★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1826. Feb<hi rend="superscript | <head>1826. Feb<hi rend="superscript">y..</hi> 28.</head><lb/> | ||
Constitutional Code.<lb/> | <head>Constitutional Code.</head><lb/> | ||
<note>.1828 Aug 24<lb/> | <note>.1828 Aug 24<lb/> | ||
12 1839. May 19.<lb/> | 12 1839. May 19.<lb/> | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
12 S.2.11. Legislation Minister<lb/> | 12 S.2.11. Legislation Minister<lb/> | ||
Rationale</note><lb/> | Rationale</note><lb/> | ||
<del><hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi></del> | <del><hi rend="underline">R<gap/>atives</hi></del> | ||
</head><lb/> | </head><lb/> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
Art | <p>Art 20 [<unclear>Dejected.</unclear> <add><gap/></add>] Reasons for the <del>rejection</del> <hi rend="superscript"><add>dropping</add></hi> of <note>Art Reasons for dropping<lb/> | ||
amendments in any other than | <del><gap/></del> note <unclear>symmetriated</unclear><lb/> | ||
form.< | amendments.<lb/> | ||
< | In Judges hands<lb/> | ||
1. In the case where the proposed amendment is<lb/> | this <gap/> is in the<lb/> | ||
most apt hands <del><gap/></del></note><lb/> | |||
amendments in any other than the proposed symmetrical<lb/> | |||
form.</p> | |||
<p>1. In the case where the proposed amendment is<lb/> | |||
the work of a Judge, by whom, as per Ch. XII. <hi rend="underline">Judiciary<lb/> | the work of a Judge, by whom, as per Ch. XII. <hi rend="underline">Judiciary<lb/> | ||
Collectively,</hi> S.20. <hi rend="underline">Eventually emendative function,</hi><lb/> | Collectively,</hi> S.20. <hi rend="underline">Eventually emendative function,</hi><lb/> | ||
| Line 27: | Line 31: | ||
of <unclear>clearness,</unclear> correctness, all comprehensiveness,<lb/> | of <unclear>clearness,</unclear> correctness, all comprehensiveness,<lb/> | ||
and conciseness; and, on the part of the legislature,<lb/> | and conciseness; and, on the part of the legislature,<lb/> | ||
much waste of time <add><hi rend="superscript">is</hi></add> saved.< | much <hi rend="underline">waste of time <add><hi rend="superscript">is</hi></add> saved.</hi></p> | ||
1826. Feby.. 28.
Constitutional Code.
.1828 Aug 24
12 1839. May 19.
Ch. XI. Ministers Severally.
12 S.2.11. Legislation Minister
Rationale
Ratives
</head>
Art 20 [Dejected. ] Reasons for the rejection dropping of Art Reasons for dropping
note symmetriated
amendments.
In Judges hands
this is in the
most apt hands
amendments in any other than the proposed symmetrical
form.
1. In the case where the proposed amendment is
the work of a Judge, by whom, as per Ch. XII. Judiciary
Collectively, S.20. Eventually emendative function,
indication of a supposed demand for amendment
has, in the exercise of such his functions been made,-
the task of giving expressions to the amendment, on the
supposition of it's being desireable, is placed in hands
best situated, for the giving to it the requisite properties
of clearness, correctness, all comprehensiveness,
and conciseness; and, on the part of the legislature,
much waste of time <add><hi rend="superscript">is</add> saved.</hi>
|
Identifier: | JB/042/019/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1826-02-28 |
|||
|
042 |
constitutional code |
||
|
019 |
constitutional code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d12 / e12 |
||
|
john flowerdew colls |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
"used" |
12942 |
||
