> Police Bill <note>Preliminary<lb/> Observations</note></p. <note>Power of <gap/> <lb/> Power of Regulation<lb/> 21 * <del>continued</del></note> <p><del> In regard to a power of <gap/>, power, </del> <add> In the case referred to by the Committee as</add> <lb/><del> to be conferred in respect of the classes of persons</del> <add> affording a precedent of the establishment of <del>the sp</del> </add> <lb/><del> subject to it, to the class marked out as comprehended</del> <add> a power of the sort in particular question, viz: that</add> <lb/> <del> within the <gap/. <gap/> for the Board</del> <add> of Hackney Coach-Keepers, the power is not only <sic>controuled</sic> </add> <lb/> <del> the Committee have given <gap/> a reference to the</del> <add> by the [+] <note>[+] necessity <del>established</del> of <del>the</del> a concurrence on the part</note> <del> <gap/> given to</del> the four Judges as</add> <lb/> <del> case of the Stage Coach Keepers, one of the classes</del> <add> above mentioned, but what is of much more importance</add> <lb/> <del> which are already subject to the licencing powers </del> <add> confined in respect of the persons subject to it, to </add> <lb/> <del> and which it is proposed to benefit from the existing</del> <add> the particular and very narrow <gap/> over <del> <gap/> of persons</del> </add> <lb/> <del> office to the new Board.  In the instance an express </del> <add> <del>just mentioned</del> class just mentioned.</add> <lb/> <del> power of regulation over subordinate <unclear>classification</unclear></del> <lb/> <del> is given to the Commissioners, but with</del> <lb/> the condition that the <gap/. an allowance of a </del> <lb/> <del> very high authority viz: that of the four superior <add> higher</add> <lb/> <del> Judges shall be as previously <gap/> and as</del><lb/><del>persons subjected to it are formally declared to be <add> What conduct is to be considered the subject</add> </del> <lb/> <del> these powers and those only who are by virtue</del><lb/><del> the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> </del> What <gap/> the <lb/> <del> power of </del> constraint will be considered farther in:<lb/> but <add> in the meantime</add> a <del>consideration</del> circumstance that renders the <lb/> inquiry of less comment is <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note> [+] <del>exceeding</del> </note> that <add>a </add> species of subordinate<lb/> legislative authority <del> existing in hand</del> <add> is to be found</add> <lb/> <del> possession <gap/> </del> <add> conjoined</add> with the power of <del> granting to</del> <add> superintendence</add> <lb/> <del> as to pr</del> in a variety of instances, unfettered<lb/> by the necessity of any such preliminary<lb/> allowance.</p>
<!-- pencil annotations --> <p> + C<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> 2 <note>35</note><lb/> Police Bill <note>Preliminary<lb/> Observations</note></p> <note>Power of <gap/> <lb/> Power of Regulation<lb/> 21 * <del>continued</del></note> <p><del> In regard to a power of <gap/> power, </del> <add> In the case referred to by the Committee as</add> <lb/><del> to be confined in respect of the classes of persons</del> <add> affording a precedent of the establishment of <del>the sp</del> </add> <lb/><del> subject to it, to the class marked out as comprehended</del> <add> a power of the sort in particular question, viz: that</add> <lb/> <del> within the special authority of the Board</del> <add> of Hackney Coach-Keepers, the power is not only <sic>controuled</sic> </add> <lb/> <del> the Committee have given <gap/> a reference to the</del> <add> by the [+] <note>[+] necessity <del>established</del> of <del>the</del> a concurrence on the part</note> <del> <gap/> given to</del> the four Judges as</add> <lb/> <del> case of the Hackney Coach Keepers, one of the classes</del> <add> above mentioned, but what is of much more importance</add> <lb/> <del> which are already subject to the licencing powers </del> <add> confined in respect of the persons subject to it, to </add> <lb/> <del> and which it is proposed to benefit from the existing</del> <add> the particular and very narrow <gap/> over <del> <gap/> of persons</del> </add> <lb/> <del> office to the new Board.  In the instance an express </del> <add> <del>just mentioned</del> class just mentioned.</add> <lb/> <del> power of regulation over subordinate <unclear>classification</unclear></del> <lb/> <del> is given to the Commissioners, but with</del> <lb/><del> the condition that the <gap/> an allowance of a </del> <lb/> <del> very high authority viz: that of the four superior <add> higher</add> <lb/> <del> Judges shall be as previously <gap/> and as</del><lb/><del>persons subjected to it are formally declared to be <add> What conduct is to be considered the subject</add> </del> <lb/> <del> these persons and those only who are by virtue</del><lb/><del> the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> </del> What concerns this <lb/> <del> species of </del> <sic>controul</sic> will be considered farther on:<lb/> but <add> in the mean time</add> a <del>consideration</del> circumstance that renders the <lb/> inquiry of less comment is <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note> [+] <del>aceeding</del> </note> that <add>a </add> species of subordinate<lb/> legislative authority <del> existing in hand</del> <add> is to be found</add> <lb/> <del> possession <gap/> </del> <add> conjoined</add> with the power of <del> granting to</del> <add> superintendence</add> <lb/> <del> as to pr</del> in a variety of instances, unfettered<lb/> by the necessity of any such preliminary<lb/> allowance.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 11:56, 1 April 2015

Click Here To Edit

+ Cd 2 35
Police Bill Preliminary
Observations

Power of
Power of Regulation
21 * continued

In regard to a power of power, In the case referred to by the Committee as
to be confined in respect of the classes of persons affording a precedent of the establishment of the sp
subject to it, to the class marked out as comprehended a power of the sort in particular question, viz: that
within the special authority of the Board of Hackney Coach-Keepers, the power is not only controuled
the Committee have given a reference to the by the [+] [+] necessity established of the a concurrence on the part given to the four Judges as
case of the Hackney Coach Keepers, one of the classes above mentioned, but what is of much more importance
which are already subject to the licencing powers confined in respect of the persons subject to it, to
and which it is proposed to benefit from the existing the particular and very narrow over of persons
office to the new Board. In the instance an express just mentioned class just mentioned.
power of regulation over subordinate classification
is given to the Commissioners, but with
the condition that the an allowance of a
very high authority viz: that of the four superior higher
Judges shall be as previously and as

persons subjected to it are formally declared to be What conduct is to be considered the subject
these persons and those only who are by virtue
the What concerns this
species of controul will be considered farther on:
but in the mean time a consideration circumstance that renders the
inquiry of less comment is [+] [+] aceeding that a species of subordinate
legislative authority existing in hand is to be found
possession conjoined with the power of granting to superintendence
as to pr in a variety of instances, unfettered
by the necessity of any such preliminary
allowance.



Identifier: | JB/150/759/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

21*

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

759

Info in main headings field

police bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2 / f35

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50980

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in