★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
in the prospect of a surplus must evidently<lb/> | in the prospect of a surplus must evidently<lb/> | ||
be premature</p> | be premature</p> | ||
But here a fallacy will require to be guarded against.<lb/> | <p>But here a fallacy will require to be guarded against.<lb/> | ||
The <add>actual</add> expence of the Colony has been estimated<lb/> | The <add>actual</add> expence of the Colony has been estimated<lb/> | ||
at £137,000 a year, <add>issued in the Country. </add> But it is not the Colony's furnishing a surplus produce to the amount of £137,000<lb/> | at £137,000 a year, <add>issued in the Country. </add> But it is not the Colony's furnishing a surplus produce to the amount of £137,000<lb/> | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
produced the property property of individual. If levied<lb/> | produced the property property of individual. If levied<lb/> | ||
by a tax similar to the Colonial taxes on Sugar, say<lb/> | by a tax similar to the Colonial taxes on Sugar, say<lb/> | ||
9 in raised numbers, by a 5 per Cent tax, the quantity<lb/> | |||
of surplus produce that maust have been brought <add>into <add>[+]</add></add> <note>into existence for this purpose must have been -not £137,000 a year, but £2,740,000: and then would come the question how much more <add>per cent</add> capital employ'd in giving birth to this £2,740,000 a year in this distant colony <add>has</add> produced <del>when</del> being so employ'd. than it would have <del>been</del> produced had it been employ'd in Britain.</note></p><pb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
Click Here To Edit
Police Report 7
Expence of punishment N.S.Wales
which would have received an increase, and
that a increase proportioned to the numbers,population
so transported. If by any surplus of such
articles as it is capable of producing it were
capable of being made to provide payment for
such articlles as it is not capable of producing
it could come to the same thing as if it produced
the whole: But instead of any such
surplus though even then it would be requisite
that the value of such surplus articles
should be considerable enough in proportion
to its bulk to pay for the freight on of a voyage
of little if at all less length than double that of
an East India Voyage. But where aafter a
course of experiment carried on for twelve years
there still remains a deficiency, and no
determinate period hold out view by the
the end of which that deficiency was is expected
to be suppliedfilled up, all calculations grounded
in the prospect of a surplus must evidently
be premature
But here a fallacy will require to be guarded against.
The actual expence of the Colony has been estimated
at £137,000 a year, issued in the Country. But it is not the Colony's furnishing a surplus produce to the amount of £137,000
that will be an equivalent for that expence: the
surplus, to an equivalent must be the property of
composed either of the real annual produce of lands and ments
in the hands of government, all expences paid,
or of taxed based upon an adequate mass of the pro colonial
produced the property property of individual. If levied
by a tax similar to the Colonial taxes on Sugar, say
9 in raised numbers, by a 5 per Cent tax, the quantity
of surplus produce that maust have been brought into <add>[+]</add> into existence for this purpose must have been -not £137,000 a year, but £2,740,000: and then would come the question how much more per cent capital employ'd in giving birth to this £2,740,000 a year in this distant colony has produced when being so employ'd. than it would have been produced had it been employ'd in Britain.
---page break---
Identifier: | JB/150/357/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
150 |
panopticon versus new south wales; police bill |
||
357 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
b7 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
50578 |
|||