JB/541/593/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/541/593/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<note>593</note>
<note>593</note>


<p>A Jury would settle all this in the regular way, and<lb/>ease every body of all responsibility and all trouble.<lb/>But if such should be the pleasure of them on whom<lb/>the choice depends, I had <add>infinitely</add> rather have the land estimated<lb/>at what to me appears an exaggerated <gap/> and make<lb/>an allowance according to such estimate, than be sent<lb/>at this late period in quest of land equally proper<lb/>and convenient for <del>both parties</del> <add>all purposes</add> which <del>after</del> <add>by</add> a long<lb/>and most diligent research I am satisfied is not to be<lb/>found.  With a map in my hand I could follow<lb/>the whole course of the river and point out the reasons<lb/>which put a negative upon this <add>and</add> that, and so upon<lb/>every other place.  I would do so, if so ordered; but<lb/><del>had I done so without</del> <add>to have done so without orders</add> would have employd a<lb/>quantity of paper <del>too</del> <add>so</add> great <del>to have any chance</del> <add>as to destroy all hope</add> of its<lb/>being read.  Difficult as it is to prove a negative <add>of this sort,</add> it<lb/>must be <del>equally</del> <add>proportionably</add> troublesome to <del>hear</del> <add>follow</add> the proof of it.<lb/></p>Understanding, <add>too,</add> that your <del>mem</del> recollection<lb/>wants some refreshment with regard to the reasons<lb/>for adhering to the existing choice I take the liberty of<lb/>inclosing a printed paper <del>which I</del> as being<lb/>less troublesome to read than a written extract from<lb/>the <del>too long</del> <add>discarded</add> Memorial.  Should it <add>in point of form</add> be deemed necessary<lb/>(which I <del>hope will</del> <add>should hope would</add> not be the case) to give in any <lb/><add><del>any addition</del></add><lb/>further reasons by way of supplement to the Memorial<lb/>actually given in, I know not how <del>to</del> <add>I could</add> avoid<lb/>troubling you, Sir, for an intimation (though the<lb/>briefest possible would be sufficient) of the points to<lb/>which <del>such for</del> it were your pleasure that such <del>further</del><lb/>reasons <add>additions</add> should apply.  Should it be deemed proper for  <add>in point of</add> forms<lb/>sake to give in any <lb/>part of the contents by way of supplement<lb/>to the Memorial already given in, a stroke of the pen <add>the</add> opposite<lb/>
<p>A Jury would settle all this in the regular way, and<lb/>ease every body of all responsibility and all trouble.<lb/>But if such should be the pleasure of them on whom<lb/>the choice depends, I had <add>infinitely</add> rather have the land estimated<lb/>at what to me appears an exaggerated sum and make<lb/>an allowance according to such estimate, than be sent<lb/>at this late period in quest of land equally proper<lb/>and convenient for <del>both parties</del> <add>all purposes</add> which <del>after</del> <add>by</add> a long<lb/>and most diligent research I am satisfied is not to be<lb/>found.  With a map in my hand I could follow<lb/>the whole course of the river and point out the reasons<lb/>which put a negative upon this <add>and</add> that, and so upon<lb/>every other place.  I would do so, if so ordered; but<lb/><del>had I done so without</del> <add>to have done so without orders</add> would have employd a<lb/>quantity of paper <del>too</del> <add>so</add> great <del>to have any chance</del> <add>as to destroy all hope</add> of its<lb/>being read.  Difficult as it is to prove a negative <add>of this sort,</add> it<lb/>must be <del>equally</del> <add>proportionably</add> troublesome to <del>hear</del> <add>follow</add> the proof of it.<lb/></p>Understanding, <add>Sir,</add> that your <del>mem</del> recollection<lb/>wants some refreshment with regard to the reasons<lb/>for adhering to the existing choice I take the liberty of<lb/>inclosing a printed paper <del>which I</del> as being<lb/>less troublesome to read than a written extract from<lb/>the <del>too long</del> <add>discarded</add> Memorial.  Should it <add>in point of form</add> be deemed necessary<lb/>(which I <del>hope will</del> <add>should hope would</add> not be the case) to give in any <lb/><add><del>any addition</del></add><lb/>further reasons by way of supplement to the Memorial<lb/>actually given in, I know not how <del>to</del> <add>I could</add> avoid<lb/>troubling you, Sir, for an intimation (though the<lb/>briefest possible would be sufficient) of the points to<lb/>which <del>such fu</del> it were your pleasure that such <del>further</del><lb/>reasons <add>additions</add> should apply.  Should it be deemed proper for  <add>in point of</add> form<lb/>sake to give in any <lb/>part of the contents by way of supplement<lb/>to the Memorial already given in, a stroke of the pen <add>the</add> opposite<lb/>




