JB/541/598/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/541/598/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


<p>As to the length of my letter believe me Sir it<lb/>could not be more irksome to <del>wearis</del>  
<p>As to the length of my letter believe me Sir it<lb/>could not be more irksome to <del>wearis</del>  
me as it was<lb/>to the reader it was beyond comparison more so to the <lb/>writer.  I have it much to regret but <add>it is matter of great regret to me, but</add>  very little to<lb/>accuse of very little of self-accusation.  In conformity <lb/>to the engagement M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Lowndes's first instructions were<lb/>to insert the land in question and no other in the<lb/>Bill.  M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Lowndes was <add>afterwards</add> sent for  and directed to insert<lb/>the optional clause opening the door for any others.<lb/>Was any reason assigned to me for this?  Not any<lb/>Was it to be wondered at that I should take the <lb/>alarm at this?  No surely &#x2014; The length of my<lb/>plea, Sir, was in proportion to the strength of my<lb/>alarm. .  Who then Sir was the original author<lb/>of my long letter?  Myself?  No Sir: but the<lb/>member of Administration who gave the new<lb/>direction to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Lowndes &#x2014; Who was the <add>original</add> author<lb/>of the improprieties of my stile?  Myself Sir?<lb/>No Sir but the same illustrious <del>person</del> <add><gap/></add> so acutely<lb/>sensible <del>of</del> <add>to</add> improprieties of  stile.  Be assured, Sir<lb/>had the <del>inter</del> engagements proceeded upon and<lb/>confirmed by the interval <add>a negotiation <add>fraud</add> <add>of even matters</add> been adhered to<lb/>had the instructions first given to me and then to <lb/>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Lowndes been adhered to, obsequiousness and<lb/>gratitude would have been the only sentiments <add>the business <del>could</del></add> you<lb/>would have ever <del><gap/></del> drawn from me . Is <del>my</del> obsequiousness<lb/>on my part <add>in</add> credible? &#x2014; <del>Sir</del> Order me Sir<lb/>and I will give you at least half a dozen instances<lb/>of it and those no trivial ones.<lb/></p><pb/>
me as it was<lb/>to the reader it was beyond comparison more so to the <lb/>writer.  I have it much to regret but <add>it is matter of great regret to me, but</add>  very little to<lb/>accuse of very little of self-accusation.  In conformity <lb/>to the engagement M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Lowndes's first instructions were<lb/>to insert the land in question and no other in the<lb/>Bill.  M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Lowndes was <add>afterwards</add> sent for  and directed to insert<lb/>the optional clause opening the door for any other.<lb/>Was any reason assigned to me for this?  Not any<lb/>Was it to be wondered at that I should take the <lb/>alarm at this?  No surely &#x2014; The length of my<lb/>plea, Sir, was in proportion to the strength of my<lb/>alarm. .  Who then Sir was the original author<lb/>of my long letter?  Myself?  No Sir: but the<lb/>member of Administration who gave the new<lb/>direction to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Lowndes &#x2014; Who was the <add>original</add> author<lb/>of the improprieties of my stile?  Myself Sir?<lb/>No Sir but the same illustrious <del>person</del> <add>critic</add> so acutely<lb/>sensible <del>of</del> <add>to</add> improprieties of  stile.  Be assured, Sir<lb/>had the <del>ideas</del> engagements proceeded upon and<lb/>confirmed by the interval <add>a negotiation <add>period</add> <add>of <unclear>some</unclear> months</add> been adhered to<lb/>had the instructions first given to me and then to <lb/>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Lowndes been adhered to, obsequiousness and<lb/>gratitude would have been the only sentiments <add>the business <del>would</del></add> you<lb/>would have ever <del><gap/></del> drawn from me . Is <del>my</del> obsequiousness<lb/>on my part <add>in</add> credible? &#x2014; <del>Sir</del> Order me Sir<lb/>and I will give you at least half a dozen instances<lb/>of it and those no trivial ones.<lb/></p><pb/>





Revision as of 22:35, 31 July 2015

Click Here To Edit

To Dundas Answer

9 94 - 9 - 26
Sept. 25 1794
Not sent 594
598

As to the length of my letter believe me Sir it
could not be more irksome to wearis me as it was
to the reader it was beyond comparison more so to the
writer. I have it much to regret but it is matter of great regret to me, but very little to
accuse of very little of self-accusation. In conformity
to the engagement Mr Lowndes's first instructions were
to insert the land in question and no other in the
Bill. Mr Lowndes was afterwards sent for and directed to insert
the optional clause opening the door for any other.
Was any reason assigned to me for this? Not any
Was it to be wondered at that I should take the
alarm at this? No surely — The length of my
plea, Sir, was in proportion to the strength of my
alarm. . Who then Sir was the original author
of my long letter? Myself? No Sir: but the
member of Administration who gave the new
direction to Mr Lowndes — Who was the original author
of the improprieties of my stile? Myself Sir?
No Sir but the same illustrious person critic so acutely
sensible of to improprieties of stile. Be assured, Sir
had the ideas engagements proceeded upon and
confirmed by the interval a negotiation <add>period of some months been adhered to
had the instructions first given to me and then to
Mr Lowndes been adhered to, obsequiousness and
gratitude would have been the only sentiments the business would you
would have ever drawn from me . Is my obsequiousness
on my part in credible? — Sir Order me Sir
and I will give you at least half a dozen instances
of it and those no trivial ones.


---page break---

























Identifier: | JB/541/598/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541.

Date_1

1794-09-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

541

Main Headings

Folio number

598

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in