JB/150/638/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/638/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<note>9 Inserenda Observations VI. Miscellaneous s. 52 Exemption from Possess 111</note>
<head>9</head>


seems to be lest in that event under the ... of irritation produced by the view of or suspicion of the above measures may should be taken of such a such a may prove prejeducial to
<note>Inserenda 209 <lb/>Observations <lb/>VI. Miscellaneous <lb/>s. 52 <lb/>Exemption from Postage<lb/>111</note>


nothing the effect of which may be to narrow impeend .  the use Our plan and simple idea propositin is proposition idea which the purpose requires to be promulgated and received: viz: that all correspondence information  whatever and tending to the furtherance of penal justice and especially to the prevention of offenses will be receuved and ... without expense to the informant
seems to be lest, in that event, under the spur<del>s</del> of <lb/>the irritation produced by the view <del>of</del> or suspicion <lb/>of the abuse measures <del>may</del> <add>should</add> be taken <del>of such a</del> <add>such as</add> <lb/><add>may prove prejudicial to the use.</add><lb/>


Person interest being so much sharp-sighted than official duty,  it might then happen, that which under the notion of curbing the abuse the ... is ... the abuse may continue with little variation, leaving the while the purpose of the restriction restriction to be be principally ... the use. the use might bear the burthen of the retrenchment, while the abuse continued much the same. Upon the whole, therefore for the action of the good of the particular branch of service, as well as for the sake of economy, and still more for the .. appearance of it, not to mention the circuity of paying money out of one hand of government into another, the franking plan, guarded by the proposed restrictions, seems to be the most eligible.
<del>nothing the effect of which may be to narrow and <lb/><add>impede</add> <gap/> the use. Our plain and simple <add>idea</add> proposition <lb/>is the proposition <add>idea</add> which the purpose <lb/>requires to be promulgated and received: viz: <lb/>that all correspondence <add>information</add>  whatever and tending to <lb/>the furtherance of penal justice and especially <lb/>to the prevention of offenses will be received and <lb/><gap/> without expense to the informant</del><lb/>Personal interest being so much more sharp-sighted <lb/>than official duty,  it might then happen, that <lb/><del>while under the nature of curbing the abuse the <lb/>use is <gap/>, the abuse may continue with <lb/>little vexation, leaving the <add>while the purpose of the restriction</add> restriction to bear <lb/><add>be</add> principally upon the use.</del> <lb/>the use might bear the burthen of the retrenchment, <lb/>while the abuse continued much the same. <lb/><p>Upon the whole, therefore, for the <del>sake of the</del> <lb/>good of the particular branch of service, as well as <lb/>for the sake of economy, and still more for the <lb/><del>sake</del> appearance of it, not to mention the circuity <lb/>of paying money out of one hand of <lb/>government into another, the franking plan, <lb/>guarded by the proposed restrictions, seems to be <lb/>the most eligible.<lb/></p><pb/>





Revision as of 01:45, 15 June 2015

Click Here To Edit

9

Inserenda 209
Observations
VI. Miscellaneous
s. 52
Exemption from Postage
111

seems to be lest, in that event, under the spurs of
the irritation produced by the view of or suspicion
of the abuse measures may should be taken of such a such as
may prove prejudicial to the use.

nothing the effect of which may be to narrow and
impede the use. Our plain and simple idea proposition
is the proposition idea which the purpose
requires to be promulgated and received: viz:
that all correspondence information whatever and tending to
the furtherance of penal justice and especially
to the prevention of offenses will be received and
without expense to the informant

Personal interest being so much more sharp-sighted
than official duty, it might then happen, that
while under the nature of curbing the abuse the
use is , the abuse may continue with
little vexation, leaving the while the purpose of the restriction restriction to bear
be principally upon the use.

the use might bear the burthen of the retrenchment,
while the abuse continued much the same.

Upon the whole, therefore, for the sake of the
good of the particular branch of service, as well as
for the sake of economy, and still more for the
sake appearance of it, not to mention the circuity
of paying money out of one hand of
government into another, the franking plan,
guarded by the proposed restrictions, seems to be
the most eligible.


---page break---




















Identifier: | JB/150/638/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

638

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d9 / f209

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

g & ep 1794

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

fr3

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

ID Number

50859

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in