JB/073/093/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/073/093/001: Difference between revisions

Johnscott (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Johnscott (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>NONCON. Crit. Review</head>
<head>NONCON. Crit. Review</head>
argumenting in their defense supposing<lb/><gap/>to produce an argument which <lb/>for a moment might appear specious<lb/><gap/>I in order to oppose it,<del><gap/><add>added text</add></del><add>bother</add><lb/><gap/><add>myself to</add><unclear>intrestive</unclear> and exclamation?<lb/> nothing could be more important or more<lb/>  
argumenting in their defense supposing<lb/><gap/>to produce an argument which <lb/>for a moment might appear specious<lb/><gap/>I in order to oppose it,<del><gap/><add>added text</add></del><add>bother</add><lb/><gap/><add>myself to</add><unclear>intrestive</unclear> and exclamation?<lb/> nothing could be more important or more<lb/>imprudent<add>in proportionas it<<lb/>was<gap/>, it would<lb/>appear, that I was<lb/>flying from the con-<lb/>test: while standing<lb/><unclear>firm</unclear>on the ground of<lb/><unclear>reason</unclear>, the simple<gap/>I(I mightindeed with <lb/>justice show my  <unclear>anger</unclear><lb/>if <gap/><add>casting</add>off the habit<lb/>of a reasoner, he were<lb/>to <gap/>himself to/add><lb/> the simple <gap/><add>suggestion</add>of a<lb/>
 
few manifest <gap/>over<lb/>through his argument into the
 
<gap/><lb/>for it would be always easy to show, a<lb/>
<gap/>cautious<add>speculations</add>what<lb/>to the contrary,that the infallible<lb/>tendancy of both these<gap/><add><gap/></add><unclear></unclear><lb/>to the degree they would, without the <add>law's coercion</add><lb/>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 22:09, 15 February 2011

Click Here To Edit

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet NONCON. Crit. Review argumenting in their defense supposing
to produce an argument which
for a moment might appear specious
I in order to oppose it,added textbother
myself tointrestive and exclamation?
nothing could be more important or more
imprudentin proportionas it<
was, it would
appear, that I was
flying from the con-
test: while standing
firmon the ground of
reason, the simpleI(I mightindeed with
justice show my anger
if <add>casting
off the habit
of a reasoner, he were
to himself to/add>
the simple suggestionof a
few manifest over
through his argument into the
for it would be always easy to show, a
cautiousspeculationswhat
to the contrary,that the infallible
tendancy of both these
to the degree they would, without the law's coercion


Identifier: | JB/073/093/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

073

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

093

Info in main headings field

noncon. crit. review

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial lion motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23933

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in