<note>It is with inexpressible <lb/>satisfaction <lb/>that I now understand <lb/>that there <add>either no</add><lb/><del>never have</del> <add>difficulties ever have</add> have or<lb/><add>existed or were</add> at least <del>was</del> exist<lb/>now but what concern<lb/>the <del>a</del> supposed <lb/>increase of <lb/>value on the part <lb/>of the land: and <lb/>in regard to this point,<lb/>the offer <del>contained</del> <add>subjoined</add> <lb/>to the inclosed paper <lb/><del>will of itself be</del> <add>will I flatter myself be</add> found<lb/><add>of itself</add> sufficient to supersede <lb/>the necessity of any <lb/>further elucidations.</note><lb/><pb/>
<note>It is with inexpressible <lb/>satisfaction <lb/>that I now understand <lb/>that there <add>either is</add><lb/><del>never have</del> <add>difficulties ever have</add> been or<lb/><add>existed or were</add> at least <del>was</del> exist<lb/>now but what concern<lb/>the <del>a</del> supposed <lb/>increase of <lb/>value on the part <lb/>of the land: and <lb/>in regard to this point,<lb/>the offer <del>contained</del> <add>subjoined</add> <lb/>to the inclosed paper <lb/><del>will of itself be</del> <add>will I flatter myself be</add> found<lb/><add>of itself</add> sufficient to supersede <lb/>the necessity of any <lb/>further elucidation.</note><lb/><pb/>





Revision as of 19:57, 21 July 2015

Click Here To Edit

593

A Jury would settle all this in the regular way, and
ease every body of all responsibility and all trouble.
But if such should be the pleasure of them on whom
the choice depends, I had infinitely rather have the land estimated
at what to me appears an exaggerated sum and make
an allowance according to such estimate, than be sent
at this late period in quest of land equally proper
and convenient for both parties all purposes which after by a long
and most diligent research I am satisfied is not to be
found. With a map in my hand I could follow
the whole course of the river and point out the reasons
which put a negative upon this and that, and so upon
every other place. I would do so, if so ordered; but
had I done so without to have done so without orders would have employd a
quantity of paper too so great to have any chance as to destroy all hope of its
being read. Difficult as it is to prove a negative of this sort, it
must be equally proportionably troublesome to hear follow the proof of it.

Understanding, Sir, that your mem recollection
wants some refreshment with regard to the reasons
for adhering to the existing choice I take the liberty of
inclosing a printed paper which I as being
less troublesome to read than a written extract from
the too long discarded Memorial. Should it in point of form be deemed necessary
(which I hope will should hope would not be the case) to give in any
any addition
further reasons by way of supplement to the Memorial
actually given in, I know not how to I could avoid
troubling you, Sir, for an intimation (though the
briefest possible would be sufficient) of the points to
which such fu it were your pleasure that such further
reasons additions should apply. Should it be deemed proper for in point of form
sake to give in any
part of the contents by way of supplement
to the Memorial already given in, a stroke of the pen the opposite


It is with inexpressible
satisfaction
that I now understand
that there either is
never have difficulties ever have been or
existed or were at least was exist
now but what concern
the a supposed
increase of
value on the part
of the land: and
in regard to this point,
the offer contained subjoined
to the inclosed paper
will of itself be will I flatter myself be found
of itself sufficient to supersede
the necessity of any
further elucidation.


---page break---


























Identifier: | JB/541/593/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541.

Date_1

1794-??-??

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

541

Main Headings

Folio number

593

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in