JB/002/015/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/015/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:
as <unclear>professed</unclear> of a <add>by far</add> &#x2014; <del>much</del> more rapid degree of efficacy, than
as <unclear>professed</unclear> of a <add>by far</add> &#x2014; <del>much</del> more rapid degree of efficacy, than
<lb/>
<lb/>
I have seen any where <del>ascribed</del> <add>attributed</add> to them: <note>Possibly, I will venture to <unclear>say,</unclear><!-- or, any? -->, <add><del><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi></del></add> <del>possibly</del> <unclear>these even</unclear> you yourself may have yet some<!-- or, seen --> reason to ascribe <del><add><unclear>refuse</unclear> from it the</add></del> <del><gap/><!-- it seems to me that ont he previous line Bentham wrote the first letters of the word ascribe (ie. as) then initially carried on the followin line, with -cribe to it:, before deleting this, and writing ascribe in full on the previous line (which is why it's slanting/added in different pen.  Should -cribe therefore be added again on this line (if it's written in full on the previous line? --> to it</del>: In this point of view there might possibly also be some use in your Customary a <gap/> <del>testing a view of this</del> upon the <gap/> <del>prospect</del> before it met the public eye.</note>  But this,
I have seen any where <del>ascribed</del> <add>attributed</add> to them: <note>Possibly, I will venture to <unclear>say,</unclear><!-- or, any? -->, <add><del><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi></del></add> <del>possibly</del> <unclear>these even</unclear> you yourself may have yet some<!-- or, seen --> reason to ascribe <del><add><unclear>refuse</unclear> from it the</add></del> <del><gap/><!-- it seems to me that on the previous line Bentham wrote the first letters of the word ascribe (ie. as) then initially carried on the following line, with -cribe to it:, before deleting this, and writing ascribe in full on the previous line (which is why it's slanting/added in different pen.  Should -cribe therefore be added again on this line (if it's written in full on the previous line? --> to it</del>: In this point of view there might possibly also be some use in your Customary a <gap/> <del>testing a view of this</del> upon the <gap/> <del>prospect</del> before it met the public eye.</note>  But this,
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>I <unclear>spent days</unclear></add> though <add>however</add> the <unclear>principal</unclear> subject: <del>if the proposed plan</del><add>but this <unclear>principal</unclear> one</add>, is by
<add>I <unclear>spent days</unclear></add> though <add>however</add> the <unclear>principal</unclear> object: <del>if the proposed plan</del> <add>but this <unclear>principal</unclear> one</add>, is by
<lb/>
<lb/>
no means the only one.</p>
no means the only one.
<p>To look <gap/> <add>deep <del>fear</del> and wider and steadily</add> into <gap/> requires more leisure <add><del>time</del></add>,  
<lb/></p>
<p>To look <add>deep <del>fear</del> and wider and steadily</add> <gap/> into <gap/> requires more leisure <add><del>time</del></add>,  
<lb/>
<lb/>
than, a man <add>the <gap/></add> on whose <gap/><add><del>attention</del> <add><del>directions</del></add> attention</add> the present depends <add><del>took</del> <del><unclear>turns</unclear></del></add>
than, a man <add>the <gap/></add> on whose <gap/><add><del>attention</del> <add><del>directions</del></add> <add>attention</add> the present depends <add><del><unclear>terms</unclear></del> <del><unclear>rests</unclear></del></add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
can <del>will</del> <add>easily</add> <gap/>.  To <del>me</del> <add><del><unclear>mean</unclear></del> <add>me</add></add>, <gap/> at last has not been
can <del>will</del> <add>easily</add> <gap/>.  To <del>me</del> <add><del><unclear>mean</unclear></del> <add>me</add></add>, <gap/> at last has not been

Revision as of 11:51, 16 February 2011

File:JB 002 015 001.jpg

under construction ...

Sir.
I take the liberty of submitting to you
the skeleton of a proposed measure, the objects enlisted with as well as
subject matter of which are uesd not here be requested,, apparent

I submitt its in this its realisd state, unsupported without any
support by reasons from argument: because to you, for one
of the sort that might be unsure contrary <add>of use</add> there might be twenty
thus, to you would be superfluous, and repulsive. You will scarce but upon a jurist I believe that has not received some consideration: whatsoever use might be degree of the sort of judgement that has grounded on it may have been the result of it.

On the term of utility useful efficacy or practicability, if I
were fortunately enough to learn, in relation to what
it appeared upon a first glance objectionable to you I would in any subsequent
communication on the subject confine myself to these
points. [Under both these trends after as on firstly close
accumulation of about 1 1/2 year, I must confess myself
not to want for firstly will afford confidence.]

Any point much more strongly to our measures look much more to
the kind of : regarding the measures that
under your Administration have been taken with regard
to the principal point, the reduction of the National Debt,
as professed of a by farmuch more rapid degree of efficacy, than
I have seen any where ascribed attributed to them: Possibly, I will venture to say,, + possibly these even you yourself may have yet some reason to ascribe refuse from it the to it: In this point of view there might possibly also be some use in your Customary a testing a view of this upon the prospect before it met the public eye. But this,
I spent days though however the principal object: if the proposed plan but this principal one, is by
no means the only one.

To look deep fear and wider and steadily into requires more leisure time,
than, a man the on whose attention <add>directions attention the present depends terms rests
can will easily . To me mean <add>me</add>, at last has not been
wanting, however it be with other requisites.

A Map of even though drawn by an masterful
hand, may not be without its use, even to a the most skillful
eye: because for in a truth so wen the first attempt
conquers maps conquer efforts conquer the greatest difficulty: and correct views are
then suggested by erronous ones. to a correct view







Template:Infobox Folio

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in