JB/150/491/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/491/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/150/491/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/150/491/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- pencil annotations --> <p> + 3 <note> Inserenda 67 </note> <lb/> Police Bill <note>Observations<lb/> II Board<lb/> Surveyors Account</note></p><p>he has no such property, <del>or not enough of it</del><lb/><del>for the purpose,</del> or has taken measures for<lb/><del>sending it off</del> <add>conveying it away</add> out of the reach of justice, imprisonment<lb/>alone and not distress will as naturally <lb/>be the mode employ'd in such a case:<lb/>but if, although he has some sizable property<lb/>he has not enough to cover the Debt, or has<lb/><del>conveyd away</del> taken measures for conveying <lb/>away so much of it that <del>t</del> what remains accessible <lb/>to justice is not sufficient to cover the<lb/>whole of the debt, it is then equally evident that<lb/>neither mode is adequate to the purpose without<lb/>the other.  It is <del>then</del> <add>in this case</add> as necessary to employ<lb/>both <del>modes</del> <add>processes</add> together, as <add>it is</add> in the two other<lb/>cases respectively to employ either: so often as<lb/>the law refuses  <del>them to be employd</del> <add>the faculty of <del>the</del> employing them </add> together, so <lb/>far it gives a licence to a <del>knave</del> <add>dishonest man</add> to triumph<lb/>in his dishonesty.  Under a clause to <del>this</del> <add>the</add>effect<lb/><add>proposed,</add> when the <del>Law</del> <add>Magistrate</add> has recovered for the public<lb/>so much of the <del>embezzler's property</del> <add><del>defaulter's</del></add> debt as<lb/>the accessible part of the defaulter's property<lb/>will produce, if <del>then</del> he has <del>more</del> other<lb/>property not susceptible of  being seized and<lb/>the <del>fear of longer</del> <add>aversion to a continuance of the</add> imprisonment is strong enough<lb/>to induce him to <del>pr rest</del> make restitution<lb/>of that remainder, <del>it shall</del> <add>the public</add> in that case will recover<lb/>it: if, having it in his power to make<lb/>restitution, he at first refuses it, he lies in <lb/><del>jail</del> prison till he comes to a better temper, <lb/>and whatever <add>may be the hardship</add> he suffers <del>in this</del> <add>during that</add> time, being no<lb/><add>more</add></p>
<head>Police Rule</head>
<note><gap/>Observations<lb/>II Board<lb/>Surveyors<gap/></note>
<p>he has no such property, <del>or not enough of it</del><lb/><del>for the purpose,</del> or has taken measures for<lb/><del>sending it off</del> <add>conveying it away</add> out of the reach of justice, imprisonment<lb/>alone and not distress will as naturally <lb/>be the mode employ'd in such a case:<lb/>but if, although he has some sizable property<lb/>he has not enough to cover the Debt, or has<lb/><del>conveyd away</del> taken measures for conveying <lb/>away so much of it that <del>t</del> what remains accessible <lb/>to justice is not sufficient to cover the<lb/>whole of the debt, it is then equally evident that<lb/>neither mode is adequate to the purpose without<lb/>the other.  It is <del>then</del> <add>in this case</add> as necessary to employ<lb/>both <del>modes</del> <add>processes</add> together, as <add>it is</add> in the two other<lb/>cases respectively to employ either: so often as<lb/>the law refuses  <del>them to be employd</del> <add>the faculty of <del>the</del> employing them  
</add> together, so <lb/>far it gives a licence to a <del>knave</del> <add>dishonest man</add> to triumph<lb/>in his dishonesty.  Under a clause to <del>this</del> <add>the</add>
effect<lb/><add>proposed,</add> when the <del>Law</del> <add>Magistrate</add> has recovered for the public<lb/>so much of the <del>embezzler's property</del> <add><del>defaulter's</del></add> debt as<lb/>the accessible part of the defaulter's property<lb/>will produce, if <del>then</del> he has <del>more</del> other<lb/>property not susceptible of  being seized and<lb/>the <del>fear of longer</del> <add>aversion to a continuance of the</add> imprisonment is strong enough<lb/>to induce him to <del>pr rest</del> make restitution<lb/>of that remainder, <del>it shall</del> <add>the public</add> in that case will recover<lb/>it: if, leaving it in his power to make<lb/>restitution, he at first refuses it, he lies in <lb/><del>jail</del> prison till he comes to a better temper, <lb/>and whatever <add>may be the hardship</add> he suffers <del>in this</del> <add>during that</add> time, being no</p> <note>more</note>





Revision as of 14:52, 13 July 2015

Click Here To Edit

+ 3 Inserenda 67
Police Bill Observations
II Board
Surveyors Account

he has no such property, or not enough of it
for the purpose, or has taken measures for
sending it off conveying it away out of the reach of justice, imprisonment
alone and not distress will as naturally
be the mode employ'd in such a case:
but if, although he has some sizable property
he has not enough to cover the Debt, or has
conveyd away taken measures for conveying
away so much of it that t what remains accessible
to justice is not sufficient to cover the
whole of the debt, it is then equally evident that
neither mode is adequate to the purpose without
the other. It is then in this case as necessary to employ
both modes processes together, as it is in the two other
cases respectively to employ either: so often as
the law refuses them to be employd the faculty of the employing them together, so
far it gives a licence to a knave dishonest man to triumph
in his dishonesty. Under a clause to this theeffect
proposed, when the Law Magistrate has recovered for the public
so much of the embezzler's property defaulter's debt as
the accessible part of the defaulter's property
will produce, if then he has more other
property not susceptible of being seized and
the fear of longer aversion to a continuance of the imprisonment is strong enough
to induce him to pr rest make restitution
of that remainder, it shall the public in that case will recover
it: if, having it in his power to make
restitution, he at first refuses it, he lies in
jail prison till he comes to a better temper,
and whatever may be the hardship he suffers in this during that time, being no
more

















Identifier: | JB/150/491/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

491

Info in main headings field

police bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / f67

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50712

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in