JB/150/458/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/150/458/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/150/458/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/150/458/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- pencil annotations --> <p> 2 + C<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <note>30</note><lb/> <note>Observations</note> Police Revenue Bill<lb/> <note> 1. Licentiandi</note> </p> <p> <note> 18<lb/> <del>Class of</del> Affected <lb/> Pledge-Sellers<lb/> inserted for the <lb/> sake of including<lb/> Pawnbrokers &#x2014;why &#x2014;</note> </p> <p><note> §2</note>[2][<hi rend="underline">Pawnbroker</hi>] p.<add>19.</add> <del>The object of the clause including in</del><add><del>which includes</del></add><lb/><del>the list the of persons licenced the class of Forfeited</del><lb/>It is for the sake of bringing <hi rend="underline">Pawnbrokers</hi> under the <sic>controul</sic><lb/>of <add>the</add> discretionary licence system that the class of<lb/><hi rend="underline"> Forfeited-Pledge-Sellers</hi> is put upon the list: and by<lb/>this expedient <hi rend="underline">Pawnbrokers</hi> in general are in effect <lb/>included, though <del>not by that</del> under a different<lb/>name.  By <add>a clause in</add> the Statute of 29 G.3.c.57.§.12, <del>goo</del> <lb/><add><del>and by that</del> adopted in that of the 36 G.3.c.87.§.14,</add> articles pawned for <del>more than</del> any sum above ten <lb/>shillings and not exceeding £10, are to be sold by<lb/>Auction: articles <add>pawned for any sum</add> not above 10<add>s</add>, must therefore be<lb/>sold by <hi rend="underline">hand</hi>, or the business so far as concerns<lb/>articles not exceeding that value can not be carried<lb/>on, since a man who <add>should </add> <gap/> money on such goods<lb/>would have no means of recovering it. <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> There is not any class<lb/> of purchasers of second-hand<lb/> goods in the instance<lb/> of which the<lb/> demand for the <sic>controul</sic><lb/> established by this System<lb/> is stronger than<add>in</add> that<lb/> of Pawnbrokers: no<lb/> species of shop which<lb/> affords <del>no more</del><add>so</add> conspicuous<lb/> and general a<lb/> market for <del>stolen</del> goods<lb/> of all sorts, however<lb/> obtained.</note> It were<lb/>to be wished the direct way of including this class<lb/>of dealers could be substituted to this indirect one:[+]2 <lb/> <note><add>[+]2</add> But this could not<lb/> be effected, without<lb/> <sic>overhawling</sic> the System<lb/> of regulation established<lb/> in the case of Pawnbrokers:<lb/> an operation<lb/> <del>which</del> <add>that</add> would require<lb/> a separate Bill, which<lb/> should confine itself<lb/> to that particular occupation.</note><lb/>
 
 
<!-- pencil annotations -->  
 
<p> 2 + C<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <note>30</note><lb/> <note>Observations</note> Police Revenue Bill<lb/> <note> 1. Licentiandi</note> </p>  
 
<p> <note> 18<lb/> <del>Class of</del> Affected <lb/> Pledge-Sellers<lb/> inserted for the <lb/> sake of including<lb/> Pawnbrokers &#x2014;why &#x2014;</note> </p>  
 
