JB/150/664/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/150/664/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
but to the dependence, <note>(a condition not to be <lb/>dispensed with)</note><lb/>and even to the <del>obloquy</del> <add>discredit</add>.<lb/>In this character of a mere measure of finance,<lb/>it might perhaps <add>be</add> removed with little or no objection:<lb/>but in that character it could not be accompanied <lb/>with either the discretionary power in regard to the<lb/>granting of the licence or the power of regulation, <note>backed with the <lb/>powers of search <lb/><del>and</del> seizure &c.</note><lb/>To these two <del>points</del> <add><del>powers</del> curbs</add>, this resistance, it is apprehended<lb/>would be violent and universal: and without these<lb/>the measure would be inoperative in the character<lb/>of a measure of police.  <del>Nor d</del> It may even be<lb/>doubted (as it should seem) whether the vexation,<lb/>(which would be <del>certain</del> uninterrupted, certain, <lb/>and extending <del>to the practices of all these trades</del> <add>over all</add><lb/>this immense variety of trades,) would not <add>in fact</add> be an overbalance<lb/>for <del>the</del> <add>utmost</add> benefit derivable from so much <lb/>of this security arrived at as depends upon this<lb/><del>item.</del> <add>article.</add>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 03:15, 15 April 2015

Click Here To Edit

but to the dependence, (a condition not to be
dispensed with)

and even to the obloquy discredit.
In this character of a mere measure of finance,
it might perhaps be removed with little or no objection:
but in that character it could not be accompanied
with either the discretionary power in regard to the
granting of the licence or the power of regulation, backed with the
powers of search
and seizure &c.

To these two points powers curbs, this resistance, it is apprehended
would be violent and universal: and without these
the measure would be inoperative in the character
of a measure of police. Nor d It may even be
doubted (as it should seem) whether the vexation,
(which would be certain uninterrupted, certain,
and extending to the practices of all these trades over all
this immense variety of trades,) would not in fact be an overbalance
for the utmost benefit derivable from so much
of this security arrived at as depends upon this
item. article.


















Identifier: | JB/150/664/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

664

Info in main headings field

police bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f11

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50885

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in