★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <head>To Dundas Answer</head> | ||
<note>94 - 9 - 26 <lb/>Sept. 25 1794 <lb/>Not sent <del>594</del><lb/>598</note> | |||
As to the length of my letter believe me for it<lb/>could not be more <gap/> to wear me as it was<lb/>to the reader it was beyond comparison more so to the <lb/>writer. I have it much to regret <add>it is matter of great regret to me, but</add> but very little to<lb/>accuse of very little of self-accusation. In conformity <lb/>to the engagement M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Lowndes's first instructions were<lb/>to visit the land in question and no other in the<lb/>Bill. M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Lowndes was sent for afterwords and directed to meet<lb/>the optical claim opening the door for any others.<lb/>Was any reason assigned to me for this? Not any<lb/>Was it to be ... a that I should take the <lb/>alarm at this? No surely — The length of my<lb/>plan, Sir, was in proportion to the strength of my<lb/>alarm. who then Sir was the original author<lb/>of my long letter? Myself? No Sir: but the<lb/>member of Administration who gave the new<lb/>direction to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Lowndes — Who was the <add>original</add> author<lb/>of the improprieties of my stile? Myself Sir?<lb/>No Sir but the same Ministers <del>from</del> <gap/> so acutely<lb/>sensible <del>of</del> <add>to</add> improprieties of stile. Be assured, Sir<lb/>had the inter engagements <gap/> upon and<lb/>conformed by the interval <add>a negotiation <add>fraud</add> <add>of even matters</add> been adhered to<lb/>had the instructions first given to me and then to <lb/>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Lowndes been adhered to, obsequeousness and<lb/>gratitude would have been the only sentiments <add>the business <del>could</del></add> your<lb/>would have ever <del><gap/></del> drawn from me . Is <del>my</del> obsequeoulsness<lb/>on my part <add>in</add> credible? — <del>Sir</del> Order me Sir<lb/>and I will give you at least half a dozen instances<lb/>of it and those no trivial ones.<lb/><pb/> | |||
To Dundas Answer
94 - 9 - 26
Sept. 25 1794
Not sent 594
598
As to the length of my letter believe me for it
could not be more to wear me as it was
to the reader it was beyond comparison more so to the
writer. I have it much to regret it is matter of great regret to me, but but very little to
accuse of very little of self-accusation. In conformity
to the engagement Mr Lowndes's first instructions were
to visit the land in question and no other in the
Bill. Mr Lowndes was sent for afterwords and directed to meet
the optical claim opening the door for any others.
Was any reason assigned to me for this? Not any
Was it to be ... a that I should take the
alarm at this? No surely — The length of my
plan, Sir, was in proportion to the strength of my
alarm. who then Sir was the original author
of my long letter? Myself? No Sir: but the
member of Administration who gave the new
direction to Mr Lowndes — Who was the original author
of the improprieties of my stile? Myself Sir?
No Sir but the same Ministers from so acutely
sensible of to improprieties of stile. Be assured, Sir
had the inter engagements upon and
conformed by the interval a negotiation <add>fraud of even matters been adhered to
had the instructions first given to me and then to
Mr Lowndes been adhered to, obsequeousness and
gratitude would have been the only sentiments the business could your
would have ever drawn from me . Is my obsequeoulsness
on my part in credible? — Sir Order me Sir
and I will give you at least half a dozen instances
of it and those no trivial ones.
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/541/598/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1794-09-25 |
|||
|
541 |
|||
|
598 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
Correspondence |
|||
|
Jeremy Bentham |
|||
