JB/150/538/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/538/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/150/538/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/150/538/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- pencil annotations --> <p> +C<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> 3 <note>114</note><lb/> Police Revenue Bill <note>Observations</note> </p> <note>V. Penalties<lb/> §. 34<lb/> 86</note><lb/> <note>Precedents of<lb/> powers for searching<lb/> the House,<lb/> without charge<lb/> against any<lb/> particular person </note> <p> §. 34 [1] <add> [86] Page 67.<del>0</del> [..Goods stolen...warrant...to make search]</add> <del>[Search]</del> In general, search can not be made<lb/> <add> by warrant</add> for stolen goods, unless there be a <del>charge</del> <add> deposition</add> upon oath, against<lb/> a <del>pe</del> particular person, <del>of</del> <add> charging him with</add> felony committed in respect<lb/> of such goods.  By the Stolen-Metal Acts <add> [+]</add> <note>[+] 29.G.2.c.30. §.2; and 22.G.3.c.58.§.2</note> this<lb/> condition is dispensed with in the instance of goods<lb/> of that particular description; but if the dispensation<lb/> is proper in the instance of that particular class of <lb/> goods, it can hardly be otherwise than proper in the <lb/> instance of any other class of goods.  The clause <lb/> to this purpose, though thus general in respect to <lb/> <hi rend="underline"> persons</hi>, yet appeared to have so intimate a connection<lb/> with the system which <add> it</add> is the <del>particular</del> object<lb/> of <del> the Bill</del> <add> the present Bill to institute</add>, and in particular with the <add> matter of the </add> last <lb/> preceding clause, that (in conformity to the Instructions)<lb/> <del>it</del> <add>I</add> have <del>been</del> inserted it without scruple.</p>
<!-- pencil annotations -->  
 
<p> +C<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> 3 <note>114</note><lb/> Police Revenue Bill <note>Observations</note> </p> <note>V. Penalties<lb/> §. 34<lb/> 86</note><lb/> <note>Precedents of<lb/> powers for searching<lb/> the House,<lb/> without charge<lb/> against any<lb/> particular person </note> <p> §. 34 [1] <add> [86] Page 67.<del>0</del> [..Goods stolen...warrant...to make search]</add> <del>[Search]</del> In general, search can not be made<lb/> <add> by warrant</add> for stolen goods, unless there be a <del>charge</del> <add> deposition</add> upon oath, against<lb/> a <del>pe</del> particular person, <del>of</del> <add> charging him with</add> felony committed in respect<lb/> of such goods.  By the Stolen-Metal Acts <add> [+]</add> <note>[+] 29.G.2.c.30. §.2; and 22.G.3.c.58.§.2</note> this<lb/> condition is dispensed with in the instance of goods<lb/> of that particular description; but if the dispensation<lb/> is proper in the instance of that particular class of <lb/> goods, it can hardly be otherwise than proper in the <lb/> instance of any other class of goods.  The clause <lb/> to this purpose, though thus general in respect to <lb/> <hi rend="underline"> persons</hi>, yet appeared to have so intimate a connection<lb/> with the system which <add> it</add> is the <del>particular</del> object<lb/> of <del> the Bill</del> <add> the present Bill to institute</add>, and in particular with the <add> matter of the </add> last <lb/> preceding clause, that (in conformity to the Instructions)<lb/> <del>it</del> <add>I</add> have <del>been</del> inserted it without scruple.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 16:22, 11 May 2015

Click Here To Edit

+Cd 3 114
Police Revenue Bill Observations

V. Penalties
§. 34
86

Precedents of
powers for searching
the House,
without charge
against any
particular person

§. 34 [1] [86] Page 67.0 [..Goods stolen...warrant...to make search] [Search] In general, search can not be made
by warrant for stolen goods, unless there be a charge deposition upon oath, against
a pe particular person, of charging him with felony committed in respect
of such goods. By the Stolen-Metal Acts [+] [+] 29.G.2.c.30. §.2; and 22.G.3.c.58.§.2 this
condition is dispensed with in the instance of goods
of that particular description; but if the dispensation
is proper in the instance of that particular class of
goods, it can hardly be otherwise than proper in the
instance of any other class of goods. The clause
to this purpose, though thus general in respect to
persons, yet appeared to have so intimate a connection
with the system which it is the particular object
of the Bill the present Bill to institute, and in particular with the matter of the last
preceding clause, that (in conformity to the Instructions)
it I have been inserted it without scruple.



Identifier: | JB/150/538/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

86

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

538

Info in main headings field

police revenue bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / f114

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50759

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in