★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
§. 27: <add>[ 3 ] [ 77 ] - Page 52.</add> <del>Inscripti [ Book keeping <add><gap/> ]</add></del> [ <hi rend="underline">manner of his coming by the<lb/>article</hi> ] <del>p. 52.</del> This is one of these heads, which, to <lb/>be applied to practice, would require a multitude<lb/>of subdivisions and explanations, such as might be<lb/>framed to a very good purpose by a permanent Board, especially <lb/>with the help of experience, but which if<lb/>sufficiently <add>precise and</add> ample for the purpose, would run into a<lb/>length of <del>minute</del> detail far too minute for an Act <lb/>of Parliament. A <del>set</del> <add>string</add> of questions would require to be framed,<lb/>branching out into other questions corresponding<lb/>to the several variations of which the answers to the<lb/>first <del>set of</del> string of questions would be susceptible: a<lb/>part, <add>and but a part,</add> of the business would be, the framing a compleat<lb/>list of the several <add>events <del>to</del> admitted by the law in the character of</add> <hi rend="underline">efficient causes of title</hi> <del>to things in</del><lb/><add>with reference to</add> the <add>several sorts</add> <del>species</del> of things in question. A question that here<lb/>occurrs is - why <add>then</add> admitt so complex a head of inquiry?<lb/>- The answer is - that <add>in point of <hi rend="underline">utility</hi></add> it is really necessary,<lb/>and in point of <hi rend="underline">precedent</hi>, it is a head of<lb/>inquiry that has been prescribed <add>in the Statute Book</add> on a variety of occasions.<lb/>The occasion of taking <del>an</del> <hi rend="underline">examinations</hi> under<lb/>this head occurrs frequently to Magistrates, <del>in</del> whose<lb/>superiority of intelligence may be supposed capable of<lb/>conducting them through the business without instructions<lb/>from any other quarter. But where the person by whom <lb/>the examination is to be taken is a low Shop-keeper,<lb/>unless he has some such instructions for his guidance,<lb/>he will <del>frequently be</del> <add>oftentimes be really</add> puzzled and perplexed by the<lb/>answers he receives, or <del>if he be dishonest, he</del> will still <lb/>more frequently pretend to be so, if dishonest. The thing <add>needful</add> to <lb/><note>be</note>< | <head>Police Revenue Bill</head> | ||
<note>Observations<lb/> | |||
IV. Regulations<lb/> | |||
§. 25<lb/> | |||
77<lb/> | |||
Heads, the <gap/><lb/> | |||
under which can<lb/> | |||
not so well be<lb/> | |||
settled by Parliament,<lb/> | |||
as by the<lb/> | |||
Board</note> | |||
<p>§. 27: <add>[ 3 ] [ 77 ] - Page 52.</add> <del>Inscripti [ Book keeping <add><gap/> ]</add></del> [ <hi rend="underline">manner of his coming by the<lb/>article</hi> ] <del>p. 52.</del> This is one of these heads, which, to <lb/>be applied to practice, would require a multitude<lb/>of subdivisions and explanations, such as might be<lb/>framed to a very good purpose by a permanent Board, especially <lb/>with the help of experience, but which if<lb/>sufficiently <add>precise and</add> ample for the purpose, would run into a<lb/>length of <del>minute</del> detail far too minute for an Act <lb/>of Parliament. A <del>set</del> <add>string</add> of questions would require to be framed,<lb/>branching out into other questions corresponding<lb/>to the several variations of which the answers to the<lb/>first <del>set of</del> string of questions would be susceptible: a<lb/>part, <add>and but a part,</add> of the business would be, the framing a compleat<lb/>list of the several <add>events <del>to</del> admitted by the law in the character of</add> <hi rend="underline">efficient causes of title</hi> <del>to things in</del><lb/><add>with reference to</add> the <add>several sorts</add> <del>species</del> of things in question. A question that here<lb/>occurrs is - why <add>then</add> admitt so complex a head of inquiry?<lb/>- The answer is - that <add>in point of <hi rend="underline">utility</hi></add> it is really necessary,<lb/>and in point of <hi rend="underline">precedent</hi>, it is a head of<lb/>inquiry that has been prescribed <add>in the Statute Book</add> on a variety of occasions.<lb/>The occasion of taking <del>an</del> <hi rend="underline">examinations</hi> under<lb/>this head occurrs frequently to Magistrates, <del>in</del> whose<lb/>superiority of intelligence may be supposed capable of<lb/>conducting them through the business without instructions<lb/>from any other quarter. But where the person by whom <lb/>the examination is to be taken is a low Shop-keeper,<lb/>unless he has some such instructions for his guidance,<lb/>he will <del>frequently be</del> <add>oftentimes be really</add> puzzled and perplexed by the<lb/>answers he receives, or <del>if he be dishonest, he</del> will still <lb/>more frequently pretend to be so, if dishonest. The thing <add>needful</add> to <lb/><note>be</note></p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
Police Revenue Bill
Observations
IV. Regulations
§. 25
77
Heads, the
under which can
not so well be
settled by Parliament,
as by the
Board
§. 27: [ 3 ] [ 77 ] - Page 52. Inscripti [ Book keeping ] [ manner of his coming by the
article ] p. 52. This is one of these heads, which, to
be applied to practice, would require a multitude
of subdivisions and explanations, such as might be
framed to a very good purpose by a permanent Board, especially
with the help of experience, but which if
sufficiently precise and ample for the purpose, would run into a
length of minute detail far too minute for an Act
of Parliament. A set string of questions would require to be framed,
branching out into other questions corresponding
to the several variations of which the answers to the
first set of string of questions would be susceptible: a
part, and but a part, of the business would be, the framing a compleat
list of the several events to admitted by the law in the character of efficient causes of title to things in
with reference to the several sorts species of things in question. A question that here
occurrs is - why then admitt so complex a head of inquiry?
- The answer is - that in point of utility it is really necessary,
and in point of precedent, it is a head of
inquiry that has been prescribed in the Statute Book on a variety of occasions.
The occasion of taking an examinations under
this head occurrs frequently to Magistrates, in whose
superiority of intelligence may be supposed capable of
conducting them through the business without instructions
from any other quarter. But where the person by whom
the examination is to be taken is a low Shop-keeper,
unless he has some such instructions for his guidance,
he will frequently be oftentimes be really puzzled and perplexed by the
answers he receives, or if he be dishonest, he will still
more frequently pretend to be so, if dishonest. The thing needful to
be
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/150/526/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
77 |
|||
|
150 |
police bill |
||
|
526 |
police revenue bill |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
b9 / f102 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
50747 |
|||
