★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Example<lb/> | Example<lb/> | ||
<add>Thus</add> The word ["attributive"] <hi rend="superscript"><unclear>still</unclear></hi> in the example to which<lb/> | <add>Thus</add> The word ["attributive"] <hi rend="superscript"><unclear>still</unclear></hi> in the example to which<lb/> | ||
we still adhere the <gap/>, having stood<lb/> | we still adhere from the <gap/>, having stood<lb/> | ||
<hi rend='superscript'>in the form of an attribution</hi> as a predicate to what next <hi rend='superscript'>inferior</hi> <del>superior</del> Point,<lb/> | <hi rend='superscript'>in the form of an attribution</hi> as a predicate to what next <hi rend='superscript'>inferior</hi> <del>superior</del> Point,<lb/> | ||
now assumes the <hi rend="superscript">Grammatical</hi> office of <del><gap/></del> a Substantive & <lb/> | now assumes the <hi rend="superscript">Grammatical</hi> office of <del><gap/></del> a Substantive & <lb/> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<note>There a Mathematician might perhaps be better pleased to distinguish be the appellations of simple & <!-- Not sure of the symbol after the ampersand. Is it the same X-like sign that appears in the heading Simple x Qualified? | <note>There a Mathematician might perhaps be better pleased to distinguish be the appellations of simple & <!-- Not sure of the symbol after the ampersand. Is it the same X-like sign that appears in the heading Simple x Qualified? What is meant by it?--><hi rend="underline">affected.</hi></note> | ||
These in the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> of its next <hi rend="superscript">superior</hi> <gap/>inferior<lb/> | These in the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> of its next <hi rend="superscript">superior</hi> <gap/>inferior<lb/> | ||
TABULATION. Attributives Simple x Qualified
The words attributives employ'd in
this method of Tabulation, may be either
Simple, or as it will qualified much more frequently happen, qualified
Example
Thus The word ["attributive"] still in the example to which
we still adhere from the , having stood
in the form of an attribution as a predicate to what next inferior superior Point,
now assumes the Grammatical office of a Substantive &
the Logical use of a Subject to other attributives
predicated of it in it's turn.
There a Mathematician might perhaps be better pleased to distinguish be the appellations of simple & affected.
These in the 1st of its next superior inferior
Branches the attributives "Signicative" &
"inclusive" coupled by a conjunction in the 2d of them Not-inclusives —
But Significative of what? Inclusive
of what? Not-inclusive of what? Not Significative
of any thing, Inclusive of any thing, Not inclusive
of any thing, as would be the case if
the several Attributives were simple but (in the
first Branch) significative attributives of certain pertain
|
Identifier: | JB/070/156/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
070 |
of laws in general |
||
|
156 |
tabulation. attributives simple & qualified |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[partial lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
|
23271 |
|||
