JB/050/010/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/010/001: Difference between revisions

RichardDavis (talk | contribs)
m 1 revision: Batch upload Box 50 - first attempt - fingers crossed
Lidunn (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''[{{fullurl:JB/0<unclear>5</unclear>0/010/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/010/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>PROCEDURE Summary.</head><lb/>
<p>One obvious reflection is, that if the Statutes of <lb/>
an ancient date, <note>such as perhaps for this purpose in a <gap/> <gap/> may be said to be the greatest <gap/>all that are <gap/> <gap/> to the <unclear> of <gap/>, or even to the <gap/>, though it must be acknowledged that some which are <gap/> are <gap/> in other respects, than some which are <gap/> to this <gap/>.</note><add>are fit to be <unclear>confirmed</unclear>, which establish a summary jurisdiction</add> naked in great measure or <lb/>
altogether of all <add>those</add> <gap/>adj..cation regulation by which <lb/>
the exercise of it should be governed, <del>are fit to be</del><lb/>
<del>continued,</del> these Legislators who at the expense <lb/>
of so much ingenuity have invented &amp; established <lb/>
these regulations have been egregiously <add><gap/></add><gap/> <lb/>
of their time. Not that the observation is <unclear>unapplicable</unclear> <lb/>
to any Statute which <gap/> any thing of <lb/>
being provided with a compleat <gap/> of them. <lb/>
that is, <del>perhaps</del> one may say, <add>perhaps</add> to any Statute <unclear>extant:</unclear> <lb/>
<del>but</del> <add>though</add> the truth of it is more <add>most</add> glaring <lb/>
when applied to such as I have described <add>been mentioning</add>.
</p>
<head>PROCEDURE SUMMARY<lb/></head>
<head>Imperfection of the Ancient.<lb/><pb/></head>





Revision as of 02:21, 14 February 2011

[{{fullurl:JB/050/010/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]

PROCEDURE Summary.

One obvious reflection is, that if the Statutes of
an ancient date, such as perhaps for this purpose in a may be said to be the greatest all that are to the <unclear> of , or even to the , though it must be acknowledged that some which are are in other respects, than some which are to this .are fit to be confirmed, which establish a summary jurisdiction naked in great measure or
altogether of all those adj..cation regulation by which
the exercise of it should be governed, are fit to be
continued, these Legislators who at the expense
of so much ingenuity have invented & established
these regulations have been egregiously
of their time. Not that the observation is unapplicable
to any Statute which any thing of
being provided with a compleat of them.
that is, perhaps one may say, perhaps to any Statute extant:
but though the truth of it is more most glaring
when applied to such as I have described been mentioning.

PROCEDURE SUMMARY
Imperfection of the Ancient.

---page break---




Identifier: | JB/050/010/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

010

Info in main headings field

procedure summary

Image

001

Titles

imperfection of the ancient

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in