★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
< | <head>9</head> | ||
<note>Inserenda 209 <lb/>Observations <lb/>VI. Miscellaneous <lb/>s. 52 <lb/>Exemption from Postage<lb/>111</note> | |||
seems to be lest, in that event, under the spur<del>s</del> of <lb/>the irritation produced by the view <del>of</del> or suspicion <lb/>of the abuse measures <del>may</del> <add>should</add> be taken <del>of such a</del> <add>such as</add> <lb/><add>may prove prejudicial to the use.</add><lb/> | |||
<del>nothing the effect of which may be to narrow and <lb/><add>impede</add> <gap/> the use. Our plain and simple <add>idea</add> proposition <lb/>is the proposition <add>idea</add> which the purpose <lb/>requires to be promulgated and received: viz: <lb/>that all correspondence <add>information</add> whatever and tending to <lb/>the furtherance of penal justice and especially <lb/>to the prevention of offenses will be received and <lb/><gap/> without expense to the informant</del><lb/>Personal interest being so much more sharp-sighted <lb/>than official duty, it might then happen, that <lb/><del>while under the nature of curbing the abuse the <lb/>use is <gap/>, the abuse may continue with <lb/>little vexation, leaving the <add>while the purpose of the restriction</add> restriction to bear <lb/><add>be</add> principally upon the use.</del> <lb/>the use might bear the burthen of the retrenchment, <lb/>while the abuse continued much the same. <lb/><p>Upon the whole, therefore, for the <del>sake of the</del> <lb/>good of the particular branch of service, as well as <lb/>for the sake of economy, and still more for the <lb/><del>sake</del> appearance of it, not to mention the circuity <lb/>of paying money out of one hand of <lb/>government into another, the franking plan, <lb/>guarded by the proposed restrictions, seems to be <lb/>the most eligible.<lb/></p><pb/> | |||
9
Inserenda 209
Observations
VI. Miscellaneous
s. 52
Exemption from Postage
111
seems to be lest, in that event, under the spurs of
the irritation produced by the view of or suspicion
of the abuse measures may should be taken of such a such as
may prove prejudicial to the use.
nothing the effect of which may be to narrow and
impede the use. Our plain and simple idea proposition
is the proposition idea which the purpose
requires to be promulgated and received: viz:
that all correspondence information whatever and tending to
the furtherance of penal justice and especially
to the prevention of offenses will be received and
without expense to the informant
Personal interest being so much more sharp-sighted
than official duty, it might then happen, that
while under the nature of curbing the abuse the
use is , the abuse may continue with
little vexation, leaving the while the purpose of the restriction restriction to bear
be principally upon the use.
the use might bear the burthen of the retrenchment,
while the abuse continued much the same.
Upon the whole, therefore, for the sake of the
good of the particular branch of service, as well as
for the sake of economy, and still more for the
sake appearance of it, not to mention the circuity
of paying money out of one hand of
government into another, the franking plan,
guarded by the proposed restrictions, seems to be
the most eligible.
---page break---
Identifier: | JB/150/638/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
150 |
police bill |
||
638 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d9 / f209 |
||
jeremy bentham |
g & ep 1794 |
||
fr3 |
|||
1794 |
|||
50859 |
|||