★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet'' | ''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet'' | ||
<head>NONCON. Crit. Review</head> | <head>NONCON. Crit. Review</head> | ||
argumenting in their defense supposing<lb/><unclear>him</unclear>to produce an argument which <lb/>for a moment might appear specious<lb/><unclear> | argumenting in their defense supposing<lb/><unclear>him</unclear>to produce an argument which <lb/>for a moment might appear specious<lb/><unclear>must</unclear> I in order to oppose it,<del><gap/><add><unclear>bother</unclear></add></del><lb/><gap/><add>myself to</add><unclear>intrestive</unclear> and exclamation?<lb/> nothing could be more important or more<lb/>imprudent<gap/><note>in proportion as it was <unclear>specious</unclear>, it would appear, that I was flying from the contest: while standing firm on the ground of reason, the simple<gap/>I(I might indeed with justice show my <unclear>anger</unclear> if <gap/><add>casting</add>off the habit of a reasoner, he were to <unclear>belabour</unclear> himself to the painting instead of offensive Images of the enjoyment of the former of these <unclear>axioms</unclear></note> the simple <del>opposition</del><add>suggestion</add>of a<lb/> few manifest considerations would over<lb/>-through his argument into the mire<lb/>for it would be always easy to show, a<lb/>-gainst any partial considerations <add>speculations</add> what<lb/>-soever to the contrary,that the infallible<lb/>tendancy of both these<gap/>if indulged<lb/>to the degree they would, without the <add>law's</add> coercion<lb/> | ||
of the Laws, be indulged, is, to produce a <lb/>clear <unclear>ballance</unclear> of <del><gap/></del> <add>unhappiness</add> in a Society.<lb/><pb/> | of the Laws, be indulged, is, to produce a <lb/>clear <unclear>ballance</unclear> of <del><gap/></del> <add>unhappiness</add> in a Society.<lb/><pb/> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet
NONCON. Crit. Review
argumenting in their defense supposing
himto produce an argument which
for a moment might appear specious
must I in order to oppose it,bother
myself tointrestive and exclamation?
nothing could be more important or more
imprudentin proportion as it was specious, it would appear, that I was flying from the contest: while standing firm on the ground of reason, the simpleI(I might indeed with justice show my anger if castingoff the habit of a reasoner, he were to belabour himself to the painting instead of offensive Images of the enjoyment of the former of these axioms the simple oppositionsuggestionof a
few manifest considerations would over
-through his argument into the mire
for it would be always easy to show, a
-gainst any partial considerations speculations what
-soever to the contrary,that the infallible
tendancy of both theseif indulged
to the degree they would, without the law's coercion
of the Laws, be indulged, is, to produce a
clear ballance of unhappiness in a Society.
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/073/093/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
073 |
law in general |
||
|
093 |
noncon. crit. review |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
f3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[partial lion motif]]] |
||
|
23933 |
|||
