JB/002/667/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/002/667/001: Difference between revisions

RichardDavis (talk | contribs)
m 1 revision: Importing all JB pages from Main Namespace on Testwiki
ValerieWallace (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
== ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE ==
== ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE ==


 
<p>2. A mode that might appear eligible in<lb/> a certain point of view in first sight, <del>is &#x2014;</del> <lb/> and as recommended in some degree by precedent, is &#x2014;<lb/> <gap/> <del><gap/></del> pitching upon <del>a <gap/> of</del> a certain<lb/> <del><gap/>, and <unclear>paying</unclear> is is an</del><lb/>
<gap/>, viz: that <gap/> of which <unclear><gap/></unclear> the amount<lb/> of the issue, in <add>whether</add> quantity or a number, were<lb/> the <unclear>last</unclear>, and paying off all notes of that <gap/>.<lb/> because <del><gap/></del> this <gap/> being least in demand<lb/> could best be spared. But this mode would be<lb/> open to several objections<lb/></p>
<p>1. The chances would be many to one against<lb/> every exact correspondence between the sum at<lb/> command for paying off, and the amount of<lb/> Annuity note paper which upon the <gap/><lb/> would be to be paid off.<lb/></p>
<p>2. With reference to the persons actually demanding<lb/> and purchasing it, this <del><gap/></del> <gap/><lb/> of which <gap/><del> <unclear>was</unclear></del> less <add>had been sold</add> would be as convenient<lb/> as every other <gap/> of which <del>the</del> a greater<lb/> quantity had been sold: so that the performance<lb/> would be attended with no advantage</p>
3.




== DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE ==
== DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE ==
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:59, 14 February 2011

File:JB 002 667 001.jpg

ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE

2. A mode that might appear eligible in
a certain point of view in first sight, is —
and as recommended in some degree by precedent, is —
pitching upon a of a certain
, and paying is is an
, viz: that of which the amount
of the issue, in whether quantity or a number, were
the last, and paying off all notes of that .
because this being least in demand
could best be spared. But this mode would be
open to several objections

1. The chances would be many to one against
every exact correspondence between the sum at
command for paying off, and the amount of
Annuity note paper which upon the
would be to be paid off.

2. With reference to the persons actually demanding
and purchasing it, this
of which was less had been sold would be as convenient
as every other of which the a greater
quantity had been sold: so that the performance
would be attended with no advantage

3.


DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE

Identifier: | JB/002/667/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

002

Main Headings

Annuity Notes

Folio number

667

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

E2

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

<…>M 1798

Marginals

Paper Producer

Frances Wright

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1798

Notes public

ID Number

1406

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in