<p><note> §2</note>[2][<hi rend="underline">Pawnbroker</hi>] p.<add>19.</add> <del>The object of the clause including in</del><add><del>which includes</del></add><lb/><del>the list the of persons licenced the class of Forfeited</del><lb/>It is for the sake of bringing <hi rend="underline">Pawnbrokers</hi> under the <sic>controul</sic><lb/>of <add>the</add> discretionary licence system that the class of<lb/><hi rend="underline"> Forfeited-Pledge-Sellers</hi> is put upon the list: and by<lb/>this expedient <hi rend="underline">Pawnbrokers</hi> in general are in effect <lb/>included, though <del>not by that</del> under a different<lb/>name.  By <add>a clause in</add> the Statute of 29 G.3.c.57.§.12, <del>goo</del> <lb/><add><del>and by that</del> adopted in that of the 36 G.3.c.87.§.14,</add> articles pawned for <del>more than</del> any sum above ten <lb/>shillings and not exceeding £10, are to be sold by<lb/>Auction: articles <add>pawned for any sum</add> not above 10<add>s</add>, must therefore be<lb/>sold by <hi rend="underline">hand</hi>, or the business so far as concerns<lb/>articles not exceeding that value can not be carried<lb/>on, since a man who <add>should </add> <gap/> money on such goods<lb/>would have no means of recovering it. <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> There is not any class<lb/> of purchasers of second-hand<lb/> goods in the instance<lb/> of which the<lb/> demand for the <sic>controul</sic><lb/> established by this System<lb/> is stronger than<add>in</add> that<lb/> of Pawnbrokers: no<lb/> species of shop which<lb/> affords <del>no more</del><add>so</add> conspicuous<lb/> and general a<lb/> market for <del>stolen</del> goods<lb/> of all sorts, however<lb/> obtained.</note> It were<lb/>to be wished the direct way of including this class<lb/>of dealers could be substituted to this indirect one:[+]2 <lb/> <note><add>[+]2</add> But this could not<lb/> be effected, without<lb/> <sic>overhawling</sic> the System<lb/> of regulation established<lb/> in the case of Pawnbrokers:<lb/> an operation<lb/> <del>which</del> <add>that</add> would require<lb/> a separate Bill, which<lb/> should confine itself<lb/> to that particular occupation.</note><lb/>
<del> and then, not only on <add>the score of</add> account of the complication<lb/>and <sic>embarassment</sic>, but because it seems such altogether<lb/>improbable, that under the discrete way, because<lb/>system <gap/><add><gap/></add> under other application thus made of it <gap/><lb/> Pawnbrokers, a class of Pawnbrokers may start <gap/><lb/> <gap/> have to show for a <gap/> of the licensing <lb/>system, may refuse to lend any less sum than <lb/>10 <hi rend="superscript">s</hi>.<add>+</add> </del><note> + Prevented by the existing Act : per <sic>Colq</sic>.</note> <del> But this, as already observed is among the <lb/>tasks which it seems necessary to <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> </del> <lb/>[3] Page.* 15.§.2 [Seller of forfeited Pledges<lb/> <del> <gap/> Bill</del> </p><p><del>[4] <gap/> </del> <add><del>[<hi rend="underline">Forfeited Pledge Seller</hi>.] p.19</del></add> Under the 32 G.2.c.24.§.4.a Pawnbroker, can<lb/>not sell <add>such of</add> his pledges <del>if they consist in</del><add> <del>such</del> as consist of </add> plate, without taking<lb/>out a Plate-sellers licence, Duty £5.</p> <!-- pencil annotation --><p> <note> 19 <lb/> Reference to the <lb/> <gap/> by which <lb/> Pawnbrokers are<lb/> subjected to the<lb/> Plate Dealers Licence duty</note> </p>
<del> and then, not only on <add>the score of</add> account of the complication<lb/>and <sic>embarassment</sic>, but because it seems such altogether<lb/>improbable, that under the discrete way, because<lb/>system <gap/><add><gap/></add> under other application thus made of it <gap/><lb/> Pawnbrokers, a class of Pawnbrokers may start <gap/><lb/> <gap/> have to show for a <gap/> of the licensing <lb/>system, may refuse to lend any less sum than <lb/>10 <hi rend="superscript">s</hi>.<add>+</add> </del><note> + Prevented by the existing Act : per <sic>Colq</sic>.</note> <del> But this, as already observed is among the <lb/>tasks which it seems necessary to <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> </del> <lb/>[3] Page.* 15.§.2 [Seller of forfeited Pledges<lb/> <del> <gap/> Bill</del> </p><p><del>[4] <gap/> </del> <add><del>[<hi rend="underline">Forfeited Pledge Seller</hi>.] p.19</del></add> Under the 32 G.2.c.24.§.4.a Pawnbroker, can<lb/>not sell <add>such of</add> his pledges <del>if they consist in</del><add> <del>such</del> as consist of </add> plate, without taking<lb/>out a Plate-sellers licence, Duty £5.</p> <!-- pencil annotation --><p> <note> 19 <lb/> Reference to the <lb/> <gap/> by which <lb/> Pawnbrokers are<lb/> subjected to the<lb/> Plate Dealers Licence duty</note> </p>



Revision as of 15:54, 20 July 2015

Click Here To Edit


2 + Cd 30
Observations Police Revenue Bill
1. Licentiandi

18
Class of Affected
Pledge-Sellers
inserted for the
sake of including
Pawnbrokers —why —

§2[2][Pawnbroker] p.19. The object of the clause including inwhich includes
the list the of persons licenced the class of Forfeited
It is for the sake of bringing Pawnbrokers under the controul
of the discretionary licence system that the class of
Forfeited-Pledge-Sellers is put upon the list: and by
this expedient Pawnbrokers in general are in effect
included, though not by that under a different
name. By a clause in the Statute of 29 G.3.c.57.§.12, goo
and by that adopted in that of the 36 G.3.c.87.§.14, articles pawned for more than any sum above ten
shillings and not exceeding £10, are to be sold by
Auction: articles pawned for any sum not above 10s, must therefore be
sold by hand, or the business so far as concerns
articles not exceeding that value can not be carried
on, since a man who should money on such goods
would have no means of recovering it. [+] [+] There is not any class
of purchasers of second-hand
goods in the instance
of which the
demand for the controul
established by this System
is stronger thanin that
of Pawnbrokers: no
species of shop which
affords no moreso conspicuous
and general a
market for stolen goods
of all sorts, however
obtained.
It were
to be wished the direct way of including this class
of dealers could be substituted to this indirect one:[+]2
[+]2 But this could not
be effected, without
overhawling the System
of regulation established
in the case of Pawnbrokers:
an operation
which that would require
a separate Bill, which
should confine itself
to that particular occupation.

and then, not only on the score of account of the complication
and embarassment, but because it seems such altogether
improbable, that under the discrete way, because
system under other application thus made of it
Pawnbrokers, a class of Pawnbrokers may start
have to show for a of the licensing
system, may refuse to lend any less sum than
10 s.+
+ Prevented by the existing Act : per Colq. But this, as already observed is among the
tasks which it seems necessary to

[3] Page.* 15.§.2 [Seller of forfeited Pledges
Bill

[4] [Forfeited Pledge Seller.] p.19 Under the 32 G.2.c.24.§.4.a Pawnbroker, can
not sell such of his pledges if they consist in such as consist of plate, without taking
out a Plate-sellers licence, Duty £5.

19
Reference to the
by which
Pawnbrokers are
subjected to the
Plate Dealers Licence duty



Identifier: | JB/150/458/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

18-19

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

458

Info in main headings field

police revenue bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b2 / f30

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50679

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in