★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
1822 May 29<lb/><head>Economy etc.</head><lb/><note>Ch. VI. Legislative<lb/>§. Relocable, who</note><p>Ch <gap/>identified<lb/>Non-reeligibility<lb/>1.<lb/>1. Means of identification,<lb/>non-reeligibility<lb/>of Supreme operatives.<lb/>reason 1.<lb/>1. Subservience to<lb/>moral aptitude.<lb/>Subject, all his life long<lb/>Ruler say one year<lb/>only. Improbable,<lb/>that, for such short<lb/>lived power, <add>a</add> man<lb/>should barter perpetual<lb/>security.</p><p>2.<lb/>Objection 1. Insufficiency<lb/>In Assembly N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> 1. In<lb/>that one year may<lb/>be obtained by each<lb/>member, situations<lb/>unlimited in value<lb/>for his connections.<lb/>So in Assembly N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> 2.<lb/>Thus may be formed<lb/>an Aristocracy composed<lb/>of the members<lb/>of the several successive<lb/>assemblies.<lb/>Notwithstanding<lb/>exclusions, the particular<lb/>and sinister<lb/>interest will remain.<lb/>-----</p><p>3.<lb/>Objection 2. Inconsistency<lb/>with elector's<lb/>supposed aptitude.<lb/>By supposition they<lb/>are apt to choose a<lb/>representative<lb/>antecedently to their<lb/>experience of him:<lb/>much more after<lb/>such experience. <!-- The entire previous column has been stricken --></p><pb/> | 1822 May 29<lb/><head>Economy etc.</head><lb/><note>Ch. VI. Legislative<lb/>§. Relocable, who</note><p>Ch <gap/> identified<lb/>Non-reeligibility<lb/>1.<lb/>1. Means of identification,<lb/>non-reeligibility<lb/>of Supreme operatives.<lb/>reason 1.<lb/>1. Subservience to<lb/>moral aptitude.<lb/>Subject, all his life long<lb/>Ruler say one year<lb/>only. Improbable,<lb/>that, for such short<lb/>lived power, <add>a</add> man<lb/>should barter perpetual<lb/>security.</p><p>2.<lb/>Objection 1. Insufficiency<lb/>In Assembly N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> 1. In<lb/>that one year may<lb/>be obtained by each<lb/>member, situations<lb/>unlimited in value<lb/>for his connections.<lb/>So in Assembly N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> 2.<lb/>Thus may be formed<lb/>an Aristocracy composed<lb/>of the members<lb/>of the several successive<lb/>assemblies.<lb/>Notwithstanding<lb/>exclusions, the particular<lb/>and sinister<lb/>interest will remain.<lb/>-----</p><p>3.<lb/>Objection 2. Inconsistency<lb/>with elector's<lb/>supposed aptitude.<lb/>By supposition they<lb/>are apt to choose a<lb/>representative<lb/>antecedently to their<lb/>experience of him:<lb/>much more after<lb/>such experience. <!-- The entire previous column has been stricken --></p><pb/>3 contin<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi><lb/>In Assembly N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> 1,<lb/>suppose sinister influence<lb/>of aristocratical<lb/>interest observed in a<lb/>member: to Assembly<lb/>N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> 2 he will not be<lb/>returned.<p>Evidence not sufficient<lb/>for punishment<lb/>may be quite sufficient<lb/>for non-reelection.<lb/>-----</p><p>4.<lb/>Objection 3. Detriment<lb/>to intellectual aptitude.<lb/>The younger the state,<lb/>the greater the demand<lb/>for appropriate<lb/>experience and the scantier<lb/>the supply.<lb/>Thus <add>to</add> narrow the<lb/>supply, can it fail<lb/>to be detrimental?</p><p>5.<lb/>Answer 1. Objection 3<lb/>1. Utility of intellectual<lb/>aptitude — thence its<lb/>contributoriness to aggregate<lb/>aptitude, depends<lb/>upon moral aptitude.<lb/>Suppose disposition<lb/>towards the sinister<lb/>sacrifice, the greater the<lb/>intellectual aptitude, the<lb/>more likely will such<lb/>disposition be to be<lb/>productive of corresponding<lb/>acts & effects.<!-- Paragraphs 4 and 5 above have been stricken. --></p> | ||
1822 May 29
Economy etc.
Ch. VI. Legislative
§. Relocable, who
Ch identified
Non-reeligibility
1.
1. Means of identification,
non-reeligibility
of Supreme operatives.
reason 1.
1. Subservience to
moral aptitude.
Subject, all his life long
Ruler say one year
only. Improbable,
that, for such short
lived power, a man
should barter perpetual
security.
2.
Objection 1. Insufficiency
In Assembly No. 1. In
that one year may
be obtained by each
member, situations
unlimited in value
for his connections.
So in Assembly No. 2.
Thus may be formed
an Aristocracy composed
of the members
of the several successive
assemblies.
Notwithstanding
exclusions, the particular
and sinister
interest will remain.
-----
3.
Objection 2. Inconsistency
with elector's
supposed aptitude.
By supposition they
are apt to choose a
representative
antecedently to their
experience of him:
much more after
such experience.
---page break---
3 contind.
In Assembly No. 1,
suppose sinister influence
of aristocratical
interest observed in a
member: to Assembly
No. 2 he will not be
returned.
Evidence not sufficient
for punishment
may be quite sufficient
for non-reelection.
-----
4.
Objection 3. Detriment
to intellectual aptitude.
The younger the state,
the greater the demand
for appropriate
experience and the scantier
the supply.
Thus to narrow the
supply, can it fail
to be detrimental?
5.
Answer 1. Objection 3
1. Utility of intellectual
aptitude — thence its
contributoriness to aggregate
aptitude, depends
upon moral aptitude.
Suppose disposition
towards the sinister
sacrifice, the greater the
intellectual aptitude, the
more likely will such
disposition be to be
productive of corresponding
acts & effects.
|
Identifier: | JB/038/281/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 38. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1822-05-29 |
1-11 |
||
|
038 |
economy as to office |
||
|
281a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 281. |
economy &c |
||
|
001 |
ch. securities for i moral aptitude / interests identified / nonreeligibility |
||
|
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e2 |
||
|
john flowerdew colls |
[[watermarks::i&m [prince of wales feathers] 1818]] |
||
|
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
|
1818 |
|||
|
11918 |
|||
